Neo-colonialism in Africa and the Cases of Turkey and Iran

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES Insight on Africa Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI:10.1177/0975087819845197
Glen Segell
{"title":"Neo-colonialism in Africa and the Cases of Turkey and Iran","authors":"Glen Segell","doi":"10.1177/0975087819845197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Africa is suffering from neo-colonialism for the same reasons that it suffered from colonialism. Neo-colonialism is the regressive impact of unregulated forms of aid, trade and foreign direct investment; and the collaboration of African leaders with foreign leaders to ensure that the interests of both are met with little concern for the development, sustainability and poverty reduction and wellbeing in African countries. The relationship is asymmetrical or at the cost of African states and their people, who are dependent rather that inter-dependent and do not profit through development or sustainability. They face destruction of their culture, religion and education through continued advancement of foreign culture, religion and language to supplant the African and growing radicalisation of the population. This is elaborated thematically under four headings: Africa the colonial dream, the emergence of neo-colonialism, the proponents of neo-colonialism and the element of religion. Evidence of Middle East states are shown as neo-colonialists in Africa discussed under the cases of Turkey and Iran. The motivation of the former is for the purposes of economics and the latter is for the purposes of religion. Both benefit also through status by projecting their influence as growing global actors. The breakdown of African nations rather than their positive construction and development is increasingly visible. The conclusions are that neo-colonialism is active.","PeriodicalId":42199,"journal":{"name":"Insight on Africa","volume":"11 1","pages":"184 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0975087819845197","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight on Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087819845197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Africa is suffering from neo-colonialism for the same reasons that it suffered from colonialism. Neo-colonialism is the regressive impact of unregulated forms of aid, trade and foreign direct investment; and the collaboration of African leaders with foreign leaders to ensure that the interests of both are met with little concern for the development, sustainability and poverty reduction and wellbeing in African countries. The relationship is asymmetrical or at the cost of African states and their people, who are dependent rather that inter-dependent and do not profit through development or sustainability. They face destruction of their culture, religion and education through continued advancement of foreign culture, religion and language to supplant the African and growing radicalisation of the population. This is elaborated thematically under four headings: Africa the colonial dream, the emergence of neo-colonialism, the proponents of neo-colonialism and the element of religion. Evidence of Middle East states are shown as neo-colonialists in Africa discussed under the cases of Turkey and Iran. The motivation of the former is for the purposes of economics and the latter is for the purposes of religion. Both benefit also through status by projecting their influence as growing global actors. The breakdown of African nations rather than their positive construction and development is increasingly visible. The conclusions are that neo-colonialism is active.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲新殖民主义与土耳其和伊朗的个案
非洲正遭受新殖民主义的痛苦,其原因与遭受殖民主义的原因相同。新殖民主义是不受管制的援助、贸易和外国直接投资形式的倒退影响;以及非洲领导人与外国领导人的合作,以确保双方的利益得到满足,而不关心非洲国家的发展、可持续性、减贫和福祉。这种关系是不对称的,或者是以非洲国家及其人民为代价的,他们是相互依赖的,不通过发展或可持续性获利。由于外国文化、宗教和语言的不断发展以取代非洲人,以及人口日益激进化,他们面临着文化、宗教及教育的破坏。这在四个标题下进行了主题阐述:非洲——殖民梦想、新殖民主义的出现、新殖民论的支持者和宗教元素。中东国家的证据显示,它们是在土耳其和伊朗的案例下讨论的非洲新殖民主义者。前者的动机是出于经济目的,后者是出于宗教目的。这两个国家也因其作为日益增长的全球行动者的影响力而受益。非洲国家的崩溃越来越明显,而不是它们积极的建设和发展。结论是,新殖民主义是活跃的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insight on Africa
Insight on Africa AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: nsight on Africa is a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal covering contemporary African affairs and issues of policy relevance. It focuses on, though not confined to, foreign policies and developmental issues of African countries. The journal specially encourages article submission on issues related to emerging powers in Africa, BRICS in Africa and Afro-Asian relations. The journal is owned by African Studies Association of India (ASA India) located at Centre for African Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi and its publication is managed by Policy Research Institute of African Studies Association (PRIASA) based in New Delhi.
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the Link Between Bilateral Investment Treaties and Environmental Sustainability in Sub-Saharan African Countries Book review: Nathanael Ojong (Ed.), Off-Grid Solar Electrification in Africa: A Critical Perspective Ethio-Eritrean Relation: From Jubilant Liaison to Paroxysm Hostility Since 2018 Same Game, Different Participation in Nigeria: A qualitative study of (2006) National Gender Policy The Effect of Violent Extremism on Local Conflicts and Vice Versa: Differences and Similarities among Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1