Home-delivered between-meal snacks for fragile older adults – A pilot study

Tone E. Bernchou , Lena B. Rasmussen , Pia Gaarde , Kirsten Færgeman , Barbara Voltelen , Palle Larsen
{"title":"Home-delivered between-meal snacks for fragile older adults – A pilot study","authors":"Tone E. Bernchou ,&nbsp;Lena B. Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Pia Gaarde ,&nbsp;Kirsten Færgeman ,&nbsp;Barbara Voltelen ,&nbsp;Palle Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2023.100139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fragile home-dwelling older adults are at risk of undernutrition despite receiving meal delivery services. Weight loss is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To promote healthy aging, home-delivered between-meal snacks (BMS) were tested in a region of Denmark.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experiment was set up with an intervention group (n=39, mean age 85.3) and a control group (n=32, mean age 80.8). The intervention group received BMS for 18 weeks corresponding to a weekly intake of 5600-9600 kJ and 40-112 g protein. The following outcomes were evaluated: weight, body mass index (BMI), body composition, and handgrip strength.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The intervention group had increased weight (mean ±SD) of 0.88 ±2.96 kg and fat mass of 1.56 ±2.55 kg but reduced muscle mass of 0.14 ±1.09 kg resulting in an increased BMI of 0.35 ±1.22 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. For comparison, the results of the control group were as follows: 0.29 ±2.56 kg, 0.27 ±3.65 kg, -0.04 ±1.76 kg, and 0.12 ±0.44 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The between-group mean differences were not statistically significant. The intervention group had an increased right handgrip strength of 1.40 ±5.27 kg, while a decrease of 1.41 ±3.27 kg was observed for the control group resulting in a statistically significant between-group mean difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests that BMS may reduce the risk of undernutrition and improve the functional status among fragile home-dwelling older adults, although the effect is minor. Nevertheless, the frequency of unplanned weight loss was lower within the intervention group even though the group constituted a more fragile population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032123000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fragile home-dwelling older adults are at risk of undernutrition despite receiving meal delivery services. Weight loss is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To promote healthy aging, home-delivered between-meal snacks (BMS) were tested in a region of Denmark.

Methods

A quasi-experiment was set up with an intervention group (n=39, mean age 85.3) and a control group (n=32, mean age 80.8). The intervention group received BMS for 18 weeks corresponding to a weekly intake of 5600-9600 kJ and 40-112 g protein. The following outcomes were evaluated: weight, body mass index (BMI), body composition, and handgrip strength.

Results

The intervention group had increased weight (mean ±SD) of 0.88 ±2.96 kg and fat mass of 1.56 ±2.55 kg but reduced muscle mass of 0.14 ±1.09 kg resulting in an increased BMI of 0.35 ±1.22 kg/m2. For comparison, the results of the control group were as follows: 0.29 ±2.56 kg, 0.27 ±3.65 kg, -0.04 ±1.76 kg, and 0.12 ±0.44 kg/m2. The between-group mean differences were not statistically significant. The intervention group had an increased right handgrip strength of 1.40 ±5.27 kg, while a decrease of 1.41 ±3.27 kg was observed for the control group resulting in a statistically significant between-group mean difference.

Conclusion

This study suggests that BMS may reduce the risk of undernutrition and improve the functional status among fragile home-dwelling older adults, although the effect is minor. Nevertheless, the frequency of unplanned weight loss was lower within the intervention group even though the group constituted a more fragile population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为脆弱的老年人提供的家庭餐间小吃——一项试点研究
背景:尽管接受送餐服务,脆弱的居家老年人仍面临营养不良的风险。体重减轻与发病率和死亡率增加有关。为了促进健康老龄化,在丹麦的一个地区测试了家庭提供的餐间零食(BMS)。方法设置准实验,干预组(n=39,平均年龄85.3)和对照组(n=32,平均年龄80.8)。干预组接受BMS治疗18周,相当于每周摄入5600-9600千焦和40-112克蛋白质。评估以下结果:体重、身体质量指数(BMI)、身体成分和握力。结果干预组体重增加(平均±SD) 0.88±2.96 kg,脂肪增加(1.56±2.55 kg),肌肉减少(0.14±1.09 kg), BMI增加(0.35±1.22 kg/m2)。对照组的结果分别为0.29±2.56 kg、0.27±3.65 kg、-0.04±1.76 kg、0.12±0.44 kg/m2。组间平均差异无统计学意义。干预组右手握力增加1.40±5.27 kg,对照组右手握力减少1.41±3.27 kg,组间平均差异有统计学意义。结论本研究提示BMS可降低脆弱居家老年人的营养不良风险,改善其功能状态,但效果较小。然而,在干预组中,计划外减肥的频率较低,尽管这一组是一个更脆弱的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interventions of cognitive impairment in older adults: A comprehensive review Evaluation of Minds in Motion, a fitness program for people living with dementia and their caregivers Premorbid and current intellectual performance reflects different backgrounds in patients with Parkinson's disease Baseline shock index and baroreflex function in older adults The deprivation cascade hypothesis of dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1