[Design and content validity of the Continuity of Care Across Levels of Care QuestionnaireDesenho e validade de conteúdo do questionário de continuidade de cuidados entre os níveis de ateneo].
Alexandra Marín Sánchez, María Del Carmen Gogeascoechea-Trejo, Consuelo Vélez Álvarez, María Sobeida Leticia Blázquez-Morales, Patricia Pavón-León, María Gabriela Nachón-García, Dulce María Cinta Loaiza
{"title":"[Design and content validity of the Continuity of Care Across Levels of Care QuestionnaireDesenho e validade de conteúdo do questionário de continuidade de cuidados entre os níveis de ateneo].","authors":"Alexandra Marín Sánchez, María Del Carmen Gogeascoechea-Trejo, Consuelo Vélez Álvarez, María Sobeida Leticia Blázquez-Morales, Patricia Pavón-León, María Gabriela Nachón-García, Dulce María Cinta Loaiza","doi":"10.15649/cuidarte.2773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the absence of continuity of care, actions aimed at the care of users with chronic non communicable diseases (NCDs) may be omitted or duplicated, which can potentially worsen users' health. In Mexico and Colombia, in particular, there is no instrument for assessing continuity of care that includes its three essential elements.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an instrument to assess care continuity across levels of care for users with NCDs in Mexico and Colombia and validate the content of the questionnaire through expert judgment of versions adapted to the Mexican and Colombian contexts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Continuity of Care across Levels of Care Questionnaire was designed. The content validation process was carried out by experts using the Delphi technique. Sixteen experts were selected (8 per country). Questionnaire items were assessed in four categories: sufficiency, clarity, coherence, and relevance. Two assessment rounds were conducted to determine the level of experts' agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire obtained an 'Excellent' overall Content Validity Coefficient in both countries (0.97).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This instrument, unlike others, assesses the continuity of care in a multidisciplinary manner across the three levels of care from the experience of users with NCDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The questionnaire achieved the expected content validity using the Delphi technique to assess care continuity across levels of care for users with NCDs, according to the Mexican and Colombian contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":43234,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cuidarte","volume":" ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cuidarte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In the absence of continuity of care, actions aimed at the care of users with chronic non communicable diseases (NCDs) may be omitted or duplicated, which can potentially worsen users' health. In Mexico and Colombia, in particular, there is no instrument for assessing continuity of care that includes its three essential elements.
Objective: To develop an instrument to assess care continuity across levels of care for users with NCDs in Mexico and Colombia and validate the content of the questionnaire through expert judgment of versions adapted to the Mexican and Colombian contexts.
Materials and methods: The Continuity of Care across Levels of Care Questionnaire was designed. The content validation process was carried out by experts using the Delphi technique. Sixteen experts were selected (8 per country). Questionnaire items were assessed in four categories: sufficiency, clarity, coherence, and relevance. Two assessment rounds were conducted to determine the level of experts' agreement.
Results: The questionnaire obtained an 'Excellent' overall Content Validity Coefficient in both countries (0.97).
Discussion: This instrument, unlike others, assesses the continuity of care in a multidisciplinary manner across the three levels of care from the experience of users with NCDs.
Conclusion: The questionnaire achieved the expected content validity using the Delphi technique to assess care continuity across levels of care for users with NCDs, according to the Mexican and Colombian contexts.
亮点:护理的连续性是护理质量的重要组成部分,因为它通过提高人们的生活质量和促进他们的福祉来关注人们。患有ECNT的用户需要多学科团队在护理级别之间进行全面和持续的护理,以保持对疾病的控制并预防并发症。德尔菲方法通过来自两个拉丁美洲国家的专家法官小组的共识,验证了CCUNA问卷的内容。CCUNA问卷评估了不同卫生专业人员提供的各级护理连续性的三个基本要素,重点是护理活动。导言:缺乏护理的连续性可能会导致针对患有慢性非传染性疾病的用户的护理行动出现遗漏或重复,导致他们的健康可能恶化。特别是在墨西哥和哥伦比亚,没有一种工具可以评估护理的连续性,其中包括护理的三个基本要素。目标:设计一种工具,评估墨西哥和哥伦比亚患有ECNT的用户护理水平之间的护理连续性;并通过专家对适应墨西哥和哥伦比亚背景的版本的判断来验证问卷的内容。材料和方法:设计护理水平之间护理连续性问卷。使用德尔菲方法进行了专家内容验证过程。选出了16名专家法官(每个国家8名)。问卷中的项目分为四类:充分性、清晰度、一致性和相关性。进行了两轮评估,以确定法官之间的一致程度。结果:问卷获得了两国“优秀”的总体内容效度系数(0.97)。最终版本由85个项目组成,分为三个部分。讨论:与其他工具不同,该工具从使用ECNT的用户体验出发,以多学科的方式评估三个护理级别的护理连续性。结论:该问卷使用德尔菲法达到了预期的内容有效性,以根据墨西哥和哥伦比亚的情况评估患有ECNT的用户护理水平之间护理的连续性。引用这篇文章:Marín Sanchez Alexandra、Gogeascoechea-Trejo María del Carmen、VélezÁlvarez Consuelo、Blázquez-Morales María Sobeida Leticia、Pavon-Leon Patricia、Nachon-García Maria Gabriela、丝带Loaiza Dulce Maria。护理水平之间护理连续性问卷内容的设计和有效性。杂志照顾你。2023年;14(2):E2773http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2773