Exploratory Review of Urban Expansion, Coastal Vegetation Environments (CVEs) and the Paradox of Sustainability
T. A. Olatoye
求助PDF
{"title":"Exploratory Review of Urban Expansion, Coastal Vegetation Environments (CVEs) and the Paradox of Sustainability","authors":"T. A. Olatoye","doi":"10.31901/24566608.2019/67.1-3.3152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vegetation forms a fundamental proportion of resources used to determine the potential of the land on which they are sustained, unfortunately, urbanization has altered ecological systems and coastal vegetation environments all over the world, and the conservation of the endangered resource is still a serious challenge. Further, urbanization around the coastal vegetation environments is expanding at unprecedented rate, and this has resulted into more people relocating to these areas. For example, urban expansion reduces coastal vegetation, soil moisture and quality, and invariably results in poverty. From the foregoing, there is need for constant monitoring of endangered coastal ecosystems. Therefore, this paper appraises the impact, relevance perspectives threats, and challenges of coastal vegetation resources on account of urban expansion. Also, major advances and key issues relating to coastal vegetation management, as well as recommendations are discussed so as to help move the field forward. Address for correspondence: Dr. Tolulope Ayodeji Olatoye Department of Geography & Environmental Sciences, University of Fort Hare, Alice Campus, Province of the Eastern Cape, South Africa E-mail: , <201615087@ufh.ac.za> INTRODUCTION Coastal vegetation is core in ecosystem functioning and biodiversity enhancement (Brockerhoff 2017). These ecological systems rank amongst the most significant worldwide, providing several ecosystem goods and services which are central to the welfare of mankind (Adekola and Mitchell 2011), and these include the protection of the coastal ecosystem , improvement of water quality, biodiversity support, fishery nurseries, etc. Further, CVEs provide ecosystem services which relate to local climate mitigation, regulation and adaptation, food security (such as habitat provision, food supply and nurseries for seedlings and fisheries), occupational security, and an array of social/traditional benefits, scientific knowledge, ecotourism, recreation, as well as the preservation/development of spiritual and cultural values. Inspite of all these merits derived from coastal vegetation environments, ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss, which greatly undermines the life’s foundations is the abysmal phenomenon is experienced in CVEs (UNDP 2012). A great challenge to humanity, most especially the world’s poor is the loss of biodiversity and ecosystems. It is stated in literature that over 1.1 billion humans live on less than US$ 1 daily (UNSDSN 2013; FAO 2017), and they hinge directly on coastal vegetation environments for their feeding, energy needs, shelter and medical requirements, as well as ecosystem goods and services so as to sustain their livelihood (Rego 2018). Consequently, at present, over fifty percent of the world’s population (that is over 3 billion inhabitants) reside around 100 km radius of a coast, which is less than 20 percent of all landmass (UNEP 2016). Also, it is assessed that over 450 million people live around the coastal zones in Sub-Saharan Africa (Sale et al. 2014). It is also epitomized in literature that pressure resulting from anthropogenic factors in and around coastal vegetation environments (CVEs) has greatly sustained threat to vegetation, wildlife as well as economically important micro-organic resources in most developing societies, South Africa inclusive (Food and Agriculture Organization 2011; Amosu 2012). It is also elucidated in literature that the coastal environment, is the harbinger of biodiversity, as well as economic activities and leisure (Amosu 2012). For instance in South Africa, the native CVEs play germane roles regarding the stabiliJ Hum Ecol, 67(1-3): 21-30 (2019) DOI: 10.31901/24566608.2019/67.1-3.3152 © Kamla-Raj 2019 PRINT: ISSN 0970-9274 ONLINE: ISSN 2456-6608 22 TOLULOPE AYODEJI OLATOYE, AHMED MUKALAZI KALUMBA AND SONWABO PEREZ MAZINYO J Hum Ecol, 67(1-3): 21-30 (2019) zation of landscape against wind erosion, in addition to providing wildlife habitation. Further, CVEs play a critical role in the global sequestration of carbon that would otherwise remain as atmospheric CO2 and exacerbate climate change (Laffoley 2009; Nellemann 2009). These ecosystems sequester carbon, and this has culminated in improved research efforts in carbon sequestration and carbon dynamics over time (Mcleod 2011). Hence, it is imperative to restore and protect these endangered and highly fragile ecosystems, on account of the innumerable benefits accruing from the all-important, but highly threatened environment (Olatoye 2019). All over the world, it is found that rapid urbanization is a consequence of population growth. Haub (2011) opined that the human population all over the world has rapidly increased to about 7 billion people by the year 2012, and this is further projected that by year 2024, human population will not be less than 8 billion, and over 9 billion by the year 2043, with over half of these population figures living around coastal environments. As part of this development, coastal cities in the developing economies have undergone rapid urban expansion (Azadi 2011) and this has consequently culminated in tremendous burden on land use/land cover (LULC) from both unintended and unrestrained alterations (Kumar 2016). Additionally, undue pressure on ecological systems have resulted in urban sprawl in most metropolitan areas, (Laprise 2016) contributing to environmental change on the global scene (Wu 2014). Significant land use and land cover changes thus occurs in coastal cities, with population rise projected to more than 32 percent between 2015 and 2030 (Merkens 2016). These coastal cities perform important logistic, production and governance roles within the communities and regions they are found (Wei and Ye 2014). It is also projected that coastal cities have great impact on the future economic advancement of countries and larger geographic areas of the world (Roberts 2014). Various definitions have been provided for the definition of urbanization in literature. From the foregoing, an urban space (such as a metropolitan area, city or town) has been diversely defined by city administrators and the academia in terms of population density, total population size, and built-up surface areas or structures (Wu 2014). Further, the preponderance of built-up infrastructures, high population density, wideranging impervious surfaces, air pollution, altered conditions of climate and hydrology, as well as altered ecological system function and services permeate urban environments. Nevertheless, it is impracticable to epitomize all the core features and components of urban areas into one definition. Basically, the two most important factors that satisfactorily defines urban areas are extensive built-up areas and high human population. Fundamentally, these two factors directly or indirectly define the key ecological and environmental characteristics of urban systems (Wu 2014). Urban coastal vegetation helps to regulate temperature, also providing natural filter and noise absorbing functions. CVEs also improves the aesthetic and physical quality of natural resources as well as micro-climatic conditions (Patarkalashvili 2017). CVEs also promote improved value of life of urban dwellers on account of the delivery of several ecosystem goods and services, thereby enhancing physical, mental and social health, as well as improving the urban environment in general (Nesbitt 2017). Despite these innumerable merits of CVEs, little has been done to protect this fragile ecosystem, hence, the need for constant monitoring of land use and land cover changes in CVEs (Peng 2017). Thus, in order to fulfil the goals of a smart coastal city, the preponderance of illegal, unintended and arbitrary urban development to the detriment of natural coastal vegetation must be checked and the strategic development frameworks have to be strictly implemented by all stakeholders. On account of population pressure around coastal cities, it is therefore imperative to conserve and safeguard coastal vegetation across the world, as well as ensuring that ecosystem services and biodiversity function at optimum levels (Maskell et al. 2013; Sandifer et al. 2015). Despite the declining state of the world’s vegetation over the years, Barbier (2015) elucidates that millions of poor people live on coastal vegetation resources (CVEs), as well as sustaining the livelihood of over 2,500 native cultures. Additionally, FAO (2016) projected that over 2 billion people, (Not less than 40% of the population of developing countries), depend on fuelURBAN EXPANSION, COASTAL VEGETATION ENVIRONMENTS AND SUSTAINABILITY PARADOX 23 J Hum Ecol, 67(1-3): 21-30 (2019) wood for domestic purposes. To this end, it is therefore imperative to provide substitute energy sources, as well as the need to monitor and conserve CVEs so as to ensure ecosystem functioning and provisioning sustainability (Sandifer 2015). This will also ensure that the negative effects of urbanization are mitigated, in addition to reducing the harmful effects of climate change (Keenan 2015; Ibrahim et al. 2016). Besides the conservation of biodiversity, other numerous environmental functions and services are derivable from CVEs (Elmqvist et al. 2015), these include reduced soil erosion, flood and desertification control, sequestration of carbon, water supply (Adhikari 2016) and beautification of CVEs (FAO 2016). This paper therefore makes a clarion call for continued research to be undertaken, in addition to consistent monitoring and conserving our fragile CVEs, with the aim of achieving optimum functioning and service delivery of CVEs (Martinez-Harms 2015).","PeriodicalId":35217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566608.2019/67.1-3.3152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Vegetation forms a fundamental proportion of resources used to determine the potential of the land on which they are sustained, unfortunately, urbanization has altered ecological systems and coastal vegetation environments all over the world, and the conservation of the endangered resource is still a serious challenge. Further, urbanization around the coastal vegetation environments is expanding at unprecedented rate, and this has resulted into more people relocating to these areas. For example, urban expansion reduces coastal vegetation, soil moisture and quality, and invariably results in poverty. From the foregoing, there is need for constant monitoring of endangered coastal ecosystems. Therefore, this paper appraises the impact, relevance perspectives threats, and challenges of coastal vegetation resources on account of urban expansion. Also, major advances and key issues relating to coastal vegetation management, as well as recommendations are discussed so as to help move the field forward. Address for correspondence: Dr. Tolulope Ayodeji Olatoye Department of Geography & Environmental Sciences, University of Fort Hare, Alice Campus, Province of the Eastern Cape, South Africa E-mail: , <201615087@ufh.ac.za> INTRODUCTION Coastal vegetation is core in ecosystem functioning and biodiversity enhancement (Brockerhoff 2017). These ecological systems rank amongst the most significant worldwide, providing several ecosystem goods and services which are central to the welfare of mankind (Adekola and Mitchell 2011), and these include the protection of the coastal ecosystem , improvement of water quality, biodiversity support, fishery nurseries, etc. Further, CVEs provide ecosystem services which relate to local climate mitigation, regulation and adaptation, food security (such as habitat provision, food supply and nurseries for seedlings and fisheries), occupational security, and an array of social/traditional benefits, scientific knowledge, ecotourism, recreation, as well as the preservation/development of spiritual and cultural values. Inspite of all these merits derived from coastal vegetation environments, ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss, which greatly undermines the life’s foundations is the abysmal phenomenon is experienced in CVEs (UNDP 2012). A great challenge to humanity, most especially the world’s poor is the loss of biodiversity and ecosystems. It is stated in literature that over 1.1 billion humans live on less than US$ 1 daily (UNSDSN 2013; FAO 2017), and they hinge directly on coastal vegetation environments for their feeding, energy needs, shelter and medical requirements, as well as ecosystem goods and services so as to sustain their livelihood (Rego 2018). Consequently, at present, over fifty percent of the world’s population (that is over 3 billion inhabitants) reside around 100 km radius of a coast, which is less than 20 percent of all landmass (UNEP 2016). Also, it is assessed that over 450 million people live around the coastal zones in Sub-Saharan Africa (Sale et al. 2014). It is also epitomized in literature that pressure resulting from anthropogenic factors in and around coastal vegetation environments (CVEs) has greatly sustained threat to vegetation, wildlife as well as economically important micro-organic resources in most developing societies, South Africa inclusive (Food and Agriculture Organization 2011; Amosu 2012). It is also elucidated in literature that the coastal environment, is the harbinger of biodiversity, as well as economic activities and leisure (Amosu 2012). For instance in South Africa, the native CVEs play germane roles regarding the stabiliJ Hum Ecol, 67(1-3): 21-30 (2019) DOI: 10.31901/24566608.2019/67.1-3.3152 © Kamla-Raj 2019 PRINT: ISSN 0970-9274 ONLINE: ISSN 2456-6608 22 TOLULOPE AYODEJI OLATOYE, AHMED MUKALAZI KALUMBA AND SONWABO PEREZ MAZINYO J Hum Ecol, 67(1-3): 21-30 (2019) zation of landscape against wind erosion, in addition to providing wildlife habitation. Further, CVEs play a critical role in the global sequestration of carbon that would otherwise remain as atmospheric CO2 and exacerbate climate change (Laffoley 2009; Nellemann 2009). These ecosystems sequester carbon, and this has culminated in improved research efforts in carbon sequestration and carbon dynamics over time (Mcleod 2011). Hence, it is imperative to restore and protect these endangered and highly fragile ecosystems, on account of the innumerable benefits accruing from the all-important, but highly threatened environment (Olatoye 2019). All over the world, it is found that rapid urbanization is a consequence of population growth. Haub (2011) opined that the human population all over the world has rapidly increased to about 7 billion people by the year 2012, and this is further projected that by year 2024, human population will not be less than 8 billion, and over 9 billion by the year 2043, with over half of these population figures living around coastal environments. As part of this development, coastal cities in the developing economies have undergone rapid urban expansion (Azadi 2011) and this has consequently culminated in tremendous burden on land use/land cover (LULC) from both unintended and unrestrained alterations (Kumar 2016). Additionally, undue pressure on ecological systems have resulted in urban sprawl in most metropolitan areas, (Laprise 2016) contributing to environmental change on the global scene (Wu 2014). Significant land use and land cover changes thus occurs in coastal cities, with population rise projected to more than 32 percent between 2015 and 2030 (Merkens 2016). These coastal cities perform important logistic, production and governance roles within the communities and regions they are found (Wei and Ye 2014). It is also projected that coastal cities have great impact on the future economic advancement of countries and larger geographic areas of the world (Roberts 2014). Various definitions have been provided for the definition of urbanization in literature. From the foregoing, an urban space (such as a metropolitan area, city or town) has been diversely defined by city administrators and the academia in terms of population density, total population size, and built-up surface areas or structures (Wu 2014). Further, the preponderance of built-up infrastructures, high population density, wideranging impervious surfaces, air pollution, altered conditions of climate and hydrology, as well as altered ecological system function and services permeate urban environments. Nevertheless, it is impracticable to epitomize all the core features and components of urban areas into one definition. Basically, the two most important factors that satisfactorily defines urban areas are extensive built-up areas and high human population. Fundamentally, these two factors directly or indirectly define the key ecological and environmental characteristics of urban systems (Wu 2014). Urban coastal vegetation helps to regulate temperature, also providing natural filter and noise absorbing functions. CVEs also improves the aesthetic and physical quality of natural resources as well as micro-climatic conditions (Patarkalashvili 2017). CVEs also promote improved value of life of urban dwellers on account of the delivery of several ecosystem goods and services, thereby enhancing physical, mental and social health, as well as improving the urban environment in general (Nesbitt 2017). Despite these innumerable merits of CVEs, little has been done to protect this fragile ecosystem, hence, the need for constant monitoring of land use and land cover changes in CVEs (Peng 2017). Thus, in order to fulfil the goals of a smart coastal city, the preponderance of illegal, unintended and arbitrary urban development to the detriment of natural coastal vegetation must be checked and the strategic development frameworks have to be strictly implemented by all stakeholders. On account of population pressure around coastal cities, it is therefore imperative to conserve and safeguard coastal vegetation across the world, as well as ensuring that ecosystem services and biodiversity function at optimum levels (Maskell et al. 2013; Sandifer et al. 2015). Despite the declining state of the world’s vegetation over the years, Barbier (2015) elucidates that millions of poor people live on coastal vegetation resources (CVEs), as well as sustaining the livelihood of over 2,500 native cultures. Additionally, FAO (2016) projected that over 2 billion people, (Not less than 40% of the population of developing countries), depend on fuelURBAN EXPANSION, COASTAL VEGETATION ENVIRONMENTS AND SUSTAINABILITY PARADOX 23 J Hum Ecol, 67(1-3): 21-30 (2019) wood for domestic purposes. To this end, it is therefore imperative to provide substitute energy sources, as well as the need to monitor and conserve CVEs so as to ensure ecosystem functioning and provisioning sustainability (Sandifer 2015). This will also ensure that the negative effects of urbanization are mitigated, in addition to reducing the harmful effects of climate change (Keenan 2015; Ibrahim et al. 2016). Besides the conservation of biodiversity, other numerous environmental functions and services are derivable from CVEs (Elmqvist et al. 2015), these include reduced soil erosion, flood and desertification control, sequestration of carbon, water supply (Adhikari 2016) and beautification of CVEs (FAO 2016). This paper therefore makes a clarion call for continued research to be undertaken, in addition to consistent monitoring and conserving our fragile CVEs, with the aim of achieving optimum functioning and service delivery of CVEs (Martinez-Harms 2015).
城市扩张、滨海植被环境与可持续性悖论的探索性述评
植被构成了用于决定其赖以生存的土地潜力的资源的基本比例,不幸的是,城市化已经改变了世界各地的生态系统和沿海植被环境,保护濒危资源仍然是一项严峻的挑战。此外,沿海植被环境周围的城市化正在以前所未有的速度扩张,这导致更多的人迁移到这些地区。例如,城市扩张减少了沿海植被、土壤湿度和质量,必然导致贫困。鉴于上述情况,有必要不断监测濒危的沿海生态系统。因此,本文评估了城市扩张对沿海植被资源的影响、相关性、威胁和挑战。此外,还讨论了与沿海植被管理有关的主要进展和关键问题,以及建议,以帮助推动该领域的发展。通信地址:Tolulope Ayodeji Olatoye博士,南非东开普省爱丽丝校区Fort Hare大学地理与环境科学系电子邮件:,简介海岸植被是生态系统功能和生物多样性增强的核心(Brockerhoff 2017)。这些生态系统是世界上最重要的生态系统之一,提供了对人类福利至关重要的几种生态系统商品和服务(Adekola和Mitchell,2011年),其中包括保护沿海生态系统、改善水质、生物多样性支持、渔业苗圃等,CVE提供生态系统服务,涉及当地气候缓解、监管和适应、粮食安全(如栖息地提供、粮食供应和幼苗和渔业苗圃)、职业安全以及一系列社会/传统利益、科学知识、生态旅游、娱乐以及精神和文化价值的保护/发展。尽管沿海植被环境、生态系统退化和生物多样性丧失带来了所有这些好处,极大地破坏了生命的基础,但CVE中却出现了糟糕的现象(联合国开发计划署,2012年)。生物多样性和生态系统的丧失是人类,尤其是世界穷人面临的一大挑战。文献中指出,超过11亿人每天的生活费不到1美元(UNSDSN 2013;粮农组织2017),他们直接依赖沿海植被环境来满足食物、能源需求、住所和医疗需求,以及生态系统商品和服务,以维持生计(Rego 2018)。因此,目前,世界上超过50%的人口(即超过30亿居民)居住在海岸半径100公里左右,不到所有陆地面积的20%(UNEP 2016)。此外,据评估,超过4.5亿人生活在撒哈拉以南非洲的沿海地区(Sale等人,2014)。文献中也体现了沿海植被环境及其周围人为因素造成的压力对包括南非在内的大多数发展中社会的植被、野生动物以及经济上重要的微型有机资源构成了巨大的持续威胁(粮食及农业组织,2011年;阿莫苏,2012年)。文献中还阐明,沿海环境是生物多样性以及经济活动和休闲的前兆(Amosu 2012)。例如,在南非,本土CVE在稳定方面发挥着密切的作用J Hum Ecol,67(1-3):21-30(2019)DOI:10.31901/2456608.2019/67.1-3.33152©Kamla Raj 2019印刷:ISSN 0970-9274在线:ISSN 2456-6608 22 TOLULOPE AYODEJI OLATOYE,AHMED MUKALAZI KALUMBA和SONWABO PEREZ MAZINYO J Hum Ecol,67,除了提供野生动物栖息地之外。此外,CVE在全球碳固存中发挥着关键作用,否则这些碳将作为大气中的二氧化碳保留下来,并加剧气候变化(Laffoley,2009年;Nellemann,2009年)。这些生态系统封存碳,随着时间的推移,碳封存和碳动力学的研究工作得到了改善(Mcleod,2011年)。因此,必须恢复和保护这些濒危和高度脆弱的生态系统,因为至关重要但受到高度威胁的环境带来了无数好处(Olatoye 2019)。在世界各地,人们发现快速城市化是人口增长的结果。Haub(2011)认为,到2012年,全世界的人口已迅速增加到约70亿,并进一步预测到2024年,人口将不少于80亿,到2043年将超过90亿,其中一半以上的人口生活在沿海环境中。 作为这一发展的一部分,发展中经济体的沿海城市经历了快速的城市扩张(Azadi,2011年),这最终导致了土地使用/土地覆盖的巨大负担(Kumar,2016年)。此外,对生态系统的过度压力导致了大多数大都市地区的城市扩张,(Laprise 2016)导致了全球环境的变化(吴,2014)。因此,沿海城市的土地利用和土地覆盖发生了重大变化,预计2015年至2030年间人口增长率将超过32%(Merkens 2016)。这些沿海城市在其所在的社区和地区发挥着重要的物流、生产和治理作用(Wei和Ye,2014)。据预测,沿海城市对各国和世界更大地理区域的未来经济发展有着巨大影响(Roberts 2014)。文献中对城市化的定义提供了各种各样的定义。综上所述,城市管理者和学术界对城市空间(如大都市、城市或城镇)的定义在人口密度、总人口规模和建成区或结构方面各不相同(吴,2014)。此外,建成基础设施的优势、高人口密度、广泛的不透水表面、空气污染、气候和水文条件的改变以及生态系统功能和服务的改变渗透到城市环境中。然而,将城市地区的所有核心特征和组成部分集中在一个定义中是不切实际的。基本上,令人满意地定义城市地区的两个最重要因素是广泛的建成区和高人口。从根本上讲,这两个因素直接或间接地定义了城市系统的关键生态环境特征(吴,2014)。城市海岸植被有助于调节温度,同时提供自然过滤和噪音吸收功能。CVE还改善了自然资源的美学和物理质量以及微观气候条件(Patarkalashvili 2017)。CVE还通过提供多种生态系统商品和服务来提高城市居民的生活价值,从而增强身体、心理和社会健康,并改善总体城市环境(Nesbitt 2017)。尽管CVE有无数优点,但在保护这一脆弱的生态系统方面却做得很少,因此,需要不断监测CVE的土地利用和土地覆盖变化(Peng 2017)。因此,为了实现智慧沿海城市的目标,必须遏制非法、非故意和任意的城市发展对沿海自然植被的破坏,所有利益攸关方必须严格执行战略发展框架。鉴于沿海城市周围的人口压力,因此必须保护和保护世界各地的沿海植被,并确保生态系统服务和生物多样性处于最佳水平(Maskell等人,2013;Sandifer等人,2015)。尽管多年来世界植被状况不断下降,Barbier(2015)阐明,数百万穷人生活在沿海植被资源(CVE)上,并维持着2500多种本土文化的生计。此外,粮农组织(2016)预测,超过20亿人(不低于发展中国家人口的40%)依赖燃料城市扩张、沿海植被环境和可持续性准则23 J Hum Ecol,67(1-3):21-30(2019)家用木材。为此,必须提供替代能源,并需要监测和保护CVE,以确保生态系统的功能和供应的可持续性(Sandifer 2015)。这也将确保减轻城市化的负面影响,同时减少气候变化的有害影响(Keenan 2015;Ibrahim等人2016)。除了保护生物多样性,CVE还可提供其他众多的环境功能和服务(Elmqvist等人,2015),包括减少土壤侵蚀、洪水和荒漠化控制、碳固存、供水(Adhikari 2016)和美化CVE(FAO 2016)。因此,本文明确呼吁,除了持续监测和保护我们脆弱的CVE外,还应继续进行研究,以实现CVE的最佳功能和服务提供(Martinez Harms,2015)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。