Fiscal consequences of Alzheimer's disease and informal care provision in the UK: A “government perspective” microsimulation

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Journal of the Economics of Ageing Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100413
Ana T. Paquete , Rui Martins , Nikolaos Kotsopoulos , Michael Urbich , Colin Green , Mark P. Connolly
{"title":"Fiscal consequences of Alzheimer's disease and informal care provision in the UK: A “government perspective” microsimulation","authors":"Ana T. Paquete ,&nbsp;Rui Martins ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kotsopoulos ,&nbsp;Michael Urbich ,&nbsp;Colin Green ,&nbsp;Mark P. Connolly","doi":"10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Estimating the fiscal consequences of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) on patients and informal carers using a UK public economic perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A simulated cohort of 1,000 pairs of people with AD and informal carers was compared with 1,000 demographically identical pairs in the general population. Both cohorts enter the model at the mean age of mild cognitive impairment onset. Time to AD onset was based on the literature and AD progression was modelled using published equations and a state-transition microsimulation. Labour participation, financial support, and paid taxes were linked to cognitive decline and caregiving needs using UK labour statistics and tax rates. Healthcare costs were based on published literature. Future costs and life-years were discounted at 3.5%. Results were reported as incremental differences in total tax revenue, financial support, and healthcare costs, over the AD continuum, between cohorts affected and unaffected by AD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Each AD-affected pair was associated with estimated incremental fiscal losses of £73,749 to the UK government. Financial support and healthcare costs were responsible for 59.3% and 22.2% of AD’s fiscal burden, respectively. Total lost tax revenue due to PwAD and carers’ reduced earnings represented 18.5% of total government losses. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Assuming mild cognitive impairment onset at age 60 let to incremental fiscal losses of £141,323 per AD-affected pair. Fiscal costs for entire UK population with AD were predicted to be £16 billion annually.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Alzheimer’s disease strongly impacts UK’s public economy and should be considered to inform healthcare policymaking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X22000457/pdfft?md5=77cb060da036a25930eeb1205b4bbfc9&pid=1-s2.0-S2212828X22000457-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X22000457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Estimating the fiscal consequences of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) on patients and informal carers using a UK public economic perspective.

Methods

A simulated cohort of 1,000 pairs of people with AD and informal carers was compared with 1,000 demographically identical pairs in the general population. Both cohorts enter the model at the mean age of mild cognitive impairment onset. Time to AD onset was based on the literature and AD progression was modelled using published equations and a state-transition microsimulation. Labour participation, financial support, and paid taxes were linked to cognitive decline and caregiving needs using UK labour statistics and tax rates. Healthcare costs were based on published literature. Future costs and life-years were discounted at 3.5%. Results were reported as incremental differences in total tax revenue, financial support, and healthcare costs, over the AD continuum, between cohorts affected and unaffected by AD.

Results

Each AD-affected pair was associated with estimated incremental fiscal losses of £73,749 to the UK government. Financial support and healthcare costs were responsible for 59.3% and 22.2% of AD’s fiscal burden, respectively. Total lost tax revenue due to PwAD and carers’ reduced earnings represented 18.5% of total government losses. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Assuming mild cognitive impairment onset at age 60 let to incremental fiscal losses of £141,323 per AD-affected pair. Fiscal costs for entire UK population with AD were predicted to be £16 billion annually.

Conclusions

Alzheimer’s disease strongly impacts UK’s public economy and should be considered to inform healthcare policymaking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政后果的阿尔茨海默病和非正式护理提供在英国:“政府视角”微观模拟
目的:从英国公共经济角度评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)对患者和非正式护理人员的财政后果。方法将1000对阿尔茨海默病患者和非正式护理人员的模拟队列与1000对人口统计学上相同的普通人群进行比较。两个队列在轻度认知障碍发病的平均年龄进入模型。阿尔茨海默病发病的时间是基于文献的,阿尔茨海默病的进展是通过发表的方程和状态转移微观模拟来建模的。根据英国劳工统计数据和税率,劳动参与、财政支持和纳税与认知能力下降和照顾需求有关。医疗费用基于已发表的文献。未来成本和寿命年数按3.5%折现。结果显示,在阿尔茨海默病连续期内,受阿尔茨海默病影响和未受阿尔茨海默病影响的人群之间,总税收、财政支持和医疗保健成本存在增量差异。结果每对受ad影响的夫妇对英国政府的财政损失估计为73,749英镑。财政支持和医疗费用分别占阿尔茨海默病财政负担的59.3%和22.2%。残疾人士和护理员收入减少导致的税收损失占政府总损失的18.5%。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。假设60岁开始出现轻度认知障碍,每对ad患者的财政损失将增加141,323英镑。据预测,整个英国AD患者的财政成本每年将达到160亿英镑。结论阿尔茨海默病严重影响英国公共经济,应考虑为医疗保健决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Economics of Ageing (JEoA) is an international academic journal that publishes original theoretical and empirical research dealing with the interaction between demographic change and the economy. JEoA encompasses both microeconomic and macroeconomic perspectives and offers a platform for the discussion of topics including labour, health, and family economics, social security, income distribution, social mobility, immigration, productivity, structural change, economic growth and development. JEoA also solicits papers that have a policy focus.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Intergenerational redistribution in a pay-as-you-go pension system Understanding the heterogeneous health effect of retirement by tracking daily activities Retirement consumption puzzle in Japan: Insights from pension and senior worker employment policy changes An empirical investigation of health dynamics of elders in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1