Challenges and gaps in regulating medical laboratories in India

Q2 Social Sciences Medical Law International Pub Date : 2023-08-26 DOI:10.1177/09685332231194199
Pallavi Gupta, S. Nandraj
{"title":"Challenges and gaps in regulating medical laboratories in India","authors":"Pallavi Gupta, S. Nandraj","doi":"10.1177/09685332231194199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate diagnosis is an essential component of healthcare delivery. However, research on the delivery of diagnostic services is lacking in low- and middle-income countries. This article examines the issues related to the provision of medical laboratory services in India, including licencing, geographic distribution, charging practices, quality, personnel requirements, information sharing, and newer technologies that impact the sector. The challenges and gaps in regulatory mechanisms governing these services are discussed, highlighting the need for improvements. Legislation to regulate medical laboratories in many Indian states is either outdated or non-existent, with some states recently updating or enacting their laws. A registry of medical laboratories in the country will assist in assessing and meeting the shortfall. Universal adoption of external and inter-laboratory quality control mechanisms will help in standardization and ensuring quality. Clarity and consensus on who can operate medical laboratories and the responsibility of different cadres of technical staff are required. The provision for making information on registered laboratories publicly available under the Central and some state legislations can be very useful to the users in choosing laboratories. Mandatory reporting to the government by both public- and private-sector laboratories will help in maintaining data on disease burden and in planning health services. However, the lack of data protection laws in the country creates the potential for violation of the users’ privacy when laboratories store data digitally and report it online on government web portals. Caution is warranted in the use of newer technologies until the regulations governing these matters are strengthened. A combination of voluntary and statutory mechanisms such as accreditation and regulation would be useful instruments for ensuring quality in diagnostic services. Research on the effectiveness of existing provisions at the state level would help in understanding their impact and suggest ways of further improvement.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231194199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis is an essential component of healthcare delivery. However, research on the delivery of diagnostic services is lacking in low- and middle-income countries. This article examines the issues related to the provision of medical laboratory services in India, including licencing, geographic distribution, charging practices, quality, personnel requirements, information sharing, and newer technologies that impact the sector. The challenges and gaps in regulatory mechanisms governing these services are discussed, highlighting the need for improvements. Legislation to regulate medical laboratories in many Indian states is either outdated or non-existent, with some states recently updating or enacting their laws. A registry of medical laboratories in the country will assist in assessing and meeting the shortfall. Universal adoption of external and inter-laboratory quality control mechanisms will help in standardization and ensuring quality. Clarity and consensus on who can operate medical laboratories and the responsibility of different cadres of technical staff are required. The provision for making information on registered laboratories publicly available under the Central and some state legislations can be very useful to the users in choosing laboratories. Mandatory reporting to the government by both public- and private-sector laboratories will help in maintaining data on disease burden and in planning health services. However, the lack of data protection laws in the country creates the potential for violation of the users’ privacy when laboratories store data digitally and report it online on government web portals. Caution is warranted in the use of newer technologies until the regulations governing these matters are strengthened. A combination of voluntary and statutory mechanisms such as accreditation and regulation would be useful instruments for ensuring quality in diagnostic services. Research on the effectiveness of existing provisions at the state level would help in understanding their impact and suggest ways of further improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度医学实验室监管面临的挑战和差距
准确的诊断是提供医疗服务的重要组成部分。然而,中低收入国家缺乏关于提供诊断服务的研究。本文探讨了印度提供医学实验室服务的相关问题,包括许可证发放、地理分布、收费做法、质量、人员要求、信息共享以及影响该行业的新技术。讨论了管理这些服务的监管机制中的挑战和差距,强调了改进的必要性。印度许多州监管医学实验室的立法要么已经过时,要么根本不存在,一些州最近更新或颁布了法律。该国的医学实验室登记册将有助于评估和弥补短缺。普遍采用外部和实验室间的质量控制机制将有助于标准化和确保质量。对于谁可以操作医学实验室以及不同技术人员干部的责任,需要明确并达成共识。根据中央和一些州的立法,公开注册实验室的信息对用户选择实验室非常有用。公共和私营部门实验室都必须向政府报告,这将有助于维护疾病负担数据和规划卫生服务。然而,由于该国缺乏数据保护法,当实验室以数字方式存储数据并在政府门户网站上在线报告数据时,可能会侵犯用户隐私。在管理这些问题的法规得到加强之前,在使用新技术时必须谨慎。将认可和监管等自愿和法定机制结合起来,将是确保诊断服务质量的有用工具。在州一级研究现有条款的有效性将有助于了解其影响,并提出进一步改进的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law International
Medical Law International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.
期刊最新文献
Challenges for the legislation enabling egg donation in Switzerland. Book review: Not What the Bus Promised: Health Governance After Brexit Accessing third-party research databases for criminal investigations: Enhancing legal protections and safeguarding public interests Book review: The Disability Bioethics Reader Book review: The Right to Be Protected From Committing Suicide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1