Jacques Belghiti (Professeur émérite chirurgie digestive, Coordonnateur de la cellule des médecins conseil de la DAJDP), Marie Pierre Dilly-Rushenas (Anesthésiste-Réanimateur, Directrice déléguée à la coordination de la qualité, gestions des risques et droit du patient de l’hôpital Bichât–Claude-Bernard), Sandra Fournier (Responsable du service de prévention du risque infectieux de la DPQAM de l’AP–HP), Magali Richard Piauger (Responsable du département médiation et responsabilité hospitalière de la DAJDP), Soisic Iroz (Directrice déléguée des affaires juridiques et des droits des patients), Daniel Vittecoq (Médecin-conseil DAJDP, SMIT Bicêtre), Charline Nicolas (Directrice des affaires juridiques et des droits des patients), Emmanuel Martinod (Professeur de Chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire de Coordonnateur cellule COVID-19, PCEML)
{"title":"La Direction des affaires juridiques et des droits des patients de l’AP–HP et la première vague de la pandémie Covid-19","authors":"Jacques Belghiti (Professeur émérite chirurgie digestive, Coordonnateur de la cellule des médecins conseil de la DAJDP), Marie Pierre Dilly-Rushenas (Anesthésiste-Réanimateur, Directrice déléguée à la coordination de la qualité, gestions des risques et droit du patient de l’hôpital Bichât–Claude-Bernard), Sandra Fournier (Responsable du service de prévention du risque infectieux de la DPQAM de l’AP–HP), Magali Richard Piauger (Responsable du département médiation et responsabilité hospitalière de la DAJDP), Soisic Iroz (Directrice déléguée des affaires juridiques et des droits des patients), Daniel Vittecoq (Médecin-conseil DAJDP, SMIT Bicêtre), Charline Nicolas (Directrice des affaires juridiques et des droits des patients), Emmanuel Martinod (Professeur de Chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire de Coordonnateur cellule COVID-19, PCEML)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2020.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To facilitate the analysis and the management of claims related to the last Covid-19 pandemic, the DAJ of the AP–HP constituted a medical group assisted by lawyers intending to review the scientific knowledge and organizational measures during the first wave of this pandemic. This group brought together medical doctors with both scientific expertise in the main specialties requested during this viral infection and knowledge of repairing bodily damage. Based on the data provided by the hospital dashboards and the collection of hospital procedures for Covid-19 and non-Covid-19 patients, the goal of this group was to assess the level of scientific knowledge and organizational measures respectively at the start of the epidemic, its peak and at the end. During the three periods of this pandemic the main changes observed included a greater selectivity on admissions with increasing consideration on the patient's comorbidity; a continual evolution in drug management and more rigorous isolation measures with interruption of visiting rights. The target was to prevent contamination of the non-infected persons with an obsession to protect healthcare workers. The absence of selection for patients requiring intensive care for compensation of their respiratory failure forced AP–HP to double the number of intensive care beds and to refer some patients in other regions. In a context of unstable scientific knowledge and evolving organizational measures, the collection of these data should facilitate the management of claims related to Covid19 during the first wave of this pandemic and open a prospective study for the next pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2021 167","pages":"Pages 30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.meddro.2020.11.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S124673912030124X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To facilitate the analysis and the management of claims related to the last Covid-19 pandemic, the DAJ of the AP–HP constituted a medical group assisted by lawyers intending to review the scientific knowledge and organizational measures during the first wave of this pandemic. This group brought together medical doctors with both scientific expertise in the main specialties requested during this viral infection and knowledge of repairing bodily damage. Based on the data provided by the hospital dashboards and the collection of hospital procedures for Covid-19 and non-Covid-19 patients, the goal of this group was to assess the level of scientific knowledge and organizational measures respectively at the start of the epidemic, its peak and at the end. During the three periods of this pandemic the main changes observed included a greater selectivity on admissions with increasing consideration on the patient's comorbidity; a continual evolution in drug management and more rigorous isolation measures with interruption of visiting rights. The target was to prevent contamination of the non-infected persons with an obsession to protect healthcare workers. The absence of selection for patients requiring intensive care for compensation of their respiratory failure forced AP–HP to double the number of intensive care beds and to refer some patients in other regions. In a context of unstable scientific knowledge and evolving organizational measures, the collection of these data should facilitate the management of claims related to Covid19 during the first wave of this pandemic and open a prospective study for the next pandemic.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues