Effects of Model Recordings on Undergraduate Conductors’ Tempo Selections

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research in Music Education Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1177/00224294231183903
B. Silvey, M. Montemayor, D. G. Springer, Faith Hall, Robert Fears
{"title":"Effects of Model Recordings on Undergraduate Conductors’ Tempo Selections","authors":"B. Silvey, M. Montemayor, D. G. Springer, Faith Hall, Robert Fears","doi":"10.1177/00224294231183903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of model recordings on undergraduate conductors’ tempo decisions for selected wind band excerpts. Participants ( N = 42) studied three music score excerpts for 5 minutes each either (a) with an increased-tempo recording, (b) with a decreased-tempo recording, or (c) with a metronome set to the faster, printed tempo in the score, followed by a tapping task to demonstrate their preferred tempo. Participants returned 48 hours after their score study session for retention testing in the form of a second tapping task. Results indicated that for two of the three pieces, participants tapped faster in response to the metronome compared to both the decreased- and increased-tempo model recordings. Participants’ tempo choices at the first testing session were most often not significantly different than the tempos they heard during study. However, we found that participants’ preferred tempos did not vary as a function of study conditions during the retention testing session that occurred 48 hours later, where tempos trended toward moderation across all three musical selections. We speculate that pedagogical recommendations to avoid using model recordings may have limited empirical support, at least among novice conductors and at least in terms of possible long-term effects from short-term use.","PeriodicalId":47469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Music Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294231183903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of model recordings on undergraduate conductors’ tempo decisions for selected wind band excerpts. Participants ( N = 42) studied three music score excerpts for 5 minutes each either (a) with an increased-tempo recording, (b) with a decreased-tempo recording, or (c) with a metronome set to the faster, printed tempo in the score, followed by a tapping task to demonstrate their preferred tempo. Participants returned 48 hours after their score study session for retention testing in the form of a second tapping task. Results indicated that for two of the three pieces, participants tapped faster in response to the metronome compared to both the decreased- and increased-tempo model recordings. Participants’ tempo choices at the first testing session were most often not significantly different than the tempos they heard during study. However, we found that participants’ preferred tempos did not vary as a function of study conditions during the retention testing session that occurred 48 hours later, where tempos trended toward moderation across all three musical selections. We speculate that pedagogical recommendations to avoid using model recordings may have limited empirical support, at least among novice conductors and at least in terms of possible long-term effects from short-term use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模型录音对大学生指挥家节奏选择的影响
本研究的目的是确定模型录音对大学生指挥家对所选管乐队选段的节奏决定的影响。参与者(N = 42)在5分钟内研究了三段乐谱节选,每段都是(a)增加节奏的录音,(b)减少节奏的录音或(c)将节拍器设置为乐谱中更快的印刷节奏,然后进行敲击任务以展示他们喜欢的节奏。参与者返回48 在他们的分数研究会议后数小时,以第二次敲击任务的形式进行保留测试。结果表明,与降低和增加节奏的模型录音相比,三首作品中的两首,参与者对节拍器的敲击反应更快。参与者在第一次测试中的节奏选择通常与他们在研究中听到的节奏没有显著差异。然而,我们发现,在保留测试期间,参与者的首选tempo并没有随着研究条件的变化而变化48 几个小时后,在所有三个音乐选择中,节奏都趋于平缓。我们推测,避免使用模型录音的教学建议可能具有有限的经验支持,至少在新手指挥中是这样,至少在短期使用可能产生的长期影响方面是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The quarterly Journal of Research in Music Education comprises reports of original research related to music teaching and learning. The wide range of topics includes various aspects of music pedagogy, history, and philosophy, and addresses vocal, instrumental, and general music at all levels, from early childhood through adult.
期刊最新文献
Forum Publishing Preparation, Experiences, and Expectations of Music Education Faculty in Higher Education Large Group Performance Evaluation in the United States Teacher Feedback in Collegiate Instrumental Music Lessons Editor’s Forum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1