Role of strain elastography in the diagnosis of superficial soft-tissue lesions

K. Harshith Gowda, G. Mishra, P. Parihar, R. Dhande, Anurag Luharia
{"title":"Role of strain elastography in the diagnosis of superficial soft-tissue lesions","authors":"K. Harshith Gowda, G. Mishra, P. Parihar, R. Dhande, Anurag Luharia","doi":"10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_55_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Elastography, recent progress in the field of imaging, is an innovative approach which provides information pertaining to tissue elasticity. Charting the stiffness can be performed either by assessing the same, using the evaluation of the strain i n the mass of cells in the presence of stress or assessment of shear waves, the propagation of which is dependent on the tissue stiffness, using imaging tools. This study was done to investigate the validity of strain elastography in the diagnosis of superficial soft-tissue lesions in contrast to histopathological examination (HPE) due to the dearth of studies comparing strain elastography and HPE, particularly in the Indian context. Materials and Methods: The present longitudinal study was conducted by the Department of Radiology at AVBRH, Sawangi, Wardha, from the year 2020 to 2022. Ninety-six subjects who were diagnosed or clinically suspected superficial soft-tissue lesions irrespective of age and gender were included. All patients underwent ultrasound, elastography, and final diagnosis was confirmed with HPE. Institutional Ethical Clearance (No: DMIMS [DU]/IEC/2022/340) and before the initiation of the investigation and the recruitment of patients into the study, informed consent was obtained. Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and Kruskal–Wallis test were the tests of significance. Results: The subjects' average age was 40.38 ± 18.95 years, and 57.3% of them were women. On HPE, 21 lesions (21.8%) were categorized as malignant and 75 lesions (77.2%) as benign. The mean strain ratio (SR) was 11.7 ± 4.8 for malignant lesions and 2.5 ± 4.6 for benign lesions. Malignant and benign lesions had a noticeable change in SR. To distinguish between malignant and benign soft-tissue lesions, an SR of >3 had a sensitivity of 95.24%, specificity of 91.89%, positive predictive value of 87.0%, and negative predictive value of 97.1%. Conclusion: SR of malignant lesions was higher than that of benign soft-tissue lesions. SRs performed better as a diagnostic tool than elasticity scores hence, SRs can be utilized as a marker to foretell a soft-tissue tumor's propensity for malignancy.","PeriodicalId":15592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_55_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elastography, recent progress in the field of imaging, is an innovative approach which provides information pertaining to tissue elasticity. Charting the stiffness can be performed either by assessing the same, using the evaluation of the strain i n the mass of cells in the presence of stress or assessment of shear waves, the propagation of which is dependent on the tissue stiffness, using imaging tools. This study was done to investigate the validity of strain elastography in the diagnosis of superficial soft-tissue lesions in contrast to histopathological examination (HPE) due to the dearth of studies comparing strain elastography and HPE, particularly in the Indian context. Materials and Methods: The present longitudinal study was conducted by the Department of Radiology at AVBRH, Sawangi, Wardha, from the year 2020 to 2022. Ninety-six subjects who were diagnosed or clinically suspected superficial soft-tissue lesions irrespective of age and gender were included. All patients underwent ultrasound, elastography, and final diagnosis was confirmed with HPE. Institutional Ethical Clearance (No: DMIMS [DU]/IEC/2022/340) and before the initiation of the investigation and the recruitment of patients into the study, informed consent was obtained. Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and Kruskal–Wallis test were the tests of significance. Results: The subjects' average age was 40.38 ± 18.95 years, and 57.3% of them were women. On HPE, 21 lesions (21.8%) were categorized as malignant and 75 lesions (77.2%) as benign. The mean strain ratio (SR) was 11.7 ± 4.8 for malignant lesions and 2.5 ± 4.6 for benign lesions. Malignant and benign lesions had a noticeable change in SR. To distinguish between malignant and benign soft-tissue lesions, an SR of >3 had a sensitivity of 95.24%, specificity of 91.89%, positive predictive value of 87.0%, and negative predictive value of 97.1%. Conclusion: SR of malignant lesions was higher than that of benign soft-tissue lesions. SRs performed better as a diagnostic tool than elasticity scores hence, SRs can be utilized as a marker to foretell a soft-tissue tumor's propensity for malignancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应变弹性成像在浅表软组织病变诊断中的作用
背景:弹性成像是成像领域的最新进展,是一种提供与组织弹性相关信息的创新方法。可以通过评估硬度来绘制硬度图,使用应力下细胞质量中的应变评估,或者使用成像工具评估剪切波,剪切波的传播取决于组织硬度。本研究旨在研究应变弹性成像与组织病理学检查(HPE)相比,在诊断浅表软组织病变方面的有效性,因为缺乏比较应变弹性成像和HPE的研究,特别是在印度背景下。材料和方法:本纵向研究由沃达Sawangi AVBRH放射科于2020年至2022年进行。包括96名被诊断或临床怀疑为浅表软组织病变的受试者,无论年龄和性别。所有患者均接受了超声、弹性成像检查,最终诊断为HPE。机构伦理许可(编号:DMIMS[DU]/IEC/202/340),在开始调查和招募患者参与研究之前,获得知情同意。卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验是显著性检验。结果:受试者的平均年龄为40.38±18.95岁,其中女性占57.3%。在HPE中,21个病变(21.8%)被归类为恶性,75个病变(77.2%)被分类为良性。恶性病变的平均应变率(SR)为11.7±4.8,良性病变为2.5±4.6。恶性和良性软组织病变的SR有明显变化。区分恶性和良性的软组织病变,SR>3的敏感性为95.24%,特异性为91.89%,阳性预测值为87.0%,阴性预测值为97.1%。SRs作为一种诊断工具比弹性评分表现得更好,因此,SRs可以作为预测软组织肿瘤恶性倾向的标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Academic to AI-cademic: Challenges and Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing Manoeuvring distal tibial shaft fractures with Ender's nailing: Case series Effect of palliative care communication on knowledge and attitude among caregivers of cancer patients The effect of toothbrushing duration on plaque removal: A randomized crossover trial Amelioration of pathological tooth migration by surgical periodontal therapy alone: A stupendous clinical case report with two year follow up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1