Empirical Data Assimilation for Merging Total Electron Content Data with Empirical and Physical Models

IF 4.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Surveys in Geophysics Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.1007/s10712-023-09788-7
Ehsan Forootan, Mona Kosary, Saeed Farzaneh, Maike Schumacher
{"title":"Empirical Data Assimilation for Merging Total Electron Content Data with Empirical and Physical Models","authors":"Ehsan Forootan,&nbsp;Mona Kosary,&nbsp;Saeed Farzaneh,&nbsp;Maike Schumacher","doi":"10.1007/s10712-023-09788-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An accurate estimation of ionospheric variables such as the total electron content (TEC) is important for many space weather, communication, and satellite geodetic applications. Empirical and physics-based models are often used to determine TEC in these applications. However, it is known that these models cannot reproduce all ionospheric variability due to various reasons such as their simplified model structure, coarse sampling of their inputs, and dependencies to the calibration period. Bayesian-based data assimilation (DA) techniques are often used for improving these model’s performance, but their computational cost is considerably large. In this study, first, we review the available DA techniques for upper atmosphere data assimilation. Then, we will present an empirical decomposition-based data assimilation (DDA), based on the principal component analysis and the ensemble Kalman filter. DDA considerably reduces the computational complexity of previous DA implementations. Its performance is demonstrated by updating the empirical orthogonal functions of the empirical NeQuick and the physics-based TIEGCM models using the rapid global ionosphere map (GIM) TEC products as observation. The new models, respectively, called ‘DDA-NeQuick’ and ‘DDA-TIEGCM,’ are then used to predict TEC values for the next day. Comparisons of the TEC forecasts with the final GIM TEC products (that are available after 11 days) represent an average <span>\\(42.46\\%\\)</span> and <span>\\(31.89\\%\\)</span> root mean squared error (RMSE) reduction during our test period, September 2017.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49458,"journal":{"name":"Surveys in Geophysics","volume":"44 6","pages":"2011 - 2041"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys in Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10712-023-09788-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An accurate estimation of ionospheric variables such as the total electron content (TEC) is important for many space weather, communication, and satellite geodetic applications. Empirical and physics-based models are often used to determine TEC in these applications. However, it is known that these models cannot reproduce all ionospheric variability due to various reasons such as their simplified model structure, coarse sampling of their inputs, and dependencies to the calibration period. Bayesian-based data assimilation (DA) techniques are often used for improving these model’s performance, but their computational cost is considerably large. In this study, first, we review the available DA techniques for upper atmosphere data assimilation. Then, we will present an empirical decomposition-based data assimilation (DDA), based on the principal component analysis and the ensemble Kalman filter. DDA considerably reduces the computational complexity of previous DA implementations. Its performance is demonstrated by updating the empirical orthogonal functions of the empirical NeQuick and the physics-based TIEGCM models using the rapid global ionosphere map (GIM) TEC products as observation. The new models, respectively, called ‘DDA-NeQuick’ and ‘DDA-TIEGCM,’ are then used to predict TEC values for the next day. Comparisons of the TEC forecasts with the final GIM TEC products (that are available after 11 days) represent an average \(42.46\%\) and \(31.89\%\) root mean squared error (RMSE) reduction during our test period, September 2017.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将总电子含量数据与经验模型和物理模型合并的经验数据同化
准确估计电离层变量,如总电子含量(TEC)对许多空间天气、通信和卫星大地测量应用都很重要。在这些应用中,通常使用经验和基于物理的模型来确定TEC。然而,众所周知,由于模型结构简化、输入采样粗糙以及依赖于校准周期等原因,这些模型无法再现所有电离层变率。基于贝叶斯的数据同化(DA)技术通常用于提高这些模型的性能,但其计算成本相当大。本文首先综述了目前用于高层大气资料同化的数据同化技术。然后,我们将提出一种基于主成分分析和集合卡尔曼滤波的经验分解数据同化(DDA)方法。DDA大大降低了以前的数据处理实现的计算复杂度。利用快速全球电离层图(GIM) TEC产品作为观测,对经验NeQuick模型和基于物理的TIEGCM模型的经验正交函数进行了更新,验证了其性能。新的模型,分别称为“DDA-NeQuick”和“DDA-TIEGCM”,然后用于预测第二天的TEC值。TEC预测与最终GIM TEC产品(11天后可用)的比较表明,在我们的测试期间(2017年9月),平均\(42.46\%\)和\(31.89\%\)均方根误差(RMSE)降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surveys in Geophysics
Surveys in Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
10.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Surveys in Geophysics publishes refereed review articles on the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring within the Earth, on its surface, in its atmosphere and in the near-Earth space environment, including relations with other bodies in the solar system. Observations, their interpretation, theory and modelling are covered in papers dealing with any of the Earth and space sciences.
期刊最新文献
Meta Learning for Improved Neural Network Wavefield Solutions An Overview of Theoretical Studies of Non-Seismic Phenomena Accompanying Earthquakes Identification and Verification of Geodynamic Risk Zones in the Western Carpathians Using Remote Sensing, Geophysical and GNSS Data Efficient Solutions for Forward Modeling of the Earth's Topographic Potential in Spheroidal Harmonics Special Issue on Earth’s Changing Water and Energy Cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1