Yield- and protein-neutral reduction in fertilizer rate for wheat, maize and rice can reduce the release of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in China

IF 5.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Research Letters Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/acd6a9
Changlu Hu, V. Sadras, Zhaodong Wang, Wenting Du, Xiaoxiao Lei, Maolin Yang, Longcai Zhao, Pan-pan Zhang, Junmei Liu, Guoyan Lu, Xueyun Yang, Shulan Zhang
{"title":"Yield- and protein-neutral reduction in fertilizer rate for wheat, maize and rice can reduce the release of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in China","authors":"Changlu Hu, V. Sadras, Zhaodong Wang, Wenting Du, Xiaoxiao Lei, Maolin Yang, Longcai Zhao, Pan-pan Zhang, Junmei Liu, Guoyan Lu, Xueyun Yang, Shulan Zhang","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/acd6a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeking food security, contemporary Chinese agriculture has followed a trajectory of overfertilization and associated environmental problems, hence the need for nitrogen-balancing practices that do not compromise yield and quality. Here we present a national meta-analysis using 224 studies with 1972 comparisons to quantify the potential to reduce nitrogen (N) fertilization to improve environmental outcomes while maintaining yield and grain protein. We calculated a nitrogen reduction ratio (NRR), as 100 × (N C − N T)/N C; where N is N fertilizer rate and subscripts indicate farmer practice (C) and reduced N rate treatment (T). Our meta-analysis showed that the NRR that maintained yield and grain protein content at the level of current practice was up to 10% in wheat and up to 30% in maize and rice. Larger yield-neutral NRR could be achieved in more fertile, heavier-textured soils, and with practices including enhanced-efficiency N fertilizer, combined application of organic and inorganic N fertilizer, and incorporated straw. Assuming a reduction in N fertilizer usage by 10% for wheat and by 30% for maize and rice in the current cropping area, there is a potential to save 5.7 Mt N yr−1; reduce loss of reactive nitrogen by 1.26 Mt N yr−1, equivalent to 63% of annual total Nr losses for rice in China, reduce N-related greenhouse emissions by 75.2 Mt CO2-eq yr−1, equivalent to 14.5%–25% of the emissions associated with the N fertilizer chain in China; and improve N use efficiency by 23%. Our results highlight the feasibility of maintaining yield and grain protein, and achieving substantial environmental benefits with reduced fertilization rate, and the environmental and agronomic scenarios where these outcomes are more likely.","PeriodicalId":11747,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd6a9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seeking food security, contemporary Chinese agriculture has followed a trajectory of overfertilization and associated environmental problems, hence the need for nitrogen-balancing practices that do not compromise yield and quality. Here we present a national meta-analysis using 224 studies with 1972 comparisons to quantify the potential to reduce nitrogen (N) fertilization to improve environmental outcomes while maintaining yield and grain protein. We calculated a nitrogen reduction ratio (NRR), as 100 × (N C − N T)/N C; where N is N fertilizer rate and subscripts indicate farmer practice (C) and reduced N rate treatment (T). Our meta-analysis showed that the NRR that maintained yield and grain protein content at the level of current practice was up to 10% in wheat and up to 30% in maize and rice. Larger yield-neutral NRR could be achieved in more fertile, heavier-textured soils, and with practices including enhanced-efficiency N fertilizer, combined application of organic and inorganic N fertilizer, and incorporated straw. Assuming a reduction in N fertilizer usage by 10% for wheat and by 30% for maize and rice in the current cropping area, there is a potential to save 5.7 Mt N yr−1; reduce loss of reactive nitrogen by 1.26 Mt N yr−1, equivalent to 63% of annual total Nr losses for rice in China, reduce N-related greenhouse emissions by 75.2 Mt CO2-eq yr−1, equivalent to 14.5%–25% of the emissions associated with the N fertilizer chain in China; and improve N use efficiency by 23%. Our results highlight the feasibility of maintaining yield and grain protein, and achieving substantial environmental benefits with reduced fertilization rate, and the environmental and agronomic scenarios where these outcomes are more likely.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中国,小麦、玉米和水稻的产量和蛋白质中性施肥可以减少活性氮的释放和温室气体的排放
为了寻求粮食安全,当代中国农业已经走上了过度施肥和相关环境问题的轨道,因此需要在不影响产量和质量的情况下进行氮平衡。在这里,我们提出了一项全国性的荟萃分析,使用了224项研究和1972项比较,以量化减少氮(N)施肥以改善环境结果的潜力,同时保持产量和谷物蛋白质。我们计算了氮还原率(NRR),为100×(N C−N T)/N C;其中N是氮肥施用率,下标表示农民实践(C)和降低氮肥施用率处理(T)。我们的荟萃分析显示,将产量和谷物蛋白质含量保持在当前实践水平的NRR在小麦中高达10%,在玉米和水稻中高达30%。在更肥沃、质地更重的土壤中,通过提高氮肥效率、有机和无机氮肥的联合施用以及秸秆还田等做法,可以实现更大的产量中性NRR。假设当前种植区小麦氮肥用量减少10%,玉米和水稻氮肥用量减少30%,则有可能在1年内节省570万吨氮肥;将活性氮损失减少126 Mt N yr−1,相当于中国水稻年总氮损失的63%,将氮相关温室气体排放减少7520 Mt CO2 eq yr−2,相当于我国氮肥链相关排放的14.5%-25%;氮利用效率提高23%。我们的研究结果强调了保持产量和谷物蛋白质的可行性,并通过降低施肥率实现实质性的环境效益,以及这些结果更有可能出现的环境和农艺情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research Letters
Environmental Research Letters 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
763
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Research Letters (ERL) is a high-impact, open-access journal intended to be the meeting place of the research and policy communities concerned with environmental change and management. The journal''s coverage reflects the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of environmental science, recognizing the wide-ranging contributions to the development of methods, tools and evaluation strategies relevant to the field. Submissions from across all components of the Earth system, i.e. land, atmosphere, cryosphere, biosphere and hydrosphere, and exchanges between these components are welcome.
期刊最新文献
How are African livestock farmers responding to climate variability and change? A systematic review. Urban and socioeconomic disparities in PM2.5 exposure across 340 Latin American cities. City-wide space-time patterns of environmental noise pollution in Kigali, Rwanda. The effectiveness of heat prevention plans in reducing heat-related mortality across Europe. Assessing PM2.5 pollution in the Northeastern United States from the 2023 Canadian wildfire smoke: an episodic study integrating air quality and health impact modeling with emissions and meteorological uncertainty analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1