The Russian War against Ukraine: Cyclic History vs Fatal Geography

Q2 Arts and Humanities EastWest Journal of Ukrainian Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.21226/ewjus711
V. Kravchenko
{"title":"The Russian War against Ukraine: Cyclic History vs Fatal Geography","authors":"V. Kravchenko","doi":"10.21226/ewjus711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History seems to be repeating itself, not as farce but as yet another tragedy. It reveals many of its driving forces at turning points. Those who manage to notice them, get the opportunity to rethink the past from a different perspective. The Russian-Ukrainian ongoing war of 2022 is one such fateful event. I am confident it will start a new chapter not only in history but also in the historiography of Ukrainian-Russian relations. Historians are usually more comfortable when they keep a distance from the object of their studies. I have no such distance; I am a deeply involved observer. When this essay is published, a reader will be better informed than the author about the course of events in Ukraine. However, although many details and aspects of the war remain in the shadow, I have a strong feeling of déjà vu, in particular when it comes to Russia. Tibor Szamuely once stressed: “Of all the burdens Russia has had to bear, heaviest and most relentless of all has been the weight of her past” (qtd. in Hedlund 267). The burden is heavy indeed because Russian history is cyclical. Over and over, Russia reproduces similar patterns of political, social, and cultural life that grew from the old Byzantine matrix. The persistence of geopolitical and imperial-religious foundations in Russian identity is truly impressive. During upheavals, a thin layer of Western polish peels off the Russian face, and she turns to Europe her “ugly Asian mug,” as Aleksandr Blok put it in 1918 (Blok 79).1 This is when the real, inner (glubinnaia) Russia reveals herself in the gloomy carcass of the Muscovite Tsardom. The “inner” Russia never was and never will be part of Europe. It always was a “garrison state,” a citadel of Orthodoxy, which remained in a state of permanent war both at its borders and beyond. It is to this Russia that Putin appeals when he calls his subjects to unmask “national traitors” who are guilty of looking to the West. Such xenophobic rhetoric at the highest political level has not been heard since Stalin’s campaign against the “rootless cosmopolites.” However, it is not difficult to find similar antiWestern paroxysms of hatred in each epoch of Russian history. The structure of Russian history has not changed since the Middle Ages. The same may be","PeriodicalId":31621,"journal":{"name":"EastWest Journal of Ukrainian Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EastWest Journal of Ukrainian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21226/ewjus711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

History seems to be repeating itself, not as farce but as yet another tragedy. It reveals many of its driving forces at turning points. Those who manage to notice them, get the opportunity to rethink the past from a different perspective. The Russian-Ukrainian ongoing war of 2022 is one such fateful event. I am confident it will start a new chapter not only in history but also in the historiography of Ukrainian-Russian relations. Historians are usually more comfortable when they keep a distance from the object of their studies. I have no such distance; I am a deeply involved observer. When this essay is published, a reader will be better informed than the author about the course of events in Ukraine. However, although many details and aspects of the war remain in the shadow, I have a strong feeling of déjà vu, in particular when it comes to Russia. Tibor Szamuely once stressed: “Of all the burdens Russia has had to bear, heaviest and most relentless of all has been the weight of her past” (qtd. in Hedlund 267). The burden is heavy indeed because Russian history is cyclical. Over and over, Russia reproduces similar patterns of political, social, and cultural life that grew from the old Byzantine matrix. The persistence of geopolitical and imperial-religious foundations in Russian identity is truly impressive. During upheavals, a thin layer of Western polish peels off the Russian face, and she turns to Europe her “ugly Asian mug,” as Aleksandr Blok put it in 1918 (Blok 79).1 This is when the real, inner (glubinnaia) Russia reveals herself in the gloomy carcass of the Muscovite Tsardom. The “inner” Russia never was and never will be part of Europe. It always was a “garrison state,” a citadel of Orthodoxy, which remained in a state of permanent war both at its borders and beyond. It is to this Russia that Putin appeals when he calls his subjects to unmask “national traitors” who are guilty of looking to the West. Such xenophobic rhetoric at the highest political level has not been heard since Stalin’s campaign against the “rootless cosmopolites.” However, it is not difficult to find similar antiWestern paroxysms of hatred in each epoch of Russian history. The structure of Russian history has not changed since the Middle Ages. The same may be
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯对乌克兰战争:循环历史与致命地理
历史似乎在重演,不是闹剧,而是又一场悲剧。它揭示了它在转折点上的许多驱动力。那些设法注意到他们的人,有机会从不同的角度重新思考过去。2022年正在进行的俄乌战争就是这样一场灾难性事件。我相信,它不仅将开启历史的新篇章,也将开启乌克兰与俄罗斯关系史学的新篇章。当历史学家与研究对象保持距离时,他们通常会感到更自在。我没有这样的距离;我是一个深入的观察者。当这篇文章发表时,读者将比作者更好地了解乌克兰的事态发展。然而,尽管战争的许多细节和方面仍处于阴影之中,但我有一种强烈的似曾相识的感觉,尤其是当谈到俄罗斯时。Tibor Szamely曾强调:“在俄罗斯不得不承受的所有负担中,最沉重、最无情的是她过去的重量”(第267页)。负担确实很重,因为俄罗斯的历史是周期性的。俄罗斯一次又一次地再现了从古老的拜占庭帝国发展而来的类似的政治、社会和文化生活模式。俄罗斯身份认同中地缘政治和帝国宗教基础的持续存在确实令人印象深刻。在动乱期间,一层薄薄的西方抛光剂从俄罗斯人的脸上剥落,她把自己的“丑陋的亚洲杯”转向了欧洲,正如亚历山大·布洛克在1918年(布洛克79)所说。“内在”的俄罗斯过去和将来都不是欧洲的一部分。它一直是一个“驻军国家”,一个东正教的堡垒,在其边境和其他地方都处于永久战争状态。当普京呼吁他的臣民揭露那些向西方看错的“国家叛徒”时,他正是向这个俄罗斯发出呼吁。自斯大林反对“无根世界主义”运动以来,这种最高政治级别的仇外言论从未被听到过。然而,在俄罗斯历史的每个时代都不难发现类似的反西方仇恨爆发。自中世纪以来,俄罗斯历史的结构一直没有改变。可能也是如此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EastWest Journal of Ukrainian Studies
EastWest Journal of Ukrainian Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Resisting Russification in Soviet Ukraine through Literary Translation: The Voice of Mykola Lukash Review of Serhii Plokhy. The Man with the Poison Gun: A Cold War Spy Story. From the Editor-in-Chief: Upcoming Changes Media Systems in Unrecognized States: “People’s Media” in “People’s Republics” Tackling Iaroslav Hrytsak’s Magnum Opus Fifteen Years On
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1