An Investigation of Ethical Environments of CPAs: Public Accounting versus Industry

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Behavioral Research in Accounting Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.2308/BRIA-51561
Donna D. Bobek, Derek Dalton, Brian E. Daugherty, Amy M. Hageman, Robin R. Radtke
{"title":"An Investigation of Ethical Environments of CPAs: Public Accounting versus Industry","authors":"Donna D. Bobek, Derek Dalton, Brian E. Daugherty, Amy M. Hageman, Robin R. Radtke","doi":"10.2308/BRIA-51561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to investigate certified public accountants' (CPAs) perceptions of their ethical environments. More specifically, we compare the perceptions of CPAs in (1) public accounting firms to those in industry, and (2) perceptions of CPAs at Big 4 public accounting firms to those at non-Big 4 firms. The ethical environment is one component of overall organizational culture and is important for encouraging ethical decision making. Based on responses from 904 CPAs, we find CPAs working at public accounting firms perceive their ethical environments as significantly stronger than CPAs in industry (and other nonpublic accounting work settings). Additionally, within public accounting, CPAs at Big 4 firms perceive their ethical environments as significantly stronger than those working at non-Big 4 accounting firms. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Data Availability: Please contact the authors.","PeriodicalId":46356,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","volume":"29 1","pages":"43-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/BRIA-51561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to investigate certified public accountants' (CPAs) perceptions of their ethical environments. More specifically, we compare the perceptions of CPAs in (1) public accounting firms to those in industry, and (2) perceptions of CPAs at Big 4 public accounting firms to those at non-Big 4 firms. The ethical environment is one component of overall organizational culture and is important for encouraging ethical decision making. Based on responses from 904 CPAs, we find CPAs working at public accounting firms perceive their ethical environments as significantly stronger than CPAs in industry (and other nonpublic accounting work settings). Additionally, within public accounting, CPAs at Big 4 firms perceive their ethical environments as significantly stronger than those working at non-Big 4 accounting firms. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Data Availability: Please contact the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注册会计师的伦理环境调查:公共会计与行业
摘要:本文旨在调查注册会计师对其道德环境的认知。更具体地说,我们比较了(1)公共会计师事务所和行业会计师对注册会计师的看法,以及(2)四大公共会计师事务所对注册会计师和非四大会计师事务所的看法。道德环境是整个组织文化的一个组成部分,对鼓励道德决策非常重要。根据904名注册会计师的回复,我们发现在会计师事务所工作的注册会计师认为他们的道德环境比行业中的注册会计师(以及其他非公开会计工作环境)要强大得多。此外,在公共会计领域,四大会计师事务所的注册会计师认为他们的道德环境比非四大会计师公司的会计师要强大得多。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。数据可用性:请联系作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Relative Performance Information and Rule-Breaking: The Moderating Effect of Group Identity In All Fairness: A Meta-Analysis of the Tax Fairness–Tax Compliance Literature I’m Working Hard, but It’s Hardly Working: The Consequences of Motivating Employee Effort That Fails to Achieve Performance Targets Auditor Materiality Disclosures and Investor Trust: How to Address Conditional Risks of Disclosure Mandates The Conservatism Principle and Asymmetric Preferences over Reporting Errors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1