{"title":"Intentional Professional Learning Design: Models, Tools, and the Synergies they Produce Supporting Teacher Growth","authors":"V. Mills, C. Harrison","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2020.1766961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The need and desire to understand and adopt formative assessment practices remain high on the agenda at all levels of educational systems around the world. To advance teachers’ use of formative assessment, research attention also needs to be paid to (a) understanding the challenges teachers face when asked to utilize formative assessment practices in subject-specific content areas and (b) to the development of appropriate and sufficiently powerful professional learning designs that can enable change for teachers. To begin addressing these needs, this paper offers a close examination of an intentionally designed professional learning (PL) series to help middle and high school Algebra I teachers understand the formative assessment process and then track and advance their classroom practice. The professional learning design, in this case, is based on a collaborative and formative approach to classroom practice and teacher change with high school mathematics teachers. Together, the PL model and tools provide a formative framework that bridges the theory-practice divide enabling teachers to conceptualize and then plan for, reflect on, and revise the ways in which new formative assessment practices are implemented in their classrooms. Through an analysis of the affordances and constraints of the PL design in practice, this paper provides insights into how discipline-specific professional learning can be better developed and supported throughout the teacher growth process.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"25 1","pages":"331 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766961","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT The need and desire to understand and adopt formative assessment practices remain high on the agenda at all levels of educational systems around the world. To advance teachers’ use of formative assessment, research attention also needs to be paid to (a) understanding the challenges teachers face when asked to utilize formative assessment practices in subject-specific content areas and (b) to the development of appropriate and sufficiently powerful professional learning designs that can enable change for teachers. To begin addressing these needs, this paper offers a close examination of an intentionally designed professional learning (PL) series to help middle and high school Algebra I teachers understand the formative assessment process and then track and advance their classroom practice. The professional learning design, in this case, is based on a collaborative and formative approach to classroom practice and teacher change with high school mathematics teachers. Together, the PL model and tools provide a formative framework that bridges the theory-practice divide enabling teachers to conceptualize and then plan for, reflect on, and revise the ways in which new formative assessment practices are implemented in their classrooms. Through an analysis of the affordances and constraints of the PL design in practice, this paper provides insights into how discipline-specific professional learning can be better developed and supported throughout the teacher growth process.
期刊介绍:
Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.