Yield- and protein-neutral reduction in fertilizer rate for wheat, maize and rice can reduce the release of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in China
{"title":"Yield- and protein-neutral reduction in fertilizer rate for wheat, maize and rice can reduce the release of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in China","authors":"Changlu Hu, V. Sadras, Zhaodong Wang, Wenting Du, Xiaoxiao Lei, Maolin Yang, Longcai Zhao, Pan-pan Zhang, Junmei Liu, Guoyan Lu, Xueyun Yang, Shulan Zhang","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/acd6a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeking food security, contemporary Chinese agriculture has followed a trajectory of overfertilization and associated environmental problems, hence the need for nitrogen-balancing practices that do not compromise yield and quality. Here we present a national meta-analysis using 224 studies with 1972 comparisons to quantify the potential to reduce nitrogen (N) fertilization to improve environmental outcomes while maintaining yield and grain protein. We calculated a nitrogen reduction ratio (NRR), as 100 × (N C − N T)/N C; where N is N fertilizer rate and subscripts indicate farmer practice (C) and reduced N rate treatment (T). Our meta-analysis showed that the NRR that maintained yield and grain protein content at the level of current practice was up to 10% in wheat and up to 30% in maize and rice. Larger yield-neutral NRR could be achieved in more fertile, heavier-textured soils, and with practices including enhanced-efficiency N fertilizer, combined application of organic and inorganic N fertilizer, and incorporated straw. Assuming a reduction in N fertilizer usage by 10% for wheat and by 30% for maize and rice in the current cropping area, there is a potential to save 5.7 Mt N yr−1; reduce loss of reactive nitrogen by 1.26 Mt N yr−1, equivalent to 63% of annual total Nr losses for rice in China, reduce N-related greenhouse emissions by 75.2 Mt CO2-eq yr−1, equivalent to 14.5%–25% of the emissions associated with the N fertilizer chain in China; and improve N use efficiency by 23%. Our results highlight the feasibility of maintaining yield and grain protein, and achieving substantial environmental benefits with reduced fertilization rate, and the environmental and agronomic scenarios where these outcomes are more likely.","PeriodicalId":11747,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd6a9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seeking food security, contemporary Chinese agriculture has followed a trajectory of overfertilization and associated environmental problems, hence the need for nitrogen-balancing practices that do not compromise yield and quality. Here we present a national meta-analysis using 224 studies with 1972 comparisons to quantify the potential to reduce nitrogen (N) fertilization to improve environmental outcomes while maintaining yield and grain protein. We calculated a nitrogen reduction ratio (NRR), as 100 × (N C − N T)/N C; where N is N fertilizer rate and subscripts indicate farmer practice (C) and reduced N rate treatment (T). Our meta-analysis showed that the NRR that maintained yield and grain protein content at the level of current practice was up to 10% in wheat and up to 30% in maize and rice. Larger yield-neutral NRR could be achieved in more fertile, heavier-textured soils, and with practices including enhanced-efficiency N fertilizer, combined application of organic and inorganic N fertilizer, and incorporated straw. Assuming a reduction in N fertilizer usage by 10% for wheat and by 30% for maize and rice in the current cropping area, there is a potential to save 5.7 Mt N yr−1; reduce loss of reactive nitrogen by 1.26 Mt N yr−1, equivalent to 63% of annual total Nr losses for rice in China, reduce N-related greenhouse emissions by 75.2 Mt CO2-eq yr−1, equivalent to 14.5%–25% of the emissions associated with the N fertilizer chain in China; and improve N use efficiency by 23%. Our results highlight the feasibility of maintaining yield and grain protein, and achieving substantial environmental benefits with reduced fertilization rate, and the environmental and agronomic scenarios where these outcomes are more likely.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Research Letters (ERL) is a high-impact, open-access journal intended to be the meeting place of the research and policy communities concerned with environmental change and management.
The journal''s coverage reflects the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of environmental science, recognizing the wide-ranging contributions to the development of methods, tools and evaluation strategies relevant to the field. Submissions from across all components of the Earth system, i.e. land, atmosphere, cryosphere, biosphere and hydrosphere, and exchanges between these components are welcome.