Capitalism and the Future of American Classical Music Scholarship

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC AMERICAN MUSIC Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5406/19452349.40.4.24
Douglas W. Shadle
{"title":"Capitalism and the Future of American Classical Music Scholarship","authors":"Douglas W. Shadle","doi":"10.5406/19452349.40.4.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps no historical composer has sparked more public interest in recent memory than Florence Price (1888–1953). Since 2018, when Alex Ross of the New Yorker and musicologist Micaela Baranello reported on the world premiere recording of Price’s two violin concertos in expansive contextual essays, global performances of her music have skyrocketed, even despite the COVID19 pandemic. As one scholar among many endeavoring to build on biographical work by pioneers like Barbara Garvey Jackson, Mildred Denby Green, and Rae Linda Brown, I’ve come face to face with impediments to scholarship on American classical music embedded in the webs of contemporary global capitalism manifested in the classical music industry. This essay offers reflections on a few of these challenges. Documents in the Rae Linda Brown papers held at Emory University indicate that Price scholars and performers ran into significant difficulty discerning who managed the rights to Price’s catalog after her daughter’s death in 1975. By the mid1990s, however, one of Price’s grandchildren had teamed with Brown to negotiate with publishers on the Price estate’s behalf, thus solving a major quandary. During the two decades prior to Brown’s tragic death in 2017, Barbara Garvey Jackson’s boutique publishing house, ClarNan Editions, released nearly thirty editions of Price’s smaller works, while Brown herself edited Price’s Sonata in E Minor and two of her symphonies for G. Schirmer and AR Editions, respectively. Even so, a substantial percentage of Price’s catalog remained","PeriodicalId":43462,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN MUSIC","volume":"40 1","pages":"567 - 570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN MUSIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/19452349.40.4.24","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perhaps no historical composer has sparked more public interest in recent memory than Florence Price (1888–1953). Since 2018, when Alex Ross of the New Yorker and musicologist Micaela Baranello reported on the world premiere recording of Price’s two violin concertos in expansive contextual essays, global performances of her music have skyrocketed, even despite the COVID19 pandemic. As one scholar among many endeavoring to build on biographical work by pioneers like Barbara Garvey Jackson, Mildred Denby Green, and Rae Linda Brown, I’ve come face to face with impediments to scholarship on American classical music embedded in the webs of contemporary global capitalism manifested in the classical music industry. This essay offers reflections on a few of these challenges. Documents in the Rae Linda Brown papers held at Emory University indicate that Price scholars and performers ran into significant difficulty discerning who managed the rights to Price’s catalog after her daughter’s death in 1975. By the mid1990s, however, one of Price’s grandchildren had teamed with Brown to negotiate with publishers on the Price estate’s behalf, thus solving a major quandary. During the two decades prior to Brown’s tragic death in 2017, Barbara Garvey Jackson’s boutique publishing house, ClarNan Editions, released nearly thirty editions of Price’s smaller works, while Brown herself edited Price’s Sonata in E Minor and two of her symphonies for G. Schirmer and AR Editions, respectively. Even so, a substantial percentage of Price’s catalog remained
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本主义与美国古典音乐学术的未来
在最近的记忆中,也许没有哪个历史作曲家比弗洛伦斯·普莱斯(1888-1953)更能引起公众的兴趣。自2018年以来,《纽约客》的亚历克斯·罗斯和音乐学家米凯拉·巴拉内罗在大量背景文章中报道了普莱斯的两首小提琴协奏曲的全球首演录音,尽管新冠肺炎疫情肆虐,她的音乐在全球的表演仍在飙升。作为众多学者中的一员,我努力以芭芭拉·加维·杰克逊、米尔德丽德·丹比·格林和雷·琳达·布朗等先驱的传记作品为基础,在研究美国古典音乐方面遇到了障碍,这些障碍植根于古典音乐产业中表现出来的当代全球资本主义网络中。本文对其中一些挑战进行了思考。埃默里大学的雷·琳达·布朗论文中的文件表明,普莱斯的学者和表演者在1975年女儿去世后,很难辨别是谁管理了普莱斯目录的版权。然而,到了20世纪90年代中期,普莱斯的一个孙子与布朗合作,代表普莱斯庄园与出版商进行谈判,从而解决了一个重大难题。在2017年布朗不幸去世前的20年里,芭芭拉·加维·杰克逊的精品出版社ClarNan Editions发行了近30版普莱斯的小作品,而布朗本人则分别为G.Schirmer和AR Editions编辑了普莱斯的E小调奏鸣曲和她的两部交响曲。即便如此,普莱斯的目录中仍有相当大的一部分保留了下来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Now in its 28th year, American Music publishes articles on American composers, performers, publishers, institutions, events, and the music industry, as well as book and recording reviews, bibliographies, and discographies.
期刊最新文献
Is Country Music Quintessentially American? Editor's Introduction Women's Work in Music Music, Movement Culture, and the Politics of Bodily Health Significant Difference in American Music Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1