Finding the right tools for the job: Instrument mixes for land use and transport integration in the Netherlands

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Transport and Land Use Pub Date : 2021-01-24 DOI:10.5198/JTLU.2021.1710
M. V. Geet, S. Lenferink, Tim Busscher, J. Arts
{"title":"Finding the right tools for the job: Instrument mixes for land use and transport integration in the Netherlands","authors":"M. V. Geet, S. Lenferink, Tim Busscher, J. Arts","doi":"10.5198/JTLU.2021.1710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments have widely established policy goals, which span the domains of land use and transport. Despite these integrated ambitions, government action often remains fragmented. This study adopts an instrumental perspective to encourage land-use and transport integration (LUTI). So far, the existing literature on this subject has adopted a single-instrument perspective and has been primarily focused on technical, rather than governance-oriented, instruments. Using a comprehensive analytical framework derived from combining policy integration and policy instrument theory, this in-depth multiple case study of the Dutch provinces of Friesland, Overijssel and North Brabant investigates how governments use a mix of policy instruments throughout the policy process to achieve LUTI in collaboration with municipalities. These instruments are compared based on how they structure interaction — i.e., the transfer of resources — across horizontal and vertical boundaries. The study finds that there is not one right tool to achieve LUTI. Instead, it is about finding the right mix of instruments, which, in line with LUTI goals, helps overcome government fragmentation by structuring interaction patterns across horizontal and vertical boundaries. Interestingly, each province adopts a unique mix of instruments that reflects a specific approach, typical to the case.","PeriodicalId":47271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5198/JTLU.2021.1710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Governments have widely established policy goals, which span the domains of land use and transport. Despite these integrated ambitions, government action often remains fragmented. This study adopts an instrumental perspective to encourage land-use and transport integration (LUTI). So far, the existing literature on this subject has adopted a single-instrument perspective and has been primarily focused on technical, rather than governance-oriented, instruments. Using a comprehensive analytical framework derived from combining policy integration and policy instrument theory, this in-depth multiple case study of the Dutch provinces of Friesland, Overijssel and North Brabant investigates how governments use a mix of policy instruments throughout the policy process to achieve LUTI in collaboration with municipalities. These instruments are compared based on how they structure interaction — i.e., the transfer of resources — across horizontal and vertical boundaries. The study finds that there is not one right tool to achieve LUTI. Instead, it is about finding the right mix of instruments, which, in line with LUTI goals, helps overcome government fragmentation by structuring interaction patterns across horizontal and vertical boundaries. Interestingly, each province adopts a unique mix of instruments that reflects a specific approach, typical to the case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找合适的工作工具:荷兰土地利用和交通一体化的仪器组合
各国政府广泛制定了政策目标,这些目标涉及土地利用和运输领域。尽管有这些综合的雄心,但政府的行动往往仍然支离破碎。本研究采用工具性视角,鼓励土地利用和交通一体化。到目前为止,关于这一主题的现有文献采用了单一的工具视角,主要关注技术工具,而不是面向治理的工具。这项针对荷兰弗里斯兰省、奥弗里塞尔省和北布拉班特省的深入多案例研究采用了政策整合和政策工具理论相结合的综合分析框架,调查了政府如何在整个政策过程中使用多种政策工具,与市镇合作实现LUTI。这些工具是根据它们如何跨越水平和垂直边界构建相互作用(即资源转移)进行比较的。研究发现,没有一个合适的工具来实现LUTI。相反,它是关于找到正确的工具组合,这符合LUTI的目标,通过构建横向和纵向边界的互动模式,有助于克服政府分裂。有趣的是,每个省都采用了一种独特的工具组合,反映了一种特定的方法,这是典型的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transport and Land Usepublishes original interdisciplinary papers on the interaction of transport and land use. Domains include: engineering, planning, modeling, behavior, economics, geography, regional science, sociology, architecture and design, network science, and complex systems. Papers reporting innovative methodologies, original data, and new empirical findings are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Access-based land value appreciation for assessing project benefits Revealing social dimensions of urban mobility with big data: A timely dialogue Exploring practices for facilitating integrated strategic land use and transport planning in the Nordic countries Does rail transit access affect firm dynamics? Analysis of firm births and closures in Maryland, USA Incorporating diminishing returns to opportunities in access: Development of an open-source walkability index based on multi-activity accessibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1