{"title":"Degrowth, anti-capitalism or post-archaeology? A response to Nicolas Zorzin","authors":"LouAnn Wurst","doi":"10.1017/S1380203821000052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 When employed by Oxford Archaeological Unit (now Oxford Archaeology) on the Swindon–Gloucester road scheme (1996) we were required to sign a disclaimer against road protests. This was after the Newbury bypass and M3 Winchester protests where archaeologists had been active dissenting voices. Now we found ourselves working for the road builders, who did not consider this dichotomy to be appropriate. 2 See https://blacktrowelcollective.wordpress.com. 3 See www.mola.org.uk/archaeology-and-public-benefit-ukri-future-leaders-fellowship.","PeriodicalId":45009,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Dialogues","volume":"28 1","pages":"25 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1380203821000052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Dialogues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203821000052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1 When employed by Oxford Archaeological Unit (now Oxford Archaeology) on the Swindon–Gloucester road scheme (1996) we were required to sign a disclaimer against road protests. This was after the Newbury bypass and M3 Winchester protests where archaeologists had been active dissenting voices. Now we found ourselves working for the road builders, who did not consider this dichotomy to be appropriate. 2 See https://blacktrowelcollective.wordpress.com. 3 See www.mola.org.uk/archaeology-and-public-benefit-ukri-future-leaders-fellowship.
期刊介绍：
Archaeology is undergoing rapid changes in terms of its conceptual framework and its place in contemporary society. In this challenging intellectual climate, Archaeological Dialogues has become one of the leading journals for debating innovative issues in archaeology. Firmly rooted in European archaeology, it now serves the international academic community for discussing the theories and practices of archaeology today. True to its name, debate takes a central place in Archaeological Dialogues.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
