An Evaluation Model Based on the Fuzzy AHP for Teleoperation Performance

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED International Journal of Aerospace Psychology Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.1080/24721840.2019.1602472
Chao Wang, J. Niu, Yijing Zhang, Dan Pan
{"title":"An Evaluation Model Based on the Fuzzy AHP for Teleoperation Performance","authors":"Chao Wang, J. Niu, Yijing Zhang, Dan Pan","doi":"10.1080/24721840.2019.1602472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This study is to construct a model composed of multiple indices to measure astronaut teleoperation performance. Background: Teleoperation is a key operation during spaceflight. Comprehensive scientific evaluation techniques for teleoperation performance are important for astronaut selection and training. Method: Four categories of indices, i.e., completion performance, safety performance, subjective cognitive performance and physiological parameters, were adopted in this model. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to compute the weight coefficients of the indices to construct the linear performance model. Sixty-four male subjects were recruited to complete three teleoperation tasks, including point aiming, line alignment, and obstacle avoidance, in simulated environments. Their performance was rated by the researchers after the tasks. Results: The safety performance index had the highest weight coefficient (0.5274) of the first level indices, and the weight coefficient of the collisions index (0.8227) was the highest of the second level indices for safety performance. The linear performance model was constructed to calculate comprehensive performance values. Conclusion: Safety considerations are the most important factors for astronauts to consider in teleoperation. The collision of the robotic arm is the most vital safety index. The comprehensive value derived from the model was significantly related to overall performance. The validity of our model was verified, and it is anticipated that the model will be used to evaluate the performance of remote robotic arm operations.","PeriodicalId":41693,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24721840.2019.1602472","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2019.1602472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study is to construct a model composed of multiple indices to measure astronaut teleoperation performance. Background: Teleoperation is a key operation during spaceflight. Comprehensive scientific evaluation techniques for teleoperation performance are important for astronaut selection and training. Method: Four categories of indices, i.e., completion performance, safety performance, subjective cognitive performance and physiological parameters, were adopted in this model. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to compute the weight coefficients of the indices to construct the linear performance model. Sixty-four male subjects were recruited to complete three teleoperation tasks, including point aiming, line alignment, and obstacle avoidance, in simulated environments. Their performance was rated by the researchers after the tasks. Results: The safety performance index had the highest weight coefficient (0.5274) of the first level indices, and the weight coefficient of the collisions index (0.8227) was the highest of the second level indices for safety performance. The linear performance model was constructed to calculate comprehensive performance values. Conclusion: Safety considerations are the most important factors for astronauts to consider in teleoperation. The collision of the robotic arm is the most vital safety index. The comprehensive value derived from the model was significantly related to overall performance. The validity of our model was verified, and it is anticipated that the model will be used to evaluate the performance of remote robotic arm operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模糊层次分析法的遥操作性能评价模型
摘要目的:本研究旨在构建一个由多个指标组成的模型来衡量宇航员的遥操作性能。背景:遥操作是航天飞行中的一项关键操作。遥操作性能综合科学评价技术对航天员选拔和训练具有重要意义。方法:本模型采用完成感、安全感、主观认知能力和生理参数四类指标。采用模糊层次分析法(AHP)计算指标的权重系数,构建线性绩效模型。64名男性受试者在模拟环境中完成三项远程操作任务,包括点瞄准、直线对准和避障。研究人员在完成任务后对他们的表现进行了评分。结果:在一级安全性能指标中,安全性能指标的权重系数最高(0.5274),在二级安全性能指数中,碰撞指数的权重系数(0.8227)最高。建立了线性性能模型来计算综合性能值。结论:安全考虑是宇航员在遥操作中最重要的考虑因素。机械臂的碰撞是最重要的安全指标。从该模型中得出的综合价值与整体绩效显著相关。我们的模型的有效性得到了验证,预计该模型将用于评估远程机械臂操作的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of General Aviation Pilots’ Aviation Safety Reporting System Incident Narratives Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Effective Monitoring for Early Detection of Hypoxia in Fighter Pilots The Effects of Aeronautical Decision-Making Models on Student Pilots’ Situational Awareness and Cognitive Workload in Simulated Non-Normal Flight Deck Environment The Relationship between Preparation, Impression Management, and Interview Performance in High-Stakes Personnel Selection: A Field Study of Airline Pilot Applicants It Was This Wing Wasn’t It? Identifying the Importance of Verbal Communication in Aviation Maintenance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1