Boots on the ground: Foreign direct investment by born digital firms

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1474
Maximilian Stallkamp, Liang Chen, Sali Li
{"title":"Boots on the ground: Foreign direct investment by born digital firms","authors":"Maximilian Stallkamp,&nbsp;Liang Chen,&nbsp;Sali Li","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Recent global strategy research on born digital firms (i.e., firms with digital products distributed through digital channels) has paid only limited attention to the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the internationalization of such firms. We argue that exploiting digital technologies requires a range of complementary, non-digital resources. Born digitals typically deploy FDI when large cultural and geographic distances limit the fungibility and scalability of such complementary resources, leading to a <i>positive</i> relationship between distance (cultural and geographic) and FDI. The positive distance effect is moderated by business model type. Using a sample of US-based born digital firms with over 800 FDIs, we find support for our hypotheses and contribute an important empirical baseline to recent discussions of digitalization in global strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Companies selling digital products (e.g., software, cloud-based services) are theoretically able to offer their products in foreign markets through internet-based channels, without ever setting foot in a foreign country. And yet, many “born digital” firms establish a physical presence in foreign markets by undertaking foreign direct investment (FDI). This phenomenon remains insufficiently explained. We argue that FDI can supply important complementary resources that help exploit and monetize digital assets in foreign markets. Using data from over 800 FDI projects, we show that FDI is more likely to occur if the foreign market is far away or culturally very different from the company's home country, and that the strength of this relationship differs among B2C and B2B business models.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":"13 4","pages":"805-829"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gsj.1474","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research Summary

Recent global strategy research on born digital firms (i.e., firms with digital products distributed through digital channels) has paid only limited attention to the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the internationalization of such firms. We argue that exploiting digital technologies requires a range of complementary, non-digital resources. Born digitals typically deploy FDI when large cultural and geographic distances limit the fungibility and scalability of such complementary resources, leading to a positive relationship between distance (cultural and geographic) and FDI. The positive distance effect is moderated by business model type. Using a sample of US-based born digital firms with over 800 FDIs, we find support for our hypotheses and contribute an important empirical baseline to recent discussions of digitalization in global strategy.

Managerial Summary

Companies selling digital products (e.g., software, cloud-based services) are theoretically able to offer their products in foreign markets through internet-based channels, without ever setting foot in a foreign country. And yet, many “born digital” firms establish a physical presence in foreign markets by undertaking foreign direct investment (FDI). This phenomenon remains insufficiently explained. We argue that FDI can supply important complementary resources that help exploit and monetize digital assets in foreign markets. Using data from over 800 FDI projects, we show that FDI is more likely to occur if the foreign market is far away or culturally very different from the company's home country, and that the strength of this relationship differs among B2C and B2B business models.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脚踏实地:天生的数字公司的外国直接投资
最近关于数字企业(即通过数字渠道销售数字产品的企业)的全球战略研究,对外国直接投资(FDI)在这些企业国际化中的作用关注有限。我们认为,利用数字技术需要一系列互补的非数字资源。当巨大的文化和地理距离限制了这种互补资源的可替代性和可扩展性时,天生的数字通常会部署FDI,从而导致距离(文化和地理)与FDI之间的正相关关系。正向距离效应受商业模式类型的调节。我们以拥有800多家外国直接投资的美国数字化公司为样本,发现我们的假设得到了支持,并为最近关于数字化在全球战略中的讨论提供了重要的经验基线。销售数字产品(如软件、基于云的服务)的公司理论上可以通过基于互联网的渠道在国外市场提供产品,而无需踏足国外。然而,许多“天生数字化”的公司通过外国直接投资(FDI)在国外市场建立了实体存在。这一现象仍然没有得到充分的解释。我们认为,外国直接投资可以提供重要的补充资源,有助于在国外市场上开发和货币化数字资产。通过对800多个FDI项目的数据分析,我们发现,如果外国市场距离公司所在国较远,或者在文化上与公司所在国差异很大,那么外国直接投资更有可能发生,而且这种关系的强弱在B2C和B2B商业模式中有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC A perspective on three trade-offs of blockchain technology for the global strategy of the MNC Issue Information - TOC Inward FDI and local firms' political connections in emerging markets: Evidence from China Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1