George Miller’s “old-fashioned Hollywood studio”: corporate authorship at Kennedy Miller, 1981–1991

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION New Review of Film and Television Studies Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1080/17400309.2023.2246351
James Douglas
{"title":"George Miller’s “old-fashioned Hollywood studio”: corporate authorship at Kennedy Miller, 1981–1991","authors":"James Douglas","doi":"10.1080/17400309.2023.2246351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Australia’s George Miller, director of the Mad Max films and others, has an international reputation as a singular creative force. But this reputation overlooks key facts about Miller’s career and working methods, including his co-founding and stewardship of the production company Kennedy Miller (now Kennedy Miller Mitchell), which organized production along collaborative and collective lines. In this article, I undertake an organizational analysis of Kennedy Miller from 1981 to 1991, the period that led Australian film scholars to describe the firm as akin to a classical Hollywood studio operation. I argue that just as we recognize classical Hollywood studios as possessing a collective ‘genius’ that delimits individual claims to authorship, so should we understand Kennedy Miller in this period as possessing a corporate authorship over its film and television production. I locate this strong ‘house’ identity in the firm’s organizational structure, its distinctive culture of ‘comprehensivism’, its collaborative creative procedures, and in the discourses of publicity and critical reception that surrounded its output. I conclude by contending that this understanding of Kennedy Miller’s corporate authorship requires that we reframe our understanding of Miller’s practice to account for his role in this collaborative structure.","PeriodicalId":43549,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2023.2246351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Australia’s George Miller, director of the Mad Max films and others, has an international reputation as a singular creative force. But this reputation overlooks key facts about Miller’s career and working methods, including his co-founding and stewardship of the production company Kennedy Miller (now Kennedy Miller Mitchell), which organized production along collaborative and collective lines. In this article, I undertake an organizational analysis of Kennedy Miller from 1981 to 1991, the period that led Australian film scholars to describe the firm as akin to a classical Hollywood studio operation. I argue that just as we recognize classical Hollywood studios as possessing a collective ‘genius’ that delimits individual claims to authorship, so should we understand Kennedy Miller in this period as possessing a corporate authorship over its film and television production. I locate this strong ‘house’ identity in the firm’s organizational structure, its distinctive culture of ‘comprehensivism’, its collaborative creative procedures, and in the discourses of publicity and critical reception that surrounded its output. I conclude by contending that this understanding of Kennedy Miller’s corporate authorship requires that we reframe our understanding of Miller’s practice to account for his role in this collaborative structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乔治·米勒的“老式好莱坞工作室”:肯尼迪·米勒的企业作者,1981–1991
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Flowers, concrete, water: care and precarity in Tsai Ming-liang’s I Don’t Want to Sleep Alone (2006) The Australian film revival: 1970s, 1980s, and beyond Transformational ethics of film: thinking the cinemakeover in the film-philosophy debate A note of introduction Starmaker: David O. Selznick and the production of stars in the Hollywood studio system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1