{"title":"First Amendment Fora Revisited: How Many Categories Are There?","authors":"Marc Rohr","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2850640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court has allowed considerable judicial confusion to develop with respect to its “public forum” categories in First Amendment law. Because some courts have (reasonably) inferred that the “limited public forum” and the “non-public forum” are, analytically, one and the same, confusion persists as to the proper terminology and the number of “forum” categories. This short article explores those questions and suggests a resolution.","PeriodicalId":82201,"journal":{"name":"Nova law review","volume":"41 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nova law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2850640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The Supreme Court has allowed considerable judicial confusion to develop with respect to its “public forum” categories in First Amendment law. Because some courts have (reasonably) inferred that the “limited public forum” and the “non-public forum” are, analytically, one and the same, confusion persists as to the proper terminology and the number of “forum” categories. This short article explores those questions and suggests a resolution.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
