Debt or Profit Shifting? Assessment of Corporate Tax Avoidance Practices Across Lithuanian Companies

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS Central European Business Review Pub Date : 2021-10-31 DOI:10.18267/j.cebr.290
Egidijus Kundelis, Renata Legenzova, Julijonas Kartanas
{"title":"Debt or Profit Shifting? Assessment of Corporate Tax Avoidance Practices Across Lithuanian Companies","authors":"Egidijus Kundelis, Renata Legenzova, Julijonas Kartanas","doi":"10.18267/j.cebr.290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax avoidance became a frequently observed practice in a global business environment. Multinational enterprises (MNEs) employ differences between statutory tax rates of their home countries and countries of their subsidiaries, aiming to achieve the effective tax rate being lower than the statutory one. MNEs enable tax avoidance practices via multiple channels, transfer pricing and debt shifting being among the most popular among them. The goal of this article is to evaluate if MNEs operating in Lithuania, a small open economy of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), are engaging in tax avoidance practices, and if yes, what channel debt shifting profit shifting or both are employed. Our research is built on the data for the years 2010–2018 and analyses 3,563 MNEs and local companies operating in Lithuania. Results of the conducted regression analysis rejected the impact of differences in tax rates between MNEs and their subsidiaries in Lithuania on their leverage. Therefore debt shifting across the sample companies was not evident. On the contrary, analysis of profit shifting evidence among sample companies proved the significant influence of transfer mispricing practices on earnings of Lithuanian subsidiaries of MNEs’. Such results may imply that in Lithuania, corporate tax avoidance of MNEs occurs via the channel of profit shifting rather than debt shifting. We suggest that this is related to the specifics of small economies commonly characterised by lower tax rates, underdeveloped financial markets and lower tax avoidance costs. Implications for Central European audience: Previous tax avoidance and profit shifting research mainly analysed the United Kingdom, Germany and other large countries in Europe, leaving a gap in research on small economies, especially those in CEE. Lithuania, similar to the other CEE open economies, is competing for attracting foreign investment, which makes it relevant to understand if and how the country’s tax system is exploited in the corporate governance practices of MNEs.","PeriodicalId":37276,"journal":{"name":"Central European Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tax avoidance became a frequently observed practice in a global business environment. Multinational enterprises (MNEs) employ differences between statutory tax rates of their home countries and countries of their subsidiaries, aiming to achieve the effective tax rate being lower than the statutory one. MNEs enable tax avoidance practices via multiple channels, transfer pricing and debt shifting being among the most popular among them. The goal of this article is to evaluate if MNEs operating in Lithuania, a small open economy of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), are engaging in tax avoidance practices, and if yes, what channel debt shifting profit shifting or both are employed. Our research is built on the data for the years 2010–2018 and analyses 3,563 MNEs and local companies operating in Lithuania. Results of the conducted regression analysis rejected the impact of differences in tax rates between MNEs and their subsidiaries in Lithuania on their leverage. Therefore debt shifting across the sample companies was not evident. On the contrary, analysis of profit shifting evidence among sample companies proved the significant influence of transfer mispricing practices on earnings of Lithuanian subsidiaries of MNEs’. Such results may imply that in Lithuania, corporate tax avoidance of MNEs occurs via the channel of profit shifting rather than debt shifting. We suggest that this is related to the specifics of small economies commonly characterised by lower tax rates, underdeveloped financial markets and lower tax avoidance costs. Implications for Central European audience: Previous tax avoidance and profit shifting research mainly analysed the United Kingdom, Germany and other large countries in Europe, leaving a gap in research on small economies, especially those in CEE. Lithuania, similar to the other CEE open economies, is competing for attracting foreign investment, which makes it relevant to understand if and how the country’s tax system is exploited in the corporate governance practices of MNEs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
债务还是利润转移?立陶宛公司避税行为评估
避税已成为全球商业环境中常见的做法。跨国企业采用本国和子公司所在国法定税率之间的差异,旨在实现低于法定税率的有效税率。跨国公司通过多种渠道实现避税行为,其中最受欢迎的是转让定价和债务转移。本文的目的是评估在立陶宛(中欧和东欧的一个小型开放经济体)运营的跨国公司是否从事避税行为,如果是,采用何种渠道进行债务转移利润转移或两者兼有。我们的研究基于2010-2018年的数据,分析了3563家跨国公司和在立陶宛运营的当地公司。进行的回归分析结果否定了跨国公司及其在立陶宛的子公司之间税率差异对其杠杆率的影响。因此,样本公司之间的债务转移并不明显。相反,对样本公司利润转移证据的分析证明,转让错误定价做法对跨国公司立陶宛子公司的收益产生了重大影响。这些结果可能意味着,在立陶宛,跨国公司的企业避税是通过利润转移而非债务转移的渠道进行的。我们认为,这与小型经济体的具体情况有关,这些经济体通常以较低的税率、不发达的金融市场和较低的避税成本为特征。对中欧受众的影响:以前的避税和利润转移研究主要分析了英国、德国和其他欧洲大国,在对小型经济体,特别是中东欧国家的研究中留下了空白。与其他中东欧开放经济体类似,立陶宛正在竞争吸引外国投资,这使得了解跨国公司的公司治理实践中是否以及如何利用该国的税收制度变得重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Business Review
Central European Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Social Media Word of Mouth and Masstige Purchase Behaviour Do Global Disruptive Events Induce Herding Behaviour during Upward and Downward Market Movements? The Evidence from Nordic and Baltic Stock Markets Data Analysis in Demand Forecasting: A Case Study of Poetry Book Sales in the European Area Identifying Positioning Axes for Building Brand Equity in Cork Fashion Products Dynamic Panel Estimation of the Deaton Paradox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1