Restraints Practices on Patients of the Psychiatric Wards in a Selected Hospital, Mangalore

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU Pub Date : 2023-06-16 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1769580
C. Jayaprakash, S. Sequera, Chanu Battacharya
{"title":"Restraints Practices on Patients of the Psychiatric Wards in a Selected Hospital, Mangalore","authors":"C. Jayaprakash, S. Sequera, Chanu Battacharya","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Restraints are one of the common procedures performed in various medical settings, especially intensive care units, and psychiatric wards. There are various forms of restraints, including chemical, physical, and mixed restraints. The primary reasons for using restraints are to prevent injury to the patient and others, and to reduce violent behavior in psychotic patients. Objectives  The aim of this article was to identify the types of restraints used for psychiatric patients and current restraint practices for patients in psychiatric wards of selected mental health facilities. Methods  This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among 100 psychiatric patients selected using purposive sampling techniques. An observational checklist was used to assess restraint practice in patients who met study criteria. Results  The majority of patients (44%) received chemical restraints, some (28%) received physical restraints, but a minority (28%) used mixed restraints. In terms of practice, most patients (91%) received reasonably safe restraint care. An association was found between practice of restraints and restraints type with a p -value (0.001) less than 0.05 at a significance level of 0.05. Conclusions  The development of mandatory practice protocols is critical for better nursing care.","PeriodicalId":40092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  Restraints are one of the common procedures performed in various medical settings, especially intensive care units, and psychiatric wards. There are various forms of restraints, including chemical, physical, and mixed restraints. The primary reasons for using restraints are to prevent injury to the patient and others, and to reduce violent behavior in psychotic patients. Objectives  The aim of this article was to identify the types of restraints used for psychiatric patients and current restraint practices for patients in psychiatric wards of selected mental health facilities. Methods  This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among 100 psychiatric patients selected using purposive sampling techniques. An observational checklist was used to assess restraint practice in patients who met study criteria. Results  The majority of patients (44%) received chemical restraints, some (28%) received physical restraints, but a minority (28%) used mixed restraints. In terms of practice, most patients (91%) received reasonably safe restraint care. An association was found between practice of restraints and restraints type with a p -value (0.001) less than 0.05 at a significance level of 0.05. Conclusions  The development of mandatory practice protocols is critical for better nursing care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芒格洛尔一所选定医院精神科病房患者的限制措施
摘要背景 约束是在各种医疗环境中执行的常见程序之一,尤其是重症监护室和精神病病房。有各种形式的约束,包括化学约束、物理约束和混合约束。使用约束的主要原因是防止对患者和他人造成伤害,并减少精神病患者的暴力行为。目标 本文的目的是确定用于精神病患者的约束类型,以及选定精神卫生机构精神病房中患者的当前约束做法。方法 这是一项描述性的横断面研究,使用有目的的抽样技术对100名精神病患者进行了选择。观察检查表用于评估符合研究标准的患者的约束实践。后果 大多数患者(44%)接受了化学约束,一些患者(28%)接受了物理约束,但少数患者(28%的患者)使用了混合约束。就实践而言,大多数患者(91%)接受了合理安全的约束护理。在约束实践和约束类型之间发现了相关性,p值(0.001)小于0.05,显著性水平为0.05。结论 强制性实践规程的制定对于更好的护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
85
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Postnatal Depression in Fathers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Kurdish Version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH-KU) Scale Gardner's Syndrome—A Case Report and Brief Literature Effect of Arm Ability Training on Functional Mobility and Dexterity in Hemiparetic Subjects Hepatocellular Carcinoma Presenting as Extension of Tumor Thrombus into the Right Atrium from the Portal Vein through Inferior Vena Cava Treated with Chemoembolization: A Rare Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1