From Fukoku Kyohei to Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing: a comparative analysis of Imperial China and Japan

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Comparative Legal History Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238
David K. C. Huang, Nigel N. T. Li
{"title":"From Fukoku Kyohei to Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing: a comparative analysis of Imperial China and Japan","authors":"David K. C. Huang, Nigel N. T. Li","doi":"10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan’s Meiji Restoration was a modernisation reform Imperial China aimed to transplant. However, China failed in applying Japan’s (Meiji) constitutionalism of Fukoku Kyohei and the institution thereof. This article examines the then social-political grounds of both China and Japan through a comparative approach to explore why China floundered whilst Japan succeeded from the perspective of institutes of constitution. The conclusion of this article is that the differences between China and Japan were underestimated, that the Imperial Court of China neglected the difficulties of the transplantation because they saw only the fruits of Fukoku Kyohei (Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing).","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"8 1","pages":"27 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Japan’s Meiji Restoration was a modernisation reform Imperial China aimed to transplant. However, China failed in applying Japan’s (Meiji) constitutionalism of Fukoku Kyohei and the institution thereof. This article examines the then social-political grounds of both China and Japan through a comparative approach to explore why China floundered whilst Japan succeeded from the perspective of institutes of constitution. The conclusion of this article is that the differences between China and Japan were underestimated, that the Imperial Court of China neglected the difficulties of the transplantation because they saw only the fruits of Fukoku Kyohei (Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从《福国京平》到《福国强兵》:中国与日本帝国的比较分析
日本的明治维新是中国帝国旨在移植的现代化改革。但是,中国在运用日本(明治)立宪制及其制度方面却失败了。本文通过比较的方法考察了中日两国当时的社会政治基础,并从宪法制度的角度探讨了中日之间的困境与成功。本文的结论是,中日之间的差异被低估了,中国朝廷忽视了移植的困难,因为他们只看到了福国强兵的果实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Arbeit und Familie in Nordwesteuropa im Spätmittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit / Travail et famille en Europe du Nord-Ouest au bas Moyen Âge et à l’époque moderne We, the King. Creating royal legislation in the sixteenth century Spanish New World The ideal river: how control of nature shaped the international order Intervention and state sovereignty in Central Europe, 1500–1780 Comparative nomogenetics: revisiting Wigmore’s oriental(ist) encounter and the taxonomy of his approach to global legal history
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1