{"title":"Miraculous, mutilated, mundane: Redrawing children’s art in Francoist Spain","authors":"A. Kendrick","doi":"10.1177/20436106211023510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children’s drawings hold a contested place in archives of war. Often portrayed as unfiltered records of psychological impact on innocent young civilians, the same drawings are also sophisticated testimonies of agency. With child-artists creating their work within classrooms, families, and communities, this article offers an alternative reading of their historical significance. Children’s art offers not simply a firsthand view of conflict but also a critical view onto the alliances and ideologies of the adults who guided their creation. Before and after the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), after which Spain entered into several decades of National-Catholic dictatorship, psychologists and teachers used children’s drawings to further educational projects toward both progressive and conservative ends. Across key nodes of conflict and postwar quietude, I ask how advocacy of children’s art allowed teachers to practice what I call a form of pedagogical postmemory. Centering on Francoist-era education and the artists who created new openings for individual expression, the essay focuses on two educators, namely the artist Ángel Ferrant (1890–1961) and the novelist Josefina Aldecoa (1926–2011). Contrasting their paired views of children’s art as a liberating, imaginative activity with that of the Francoist pedagogue Josefina Álvarez de Cánovas (1898–?), this study exposes how the same fundamental rhetoric of imagination and freedom could result in vastly different archives of children’s drawings under dictatorship. Understanding children’s art as bound up in wider social and political processes, it posits the seemingly neutral sphere of postwar art education as a key vehicle for pedagogical memory and historical recovery.","PeriodicalId":37143,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies of Childhood","volume":"11 1","pages":"142 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20436106211023510","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies of Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106211023510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Children’s drawings hold a contested place in archives of war. Often portrayed as unfiltered records of psychological impact on innocent young civilians, the same drawings are also sophisticated testimonies of agency. With child-artists creating their work within classrooms, families, and communities, this article offers an alternative reading of their historical significance. Children’s art offers not simply a firsthand view of conflict but also a critical view onto the alliances and ideologies of the adults who guided their creation. Before and after the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), after which Spain entered into several decades of National-Catholic dictatorship, psychologists and teachers used children’s drawings to further educational projects toward both progressive and conservative ends. Across key nodes of conflict and postwar quietude, I ask how advocacy of children’s art allowed teachers to practice what I call a form of pedagogical postmemory. Centering on Francoist-era education and the artists who created new openings for individual expression, the essay focuses on two educators, namely the artist Ángel Ferrant (1890–1961) and the novelist Josefina Aldecoa (1926–2011). Contrasting their paired views of children’s art as a liberating, imaginative activity with that of the Francoist pedagogue Josefina Álvarez de Cánovas (1898–?), this study exposes how the same fundamental rhetoric of imagination and freedom could result in vastly different archives of children’s drawings under dictatorship. Understanding children’s art as bound up in wider social and political processes, it posits the seemingly neutral sphere of postwar art education as a key vehicle for pedagogical memory and historical recovery.
儿童绘画在战争档案中占有有争议的地位。这些画通常被描绘成未经过滤的对无辜年轻平民心理影响的记录,也是机构的复杂证词。随着儿童艺术家在课堂、家庭和社区中创作他们的作品,这篇文章为他们的历史意义提供了另一种解读。儿童艺术不仅提供了对冲突的第一手看法,还提供了对指导他们创作的成年人的联盟和意识形态的批判性看法。在西班牙内战(1936–1939)前后,西班牙进入了几十年的国家天主教独裁统治,心理学家和教师利用儿童绘画来推动教育项目,达到进步和保守的目的。在冲突和战后平静的关键节点上,我问对儿童艺术的倡导是如何让教师实践我所说的一种教学后记忆形式的。本文以法语时代的教育和为个人表达创造新机会的艺术家为中心,重点关注两位教育工作者,即艺术家安吉尔·费兰特(1890–1961)和小说家Josefina Aldecoa(1926–2011)。将他们将儿童艺术视为一种解放、富有想象力的活动的观点与法语教育家JosefinaÁlvarez de Cánovas(1898–?)的观点进行对比,这项研究揭示了在独裁统治下,同样的想象力和自由的基本修辞如何会导致截然不同的儿童绘画档案。它将儿童艺术与更广泛的社会和政治进程联系在一起,将战后艺术教育的看似中立的领域视为教学记忆和历史恢复的关键载体。