Modelling Exchange Rate Volatility Dynamics: Empirical Evidence From South Africa

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1080/10800379.2018.12097339
C. May, G. Farrell
{"title":"Modelling Exchange Rate Volatility Dynamics: Empirical Evidence From South Africa","authors":"C. May, G. Farrell","doi":"10.1080/10800379.2018.12097339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we extend the literature on modelling exchange rate v olatility in South Africa by estimating a range of models, including some that attempt to account for structural breaks and long memory. We examine the key nominal exchange rates of the South African rand and replicate common findings in the literature; particularly that volatility is ‘persistent’. We investigate whether this ‘persistence’ is due to structural breaks or long memory, and the extent of asymmetric responses of the rand to ‘good news’ and ‘bad news’. Our results show that while long memory is evident in the actual processes, a structural break analysis reveals that this feature is partially explained by unaccounted shifts in volatility regime; the most striking finding is the remarkable fall in the estimates of volatility persistence when considerably more structural breaks than those identified in recent studies are detected and integrated into the generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) framework. Furthermore, the asymmetric GARCH model results provide evidence of leverage effects, indicating that negative shocks imply a higher next period volatility than positive shocks. The empirical results also shed light on the timing and likely triggers of volatility regime switching.","PeriodicalId":55873,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","volume":"42 1","pages":"71 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10800379.2018.12097339","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2018.12097339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper, we extend the literature on modelling exchange rate v olatility in South Africa by estimating a range of models, including some that attempt to account for structural breaks and long memory. We examine the key nominal exchange rates of the South African rand and replicate common findings in the literature; particularly that volatility is ‘persistent’. We investigate whether this ‘persistence’ is due to structural breaks or long memory, and the extent of asymmetric responses of the rand to ‘good news’ and ‘bad news’. Our results show that while long memory is evident in the actual processes, a structural break analysis reveals that this feature is partially explained by unaccounted shifts in volatility regime; the most striking finding is the remarkable fall in the estimates of volatility persistence when considerably more structural breaks than those identified in recent studies are detected and integrated into the generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) framework. Furthermore, the asymmetric GARCH model results provide evidence of leverage effects, indicating that negative shocks imply a higher next period volatility than positive shocks. The empirical results also shed light on the timing and likely triggers of volatility regime switching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汇率波动动力学建模:来自南非的经验证据
在本文中,我们通过估计一系列模型来扩展关于南非汇率波动性建模的文献,其中包括一些试图解释结构断裂和长记忆的模型。我们研究了南非兰特的主要名义汇率,并复制了文献中的共同发现;尤其是波动性是“持续的”。我们调查了这种“持续性”是由于结构断裂还是长记忆,以及兰特对“好消息”和“坏消息”的不对称反应程度。我们的结果表明,虽然长记忆在实际过程中是明显的,但结构断裂分析表明,这一特征的部分原因是波动机制的不合理变化;最引人注目的发现是,当检测到比最近研究中发现的结构断裂多得多的结构断裂并将其整合到广义自回归条件异方差(GARCH)框架中时,波动持续性的估计值显著下降。此外,非对称GARCH模型的结果提供了杠杆效应的证据,表明负冲击意味着下一阶段的波动率高于正冲击。实证结果还揭示了波动率制度转换的时机和可能的触发因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published by the Bureau for Economic Research and the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch. Articles in the field of study of Economics (in the widest sense of the word).
期刊最新文献
Structural estimates of the South African sacrifice ratio Central Bank Independence and Inflation in India: The Role of Financial Development Threshold effects of regional fiscal stress index on employment Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective Assessment of the impact of government response measures on the spread of COVID-19: panel data evidence for 50 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1