Validation of the Serbian Translation of the Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale (DPSS)

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psihologijske teme Pub Date : 2020-12-22 DOI:10.31820/pt.29.3.8
N. Rokvić
{"title":"Validation\nof the Serbian Translation of the Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale\n(DPSS)","authors":"N. Rokvić","doi":"10.31820/pt.29.3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disgust represents a feeling of revulsion and is manifested as a response to adverse stimuli and indicates a motivation to withdraw from the stimulus. Several attempts were made to measure disgust, the earliest being the Disgust Sensitivity Scale (Haidt et al., 1994) that relied on responses to disgust elicitors, and the Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale (DPSS, Cavanagh & Davey, 2000) that focused on the feeling itself, not on the strength of the reaction to specific disgust elicitors. There are two proposed models of the DPSS, one with two subscales, disgust propensity (DP) and disgust sensitivity (DS), and the other with three subscales where the self-focused/ruminative disgust (SFR) split from DS. This study aimed to validate the Serbian translation of the scale. We used two samples, a student sample (N = 437) and a social network user sample (N = 344). We used confirmatory factor analysis in both samples and the yielded results have shown that the three-factor solution is superior. The internal consistency of the subscales was marginally acceptable, while SFR subscale alpha value lagged in the social network user sample. Significant gender differences in subscale values were detected as expected, adding to the scale validity. Also, DP and DS registered a weak positive correlation with trait Neuroticism, negative affect, stress, depression, and anxiety. These results will further our claims that our translation of the DPSS is valid. In conclusion, we believe that the Serbian translation of the 12 item DPSS scale is viable for use in future research on this subject.","PeriodicalId":20858,"journal":{"name":"Psihologijske teme","volume":"29 1","pages":"631-648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologijske teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.29.3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Disgust represents a feeling of revulsion and is manifested as a response to adverse stimuli and indicates a motivation to withdraw from the stimulus. Several attempts were made to measure disgust, the earliest being the Disgust Sensitivity Scale (Haidt et al., 1994) that relied on responses to disgust elicitors, and the Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale (DPSS, Cavanagh & Davey, 2000) that focused on the feeling itself, not on the strength of the reaction to specific disgust elicitors. There are two proposed models of the DPSS, one with two subscales, disgust propensity (DP) and disgust sensitivity (DS), and the other with three subscales where the self-focused/ruminative disgust (SFR) split from DS. This study aimed to validate the Serbian translation of the scale. We used two samples, a student sample (N = 437) and a social network user sample (N = 344). We used confirmatory factor analysis in both samples and the yielded results have shown that the three-factor solution is superior. The internal consistency of the subscales was marginally acceptable, while SFR subscale alpha value lagged in the social network user sample. Significant gender differences in subscale values were detected as expected, adding to the scale validity. Also, DP and DS registered a weak positive correlation with trait Neuroticism, negative affect, stress, depression, and anxiety. These results will further our claims that our translation of the DPSS is valid. In conclusion, we believe that the Serbian translation of the 12 item DPSS scale is viable for use in future research on this subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阵风倾向和敏感度量表(DPSS)塞尔维亚语翻译的验证
厌恶表示一种厌恶感,表现为对不良刺激的反应,表示退出刺激的动机。有几次尝试测量厌恶,最早的是依赖于对厌恶引发者的反应的厌恶敏感性量表(Haidt et al.,1994),以及专注于感觉本身而不是对特定厌恶引发者反应强度的厌恶倾向和敏感性量表。DPSS有两个模型,一个有两个分量表,厌恶倾向(DP)和厌恶敏感度(DS),另一个有三个分量表(其中自我专注/沉思厌恶(SFR)从DS中分离)。本研究旨在验证该量表的塞尔维亚语翻译。我们使用了两个样本,一个是学生样本(N=437),另一个是社交网络用户样本(N=344)。我们在两个样本中都使用了验证性因素分析,得出的结果表明三因素解决方案是优越的。分量表的内部一致性在一定程度上是可以接受的,而SFR分量表α值在社交网络用户样本中滞后。如预期的那样,在分量表值上检测到显著的性别差异,增加了量表的有效性。此外,DP和DS与特质神经质、负面情绪、压力、抑郁和焦虑呈正相关。这些结果将进一步证明我们对DPSS的翻译是有效的。总之,我们认为12项DPSS量表的塞尔维亚语翻译在未来的研究中是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psihologijske teme
Psihologijske teme Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
„Ne mogu te razumjeti jer ne mogu razumjeti sebe” Tears and Mood: Intra-Individual Effects of Emotional Crying Kreativnost i izvedba Simonova zadatka Doprinos percepcije roditeljskih sukoba i konstruktivne komunikacije s partnerom kvaliteti veze Validation of the Factor Structure of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the Croatian Students Sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1