Proposal of a Scenario Planning Process and Co-Design Tool for Developing a User-Centered Future Policy Agenda

Q1 Arts and Humanities Archives of Design Research Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.167
S. Park, Yoori Koo
{"title":"Proposal of a Scenario Planning Process and Co-Design Tool for Developing a User-Centered Future Policy Agenda","authors":"S. Park, Yoori Koo","doi":"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background As uncertainties increase after COVID-19, the importance of establishing strategies and policies through future predictions at the national level is increasing. Accordingly, advanced overseas research institutes are discovering near-future policy agendas by incorporating design, participatory, and human-centered approaches into foresight, especially using design thinking as a problem-solving process and mindset. On the other hand, in the case of South Korea, there is still not enough design thinking methodology that can be used in the policy field for future prediction. Therefore, this study aims to define processes and core activities for various stakeholders participating in policy making to develop scenarios from an integrated and future perspective, and to propose a mindset, a future response policy design process, and a co-design toolkit. Methods This study is divided into a literature review, a service program, and toolkit development through co-creation workshops for policy researchers and the proposal of a design thinking-based future policymaking process. Through the literature review, core processes and activities based on foresight and scenario planning were derived, and design thinking-based foresight mindset themes including user orientation, integration, autonomy, openness, and future orientation were derived. In addition, based on the limitations of scenario planning for experts, the necessity of design thinking in foresight was investigated. Next, a co-design toolkit was developed to propose a practical scenario planning workshop service, and a study was conducted to verify this through a co-creation workshop for policy researchers. Results In order to find national-level near-future policy agendas, a design thinking-based future policymaking process was proposed so that policy researchers can develop scenarios based on user-centered, integrated, and future perspectives. The process was visualized using blue print, and four steps for participatory workshop operation, eight activities, 10 co-design tools, and five theme-based mindsets to utilize them were structured in terms of the interaction between service operators and participants.","PeriodicalId":52137,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Design Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background As uncertainties increase after COVID-19, the importance of establishing strategies and policies through future predictions at the national level is increasing. Accordingly, advanced overseas research institutes are discovering near-future policy agendas by incorporating design, participatory, and human-centered approaches into foresight, especially using design thinking as a problem-solving process and mindset. On the other hand, in the case of South Korea, there is still not enough design thinking methodology that can be used in the policy field for future prediction. Therefore, this study aims to define processes and core activities for various stakeholders participating in policy making to develop scenarios from an integrated and future perspective, and to propose a mindset, a future response policy design process, and a co-design toolkit. Methods This study is divided into a literature review, a service program, and toolkit development through co-creation workshops for policy researchers and the proposal of a design thinking-based future policymaking process. Through the literature review, core processes and activities based on foresight and scenario planning were derived, and design thinking-based foresight mindset themes including user orientation, integration, autonomy, openness, and future orientation were derived. In addition, based on the limitations of scenario planning for experts, the necessity of design thinking in foresight was investigated. Next, a co-design toolkit was developed to propose a practical scenario planning workshop service, and a study was conducted to verify this through a co-creation workshop for policy researchers. Results In order to find national-level near-future policy agendas, a design thinking-based future policymaking process was proposed so that policy researchers can develop scenarios based on user-centered, integrated, and future perspectives. The process was visualized using blue print, and four steps for participatory workshop operation, eight activities, 10 co-design tools, and five theme-based mindsets to utilize them were structured in terms of the interaction between service operators and participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为制定以用户为中心的未来政策议程而提出的情景规划过程和联合设计工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Design Research
Archives of Design Research Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Archives of Design Research (ADR) is an international journal publishing original research in the field of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interaction design, space design, and service design. It also invites research outcomes from design-related interdisciplinary fields such as the humanities, arts, technology, society and business. It is an open-access journal, publishing four issues per year. Currently papers are published in both English and Korean with an English abstract. ADR aims to build a strong foundation of knowledge in design through the introduction of basic, applied and clinical research. ADR serves as a venue and platform to archive and transfer fundamental design theories, methods, tools and cases. Research areas covered in the journal include: -Design Theory and its Methodology -Design Philosophy, Ethics, Values, and Issues -Design Education -Design Management and Strategy -Sustainability, Culture, History, and Societal Design -Human Behaviors, Perception, and Emotion -Semantics, Aesthetics and Experience in Design -Interaction and Interface Design -Design Tools and New Media -Universal Design/Inclusive Design -Design Creativity -Design Projects and Case Studies
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Design Friction for Mobile Service UI based on the Sensitivity of Personal Information Types Elements and Systematization of ‘Reading Picture’ in Textless Picture Books through Semiotics The Effect of Advertising Types in Mobile Marketing Design on Consumer Advertisement Acceptability and Purchase Intention The Design of an AI Care Robot Based on Intimacy for the Emotional Stability of the Elderly Reconstructing the Content and Context of the KBS Special Feature “The World Is in an Era of Design Revolution”(1983)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1