Proving the infeasibility of Horn formulas through read-once resolution

Abstract

In this paper, we study Horn formulas from the perspective of read-once resolution refutations (RORs). A Horn formula is a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form (CNF), in which each clause contains at most one positive literal. Horn formulas are used in a number of domains, including program verification, logic programming, and econometrics. In particular, deduction in ProLog is based on unification. Unification is based on resolution and instantiation. Resolution is a system used to prove the infeasibility of Boolean formulas. It is important to note that resolution is both sound and complete. However, resolution is inefficient in the following sense: There exist CNF formulas with resolution refutations whose lengths are bounded below by an exponential function of the input size. At the same time, these formulas admit shorter (polynomially bounded) proofs of infeasibility in other proof systems, such as Frege Systems. Despite this inefficiency, resolution is simple and easy to implement and hence used in a wide variety of theorem provers. In this paper, we study two variants of resolution. These are read-once resolution (ROR) and read-once unit resolution (UROR). Both ROR and UROR are sound. However, they are incomplete since there exist infeasible Boolean formulas which do not have either an ROR or a UROR. In this paper, we look at the problems of determining if a Horn formula has an ROR or a UROR. We also examine the problem of finding the optimal length ROR of a Horn formula from both the computational complexity and the approximation perspectives. Finally, we analyze the copy complexity of Horn formulas with respect to URORs.