Implementation of Ergonomics Approach in Sociology Learning to Decrease Physiological Disorders of Student Online Learning

I. W. Suarjana, Ferdinand Kerebungu, Siti Fathimah
{"title":"Implementation of Ergonomics Approach in Sociology Learning to Decrease Physiological Disorders of Student Online Learning","authors":"I. W. Suarjana, Ferdinand Kerebungu, Siti Fathimah","doi":"10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online learning activities carried out by students spend several hours a day in front of computers and smartphones. If the activities in this learning are not aligned with the ergonomic approach in each student's activity, of course, it will cause subjective fatigue experienced by students. This study aims to determine the influence of the implementation of the ergonomic approach on sociology learning on the decrease in physiological disorders assessed from subjective fatigue in high school students, especially in class XI. This research is an experimental study with treatment by subject design. The target population in this study was all students enrolled in SMAN 3 Tondano, while the affordable population was students who received sociology subjects. The research sample was 30 students. The research instrument used was a questionnaire of 30 items of rating scale to assess subjective fatigue. Data analysis used through descriptive tests, data normality tests, and T-tests using SPSS 25 for IOS analysis. The results showed that the difference in the average subjective fatigue before the learning process between the control period and the experimental period was 0,40 or the difference only reached 1,27%. The difference in the average subjective fatigue after the learning process between the control and experimental periods is 31,44, or the difference reached 37.36%. The results of the different tests showed a meaningful difference (p0.05). The difference in subjective fatigue reduction between the control and experimental periods reached 31.04 (62.18%). Therefore, it can be concluded that implementing an ergonomic approach to sociology learning can reduce subjective complaints in the learning process so that students avoid health problems and physiological disorders in the form of physical fatigue.","PeriodicalId":34307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online learning activities carried out by students spend several hours a day in front of computers and smartphones. If the activities in this learning are not aligned with the ergonomic approach in each student's activity, of course, it will cause subjective fatigue experienced by students. This study aims to determine the influence of the implementation of the ergonomic approach on sociology learning on the decrease in physiological disorders assessed from subjective fatigue in high school students, especially in class XI. This research is an experimental study with treatment by subject design. The target population in this study was all students enrolled in SMAN 3 Tondano, while the affordable population was students who received sociology subjects. The research sample was 30 students. The research instrument used was a questionnaire of 30 items of rating scale to assess subjective fatigue. Data analysis used through descriptive tests, data normality tests, and T-tests using SPSS 25 for IOS analysis. The results showed that the difference in the average subjective fatigue before the learning process between the control period and the experimental period was 0,40 or the difference only reached 1,27%. The difference in the average subjective fatigue after the learning process between the control and experimental periods is 31,44, or the difference reached 37.36%. The results of the different tests showed a meaningful difference (p0.05). The difference in subjective fatigue reduction between the control and experimental periods reached 31.04 (62.18%). Therefore, it can be concluded that implementing an ergonomic approach to sociology learning can reduce subjective complaints in the learning process so that students avoid health problems and physiological disorders in the form of physical fatigue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社会学学习中实施工效学方法减少学生在线学习的生理障碍
学生们每天在电脑和智能手机前进行几个小时的在线学习活动。当然,如果这种学习中的活动与每个学生活动中的人体工程学方法不一致,就会导致学生感到主观疲劳。本研究旨在确定在社会学学习中实施人机工程学方法对高中生,尤其是XI班学生主观疲劳评估的生理障碍减少的影响。本研究是一项实验性研究,采用受试者设计治疗。本研究的目标人群是SMAN 3 Tondano的所有学生,而负担得起的人群是接受社会学科目的学生。研究样本为30名学生。所用的研究工具是一份由30项评分量表组成的问卷,用于评估主观疲劳。通过描述性检验、数据正态性检验和使用SPSS 25进行IOS分析的T检验进行数据分析。结果表明,对照组和实验组在学习过程前的平均主观疲劳度差异为0.40,或仅达到1.27%。对照组和实验组在学习过程后的平均主观疲劳程度差异为31,44,或差异达到37.36%。不同测试的结果显示出有意义的差异(p0.05)。对照组和试验组在主观疲劳减轻程度上的差异达到31.04(62.18%)。因此,可以得出结论,在社会学学习中实施人机工程学方法可以减少学习过程中的主观抱怨,从而避免学生以身体疲劳的形式出现健康问题和生理障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving Interpersonal Communication Skills through Group Guidance with Assertive Training Techniques Barrier Analysis in Implementing Macapat Song Learning as Cultural Preservation Student Engagement Among Undergraduate Students in Southeast Asia: Systematic Literature Review VARK-based Chemistry Learning to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Learning Molecular Geometry Duolingo Application for Advancing English Speaking Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1