{"title":"Validation of Velocity Measuring Devices in Velocity Based Strength Training","authors":"Thorben Menrad, Jürgen Edelmann-Nusser","doi":"10.2478/ijcss-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To control and monitor strength training with a barbell various systems are on the consumer market. They provide the user with information regarding velocity, acceleration and trajectory of the barbell. Some systems additionally calculate the 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) of exercises and use it to suggest individual intensities for future training. Three systems were tested: GymAware, PUSH Band 2.0 and Vmaxpro. The GymAware system bases on linear position transducers, PUSH Band 2.0 and Vmaxpro base on inertial measurement units. The aim of this paper was to determine the accuracy of the three systems with regard to the determination of the average velocity of each repetition of three barbell strength exercises (squat, barbell rowing, deadlift). The velocity data of the three systems were compared to a Vicon system using linear regression analyses and Bland-Altman-diagrams. In the linear regression analyses the smallest coefficient of determination (R2.) in each exercise can be observed for PUSH Band 2.0. In the Bland-Altman diagrams the mean value of the differences in the average velocities is near zero for all systems and all exercises. PUSH Band 2.0 has the largest differences between the Limits of Agreement. For GymAware and Vmaxpro these differences are comparable.","PeriodicalId":38466,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Science in Sport","volume":"20 1","pages":"106 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Science in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2021-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Abstract To control and monitor strength training with a barbell various systems are on the consumer market. They provide the user with information regarding velocity, acceleration and trajectory of the barbell. Some systems additionally calculate the 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) of exercises and use it to suggest individual intensities for future training. Three systems were tested: GymAware, PUSH Band 2.0 and Vmaxpro. The GymAware system bases on linear position transducers, PUSH Band 2.0 and Vmaxpro base on inertial measurement units. The aim of this paper was to determine the accuracy of the three systems with regard to the determination of the average velocity of each repetition of three barbell strength exercises (squat, barbell rowing, deadlift). The velocity data of the three systems were compared to a Vicon system using linear regression analyses and Bland-Altman-diagrams. In the linear regression analyses the smallest coefficient of determination (R2.) in each exercise can be observed for PUSH Band 2.0. In the Bland-Altman diagrams the mean value of the differences in the average velocities is near zero for all systems and all exercises. PUSH Band 2.0 has the largest differences between the Limits of Agreement. For GymAware and Vmaxpro these differences are comparable.
摘要为了控制和监测杠铃力量训练,消费市场上有各种系统。它们为用户提供关于杠铃的速度、加速度和轨迹的信息。一些系统还计算了训练的最大1次重复(1RM),并用它来建议未来训练的个人强度。测试了三个系统:GymAware、PUSH Band 2.0和Vmaxpro。GymAware系统基于线性位置传感器,PUSH Band 2.0和Vmaxpro基于惯性测量单元。本文的目的是确定三个系统在确定三种杠铃力量练习(深蹲、杠铃划船、提举)每次重复的平均速度方面的准确性。使用线性回归分析和Bland-Altman图将三个系统的速度数据与Vicon系统进行比较。在线性回归分析中,可以观察到PUSH Band 2.0在每次锻炼中的最小决定系数(R2)。在Bland-Altman图中,所有系统和所有练习的平均速度差的平均值都接近零。PUSH Band 2.0在协议限制之间的差异最大。对于GymAware和Vmaxpro,这些差异具有可比性。