Democratization of Legislative Prospective Candidate Selection: Urgency and Its Parameters

Jamaludin Ghafur
{"title":"Democratization of Legislative Prospective Candidate Selection: Urgency and Its Parameters","authors":"Jamaludin Ghafur","doi":"10.26555/NOVELTY.V12I01.A17036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to The Problem : One of the most important functions of political parties in a representative democracy is to recruit or select candidates for public officials. One of which is the selection of legislative candidates. Through this function, political parties will determine whether a person has the quality and capacity to be a member of representative and carry out his role well. Article 241 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections mandates that political parties in selecting candidates must be democratically and openly. But, the criteria of democratic selection is not rigidly regulated because they are fully submitted to be regulated in the internal regulations of political parties. Purpose/Objective Study : This article aims to analyze the urgency of the process of selecting legislative prospective candidate democratically and to find several parameters for the democratic selection of legislative prospective candidate. Design/Methodology/Approach : This is a normative legal research. The research sources consist of primary law and secondary law. It will also use non-legal material sources. Data collection is carried out through literature study. Findings : The results of the research are: First, the urgency of the selection of candidates to be democratically because this mechanism promises some benefits for the societies, political parties, and the quality of democracy in general, i.e: The democratic process of selecting candidates is directly proportional to the satisfaction of the wider community towards the democratic system itself; and tending to produce competent and desired candidates by the public, as well as adopting more responsive policies. Second, the parameters or indicators that can be used as guidelines to determine the democratic selection of candidates will consist of 4 (four) indicators, that are: (1) Candidacy; (2) Selectorates; (3) The level of centralization/ decentralization of selection; and (4) How are candidates nominated? Paper Type : Research Article","PeriodicalId":32116,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/NOVELTY.V12I01.A17036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction to The Problem : One of the most important functions of political parties in a representative democracy is to recruit or select candidates for public officials. One of which is the selection of legislative candidates. Through this function, political parties will determine whether a person has the quality and capacity to be a member of representative and carry out his role well. Article 241 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections mandates that political parties in selecting candidates must be democratically and openly. But, the criteria of democratic selection is not rigidly regulated because they are fully submitted to be regulated in the internal regulations of political parties. Purpose/Objective Study : This article aims to analyze the urgency of the process of selecting legislative prospective candidate democratically and to find several parameters for the democratic selection of legislative prospective candidate. Design/Methodology/Approach : This is a normative legal research. The research sources consist of primary law and secondary law. It will also use non-legal material sources. Data collection is carried out through literature study. Findings : The results of the research are: First, the urgency of the selection of candidates to be democratically because this mechanism promises some benefits for the societies, political parties, and the quality of democracy in general, i.e: The democratic process of selecting candidates is directly proportional to the satisfaction of the wider community towards the democratic system itself; and tending to produce competent and desired candidates by the public, as well as adopting more responsive policies. Second, the parameters or indicators that can be used as guidelines to determine the democratic selection of candidates will consist of 4 (four) indicators, that are: (1) Candidacy; (2) Selectorates; (3) The level of centralization/ decentralization of selection; and (4) How are candidates nominated? Paper Type : Research Article
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法委员候选人选择民主化的紧迫性及其参数
问题简介:在代议制民主国家中,政党最重要的职能之一是招募或挑选公职人员候选人。其中之一是立法候选人的选择。通过这一职能,政党将决定一个人是否具备成为代表的素质和能力,并很好地履行其职责。2017年关于大选的第7号法律第241条规定,政党在选择候选人时必须民主公开。但是,民主选举的标准并没有受到严格的规定,因为它们完全服从于政党内部条例的规定。目的/目的研究:本文旨在分析民主选择立法候选人过程的紧迫性,并找出民主选择立法人选的几个参数。设计/方法/方法:这是一项规范性的法律研究。研究来源包括第一定律和第二定律。它还将使用非法律材料来源。数据收集是通过文献研究进行的。研究结果:首先,民主选举候选人的紧迫性,因为这一机制对社会、政党和总体民主质量都有好处,即:选举候选人的民主进程与更广泛的社会对民主制度本身的满意度成正比;倾向于由公众培养出合格和理想的候选人,并采取更具响应性的政策。第二,可以作为确定候选人民主选择的指导方针的参数或指标将由4(四)个指标组成,即:(1)候选人资格;(2) 选择性;(3) 选拔的集中/分散程度;以及(4)候选人是如何被提名的?论文类型:研究文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implications of Utilizing Protected Forest Areas for Geothermal Business: A Legal Analysis Local Examination in Child Custody Disputes: Judges’ Efforts to Find the Best Interests of the Child Understanding the Place of Islamic Arbitration within the Nigerian Law Legal Protection of HARA Platform Users on the Service of Electronic Data Interchange Legal Protection Policy for Obstetricians-Gynecologists in Cases of Maternal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1