First-Stage Evaluation of a Prototype Driver Distraction Human-Machine-Interface Warning System

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Road Safety-JRS Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.33492/jrs-d-21-00049
C. Mulvihill, T. Horberry, M. Fitzharris, B. Lawrence, R. Schnittker, M. Lenné, J. Kuo, Darren Wood
{"title":"First-Stage Evaluation of a Prototype Driver Distraction Human-Machine-Interface Warning System","authors":"C. Mulvihill, T. Horberry, M. Fitzharris, B. Lawrence, R. Schnittker, M. Lenné, J. Kuo, Darren Wood","doi":"10.33492/jrs-d-21-00049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in vehicle technology permit the real-time monitoring of driver state to reduce distraction-related crashes, particularly within the heavy vehicle industry. Relatively little published research has evaluated the human machine interface (HMI) design for these systems. However, the efficacy of in-vehicle technology depends in large part on the acceptability among drivers of the system’s interface. Four variations of the HMI of a prototype multi-modal warning system developed by the authors for driver distraction were evaluated in a truck simulator with eight car drivers and six truck drivers. Driver acceptance of the HMIs was assessed using the System Acceptability Scale; and salience, comprehension and perceived effectiveness of components of the HMIs (modality, intensity of warning) were assessed using likert scales. The results showed that participants considered the HMIs to be acceptable and useful, and that the warning components were largely noticed, understood correctly, and perceived to be effective. Although this study identified no major design flaws with the recently developed HMIs, further simulator testing with a larger sample size is recommended to validate the findings. On-road evaluations to assess the impact of the HMIs on real world safety are a necessary pre-requisite for implementation.","PeriodicalId":53198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/jrs-d-21-00049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in vehicle technology permit the real-time monitoring of driver state to reduce distraction-related crashes, particularly within the heavy vehicle industry. Relatively little published research has evaluated the human machine interface (HMI) design for these systems. However, the efficacy of in-vehicle technology depends in large part on the acceptability among drivers of the system’s interface. Four variations of the HMI of a prototype multi-modal warning system developed by the authors for driver distraction were evaluated in a truck simulator with eight car drivers and six truck drivers. Driver acceptance of the HMIs was assessed using the System Acceptability Scale; and salience, comprehension and perceived effectiveness of components of the HMIs (modality, intensity of warning) were assessed using likert scales. The results showed that participants considered the HMIs to be acceptable and useful, and that the warning components were largely noticed, understood correctly, and perceived to be effective. Although this study identified no major design flaws with the recently developed HMIs, further simulator testing with a larger sample size is recommended to validate the findings. On-road evaluations to assess the impact of the HMIs on real world safety are a necessary pre-requisite for implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原型驾驶员分心人机界面预警系统的第一阶段评估
车辆技术的最新进展允许实时监测驾驶员状态,以减少与分心相关的碰撞,特别是在重型车辆行业。相对较少的已发表研究评估了这些系统的人机界面(HMI)设计。然而,车载技术的有效性在很大程度上取决于驾驶员对系统接口的可接受性。在一个有八名汽车司机和六名卡车司机的卡车模拟器中,对作者开发的用于驾驶员分心的原型多模式报警系统的HMI的四种变体进行了评估。使用系统可接受性量表评估驾驶员对HMI的接受程度;使用likert量表评估HMI各组成部分(模态、警告强度)的显著性、理解力和感知有效性。结果表明,参与者认为HMI是可接受和有用的,警告成分在很大程度上被注意到、正确理解并被认为是有效的。尽管这项研究没有发现最近开发的HMI存在重大设计缺陷,但建议使用更大样本量的进一步模拟测试来验证研究结果。评估HMI对现实世界安全的影响的道路评估是实施的必要前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Road Safety-JRS
Journal of Road Safety-JRS TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Young Provisional Drivers Who Crash Early Compare With Those Who Only Crash Later? Readability of Australian Road Safety Information for the General Public Auckland Transport’s Mass Action Pedestrian Improvement Programme Driving for Work Crashes: A Systems Analysis Insights Into Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Based on Police-Reported Statistics and Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1