Towards a greater global understanding of wellbeing: A proposal for a more inclusive measure

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Wellbeing Pub Date : 2020-05-31 DOI:10.5502/IJW.V10I2.1037
L. Lambert, T. Lomas, M. V. D. Weijer, Holli-Anne Passmore, Mohsen Joshanloo, James K. Harter, Y. Ishikawa, A. Lai, Takuya Kitagawa, Dominique Chen, Takafumi Kawakami, H. Miyata, E. Diener
{"title":"Towards a greater global understanding of wellbeing: A proposal for a more inclusive measure","authors":"L. Lambert, T. Lomas, M. V. D. Weijer, Holli-Anne Passmore, Mohsen Joshanloo, James K. Harter, Y. Ishikawa, A. Lai, Takuya Kitagawa, Dominique Chen, Takafumi Kawakami, H. Miyata, E. Diener","doi":"10.5502/IJW.V10I2.1037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The science of wellbeing has come a long way from the early days of measuring wellbeing via a nation’s GDP, and wellbeing measures and concepts continue to proliferate to capture its various elements. Yet, much of this activity has reflected concepts from Western cultures, despite the emphasis placed on wellbeing in all corners of the globe. To meet the challenges and opportunities arising from cross-disciplinary research worldwide, the Well-Being for Planet Earth Foundation and the Gallup World Poll have joined forces to add more culturally relevant constructs and questions to existing Gallup modules. In this white paper, we review the discussion from the international well-being summit in Kyoto, Japan (August 2019), where nine such additions were proposed and highlight why a more global view of wellbeing is needed. Overall, the new items reflect a richer view of wellbeing than life satisfaction alone and include hedonic and eudaimonic facets of wellbeing, social wellbeing, the role of culture, community, nature, and governance. These additions allow for the measurement of a broader conceptualization of wellbeing, more refined and nuanced cross-cultural comparisons, and facilitate a better examination of the causes of variation in global wellbeing. The new Gallup World Poll additions will be trialled in 2020, with additional inclusions from this summit to be made in 2021.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wellbeing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5502/IJW.V10I2.1037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

The science of wellbeing has come a long way from the early days of measuring wellbeing via a nation’s GDP, and wellbeing measures and concepts continue to proliferate to capture its various elements. Yet, much of this activity has reflected concepts from Western cultures, despite the emphasis placed on wellbeing in all corners of the globe. To meet the challenges and opportunities arising from cross-disciplinary research worldwide, the Well-Being for Planet Earth Foundation and the Gallup World Poll have joined forces to add more culturally relevant constructs and questions to existing Gallup modules. In this white paper, we review the discussion from the international well-being summit in Kyoto, Japan (August 2019), where nine such additions were proposed and highlight why a more global view of wellbeing is needed. Overall, the new items reflect a richer view of wellbeing than life satisfaction alone and include hedonic and eudaimonic facets of wellbeing, social wellbeing, the role of culture, community, nature, and governance. These additions allow for the measurement of a broader conceptualization of wellbeing, more refined and nuanced cross-cultural comparisons, and facilitate a better examination of the causes of variation in global wellbeing. The new Gallup World Poll additions will be trialled in 2020, with additional inclusions from this summit to be made in 2021.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增进全球对福祉的理解:一项更具包容性的措施建议
幸福感科学与早期通过一个国家的GDP来衡量幸福感相比已经取得了长足的进步,幸福感的衡量标准和概念不断涌现,以捕捉其各种要素。然而,尽管世界各地都强调幸福,但这项活动在很大程度上反映了西方文化的概念。为了应对全球跨学科研究带来的挑战和机遇,地球福祉基金会和盖洛普世界民意调查联合起来,在现有的盖洛普模块中添加了更多与文化相关的结构和问题。在这份白皮书中,我们回顾了2019年8月在日本京都举行的国际福祉峰会上的讨论,会上提出了九项这样的补充,并强调了为什么需要更全球化的福祉观。总的来说,这些新项目反映了比生活满意度更丰富的幸福观,包括幸福感、社会幸福感、文化作用、社区、自然和治理的享乐和享乐方面。这些补充允许对幸福感进行更广泛的概念化测量,进行更精细和细致入微的跨文化比较,并有助于更好地研究全球幸福感变化的原因。盖洛普世界民意调查的新增内容将于2020年进行试验,此次峰会的新增内容也将于2021年进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Wellbeing
International Journal of Wellbeing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A provisional global comparison framework: One hundred psychologically salient ways of conceptualizing and evaluating the world Beyond a single story: The heterogeneity of human flourishing in 22 countries The brief thriving scale: Assessing the ability to learn, grow, and find benefits in stressful events Well-being and ill-being on campus Brief computerised self-help interventions, the “Miracle Question,” and the moderating effects of openness-to-experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1