From Fermented Wash to New Make Spirit: Assessing the Evolution of Flavour Characteristics of Scotch Whisky Using Lab-Scale Process Simulations

IF 3 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Beverages Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.3390/beverages9020037
Martina Daute, I. Baxter, B. Harrison, Graeme Walker, Frances Jack
{"title":"From Fermented Wash to New Make Spirit: Assessing the Evolution of Flavour Characteristics of Scotch Whisky Using Lab-Scale Process Simulations","authors":"Martina Daute, I. Baxter, B. Harrison, Graeme Walker, Frances Jack","doi":"10.3390/beverages9020037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New product development for distilled spirits frequently involves experimental trials at the laboratory scale that attempt to replicate industrial-scale production processes. This process is time-consuming and limits the number of samples that can be analysed. The aim of the present study was to conduct laboratory-scale Scotch malt whisky production experiments to determine if samples taken from earlier in the production process, that is, directly after fermentation (wash stage) or after a single distillation (low wines stage), showed similar analytical differentiation compared to samples of fresh distillates (new make spirits). Napping, a rapid sensory method, was used to assess the impact on flavour characteristics while solid-phase microextraction (SPME) gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was used to analyse volatile flavour congeners. Hierarchical Multiple Factor Analysis was used to compare the product maps from samples taken at each whisky production stage and revealed a pattern of differences across the samples that could be tracked through the process. Although the flavour descriptors and volatile congeners composition changed at each stage, there were only marginal changes in the differentiation between samples, resulting in the same sample groups being found in all analyses. RV coefficients >0.90 for all analytical comparisons and >0.74 overall showed that all product maps were highly similar to each other and showed the same overall differentiation between samples. These results indicate that the analysis of fermented malt whisky wash may provide sufficient information to proceed to larger-scale industry trials, saving time and allowing a greater number of parameters to be explored.","PeriodicalId":8773,"journal":{"name":"Beverages","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beverages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages9020037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New product development for distilled spirits frequently involves experimental trials at the laboratory scale that attempt to replicate industrial-scale production processes. This process is time-consuming and limits the number of samples that can be analysed. The aim of the present study was to conduct laboratory-scale Scotch malt whisky production experiments to determine if samples taken from earlier in the production process, that is, directly after fermentation (wash stage) or after a single distillation (low wines stage), showed similar analytical differentiation compared to samples of fresh distillates (new make spirits). Napping, a rapid sensory method, was used to assess the impact on flavour characteristics while solid-phase microextraction (SPME) gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was used to analyse volatile flavour congeners. Hierarchical Multiple Factor Analysis was used to compare the product maps from samples taken at each whisky production stage and revealed a pattern of differences across the samples that could be tracked through the process. Although the flavour descriptors and volatile congeners composition changed at each stage, there were only marginal changes in the differentiation between samples, resulting in the same sample groups being found in all analyses. RV coefficients >0.90 for all analytical comparisons and >0.74 overall showed that all product maps were highly similar to each other and showed the same overall differentiation between samples. These results indicate that the analysis of fermented malt whisky wash may provide sufficient information to proceed to larger-scale industry trials, saving time and allowing a greater number of parameters to be explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从发酵洗涤到新制作的烈酒:用实验室规模的过程模拟评估苏格兰威士忌风味特征的演变
蒸馏酒的新产品开发经常涉及实验室规模的实验试验,试图复制工业规模的生产过程。这个过程很耗时,并且限制了可以分析的样本数量。本研究的目的是进行实验室规模的苏格兰麦芽威士忌生产实验,以确定在生产过程的早期,即直接在发酵后(洗涤阶段)或单次蒸馏后(低酒阶段)采集的样品与新鲜蒸馏物(新酿造的烈酒)的样品相比,是否显示出类似的分析差异。Napping是一种快速传感方法,用于评估对风味特征的影响,而固相微萃取(SPME)气相色谱-质谱(GC–MS)用于分析挥发性风味同源物。分层多因素分析用于比较在每个威士忌生产阶段采集的样品的产品图谱,并揭示了可以在整个过程中跟踪的样品之间的差异模式。尽管风味描述符和挥发性同源物的组成在每个阶段都发生了变化,但样本之间的差异只有微小的变化,导致在所有分析中都发现了相同的样本组。所有分析比较的RV系数>0.90,总体上>0.74,表明所有产品图谱彼此高度相似,并显示出样本之间相同的总体差异。这些结果表明,对发酵麦芽威士忌洗涤液的分析可以为进行更大规模的工业试验提供足够的信息,节省时间,并允许探索更多的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Beverages
Beverages FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
68
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pilot Scale Continuous Pulsed Electric Fields Treatments for Vinification and Stabilization of Arinto and Moscatel Graúdo (Vitis vinifera L.) White Grape Varieties: Effects on Sensory and Physico-Chemical Quality of Wines The Kavalactone Content and Profile of Fiji Kava Sold on the Local Market Dissolved Oxygen Removal in Wines by Gas Sparging, Its Optimization and Chemical Impact Preliminary Evaluation of Minor Cereals as Non-Traditional Brewing Raw Materials Insight into Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant and Anti-Diabetic Properties of Rosehip (Rosa canina L.)-Based Tisanes with Addition of Hibiscus Flowers (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) and Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1