Short Physical Performance Battery reliability and validity in adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Pub Date : 2023-02-23 DOI:10.3109/13668250.2023.2166198
I. Bidaurrazaga-Letona, J. Diz, J. Torres-Unda, I. Esain, X. Monasterio, Biotz Zulueta, C. Ayán
{"title":"Short Physical Performance Battery reliability and validity in adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability","authors":"I. Bidaurrazaga-Letona, J. Diz, J. Torres-Unda, I. Esain, X. Monasterio, Biotz Zulueta, C. Ayán","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2023.2166198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Background People with intellectual disability have poor balance skills and greater fall risk. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) provides comprehensive information on functional status and can predict fall risk. However, the reliability and validity of the SPPB have not been evaluated in people with intellectual disability. Methods Seventy-eight adults with intellectual disability were assessed using the SPPB twice. Reliability was analysed with intraclass correlation coefficient and validity was assessed against the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test and the stabilometric test using Spearman’s rho. Results Reliability was moderate to high in all SPPB components except for the semi-tandem and full tandem positions. The SPPB summary score indicated moderate test–retest reliability and showed mostly significant moderate associations with the TUG and poor agreement with the stabilometric test. Conclusions The SPPB summary score indicated high internal consistency, moderate reliability, and moderate validity when applied to adults with intellectual disability.","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2023.2166198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background People with intellectual disability have poor balance skills and greater fall risk. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) provides comprehensive information on functional status and can predict fall risk. However, the reliability and validity of the SPPB have not been evaluated in people with intellectual disability. Methods Seventy-eight adults with intellectual disability were assessed using the SPPB twice. Reliability was analysed with intraclass correlation coefficient and validity was assessed against the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test and the stabilometric test using Spearman’s rho. Results Reliability was moderate to high in all SPPB components except for the semi-tandem and full tandem positions. The SPPB summary score indicated moderate test–retest reliability and showed mostly significant moderate associations with the TUG and poor agreement with the stabilometric test. Conclusions The SPPB summary score indicated high internal consistency, moderate reliability, and moderate validity when applied to adults with intellectual disability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度至中度智力残疾成年人短体力测试的信度和有效性
摘要背景智力残疾的人平衡能力差,跌倒的风险更大。短物理性能电池(SPPB)可提供有关功能状态的全面信息,并可预测跌倒风险。然而,SPPB的可靠性和有效性尚未在智力残疾人群中进行评估。方法采用SPPB对78名智力残疾成年人进行两次评估。用组内相关系数分析了信度,并用Spearman的rho对定时上下(TUG)测试和稳定性测试的有效性进行了评估。结果除半串联和全串联位置外,所有SPPB组件的可靠性均为中高。SPPB汇总得分表明测试-再测试的可靠性中等,与TUG的相关性大多为显著-中等,与稳定性测试的一致性较差。结论SPPB总分在应用于成人智力残疾时具有较高的内部一致性、中等的可靠性和中等的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Family members use superficial justice information to evaluate performance of sheltered workshops: A warning about “cognitive shortcuts” The uniquely relational role of nurses during the closure of large residential institutions for people with intellectual disability in Australia: A qualitative study Relatives’ experiences of quality of healthcare services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in Sweden Interdisciplinarity and self-injury: Toward an inclusive research and treatment paradigm Reducing the risks of maltreatment of older adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Development of a research-based intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1