Automotive Industrialisation: Industrial Policy and Development in Southeast Asia by Kaoru Natsuda and John Thoburn (review)

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Southeast Asian Economies Pub Date : 2020-10-14 DOI:10.4324/9780429445354
T. S. Yean
{"title":"Automotive Industrialisation: Industrial Policy and Development in Southeast Asia by Kaoru Natsuda and John Thoburn (review)","authors":"T. S. Yean","doi":"10.4324/9780429445354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"neighbouring countries. Third, leaders across Asia were often quite decisive, introducing large (sometimes drastic) reforms when needed. Supporting all of this, in many countries, governments set out a shared vision of development for the future. These visions, many of which were labelled “plans”, were really broad outlines of the development strategy to be followed rather than serious attempts at formal economic planning. Nevertheless, the broad national visions helped underpin growth, especially when backed by a competent bureaucracy and other strong institutions. Another overarching theme which runs through the study is that the idea that there has been any “Asian consensus” about development policies which is different from the so-called “Washington consensus” is wrong. Rather, it was the pragmatic approach to policy—reinforced by pro-market programmes, state support and workable institutions—that contributed to success in Asia. The summary in Chapter 1 explains how these processes reinforced each other: “Markets, prices and competition are critical for the efficient allocation of resources and the creation of entrepreneurial incentives. The state is needed to establish strong institutions, intervene where markets fail to work efficiently and promote social equity. Strong institutions ensure orderly functioning of markets and accountability of the state”. It is true, as Western academic and media critics of Asian governments frequently point out, that these policies have often been adopted in a patchy way. There are still significant distortions in pricing and competition policies in many developing countries in Asia. Implementation of policies is often weak because of state failure. And greater attention to social equity is needed in many countries. Yet, overall, the improvements in these areas across developing Asia in the last fifty years has been remarkable. There is a long way to go. Developing Asia has made a good start. Hopefully, there will be many more improvements in the five decades to come. In the meantime, this book is the best and most up to day survey of the factors underpinning the success of development in Asia in the last half-century.","PeriodicalId":43712,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Economies","volume":"38 1","pages":"156 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429445354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

neighbouring countries. Third, leaders across Asia were often quite decisive, introducing large (sometimes drastic) reforms when needed. Supporting all of this, in many countries, governments set out a shared vision of development for the future. These visions, many of which were labelled “plans”, were really broad outlines of the development strategy to be followed rather than serious attempts at formal economic planning. Nevertheless, the broad national visions helped underpin growth, especially when backed by a competent bureaucracy and other strong institutions. Another overarching theme which runs through the study is that the idea that there has been any “Asian consensus” about development policies which is different from the so-called “Washington consensus” is wrong. Rather, it was the pragmatic approach to policy—reinforced by pro-market programmes, state support and workable institutions—that contributed to success in Asia. The summary in Chapter 1 explains how these processes reinforced each other: “Markets, prices and competition are critical for the efficient allocation of resources and the creation of entrepreneurial incentives. The state is needed to establish strong institutions, intervene where markets fail to work efficiently and promote social equity. Strong institutions ensure orderly functioning of markets and accountability of the state”. It is true, as Western academic and media critics of Asian governments frequently point out, that these policies have often been adopted in a patchy way. There are still significant distortions in pricing and competition policies in many developing countries in Asia. Implementation of policies is often weak because of state failure. And greater attention to social equity is needed in many countries. Yet, overall, the improvements in these areas across developing Asia in the last fifty years has been remarkable. There is a long way to go. Developing Asia has made a good start. Hopefully, there will be many more improvements in the five decades to come. In the meantime, this book is the best and most up to day survey of the factors underpinning the success of development in Asia in the last half-century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kaoru Natsuda和John Thoburn的《汽车工业化:东南亚的产业政策与发展》(综述)
邻国。第三,亚洲各国领导人往往非常果断,在需要时进行大规模(有时是激烈的)改革。为了支持这一切,许多国家的政府制定了对未来发展的共同愿景。这些愿景,其中许多被称为“计划”,实际上是要遵循的发展战略的大致轮廓,而不是正式经济规划的认真尝试。尽管如此,广泛的国家愿景有助于支撑经济增长,尤其是在有能力的官僚机构和其他强大机构支持的情况下。贯穿该研究的另一个总体主题是,认为在发展政策方面存在任何不同于所谓“华盛顿共识”的“亚洲共识”的想法是错误的。相反,正是务实的政策方法——通过亲市场的计划、国家支持和可行的机构来加强——促成了亚洲的成功。第1章中的总结说明了这些过程是如何相互加强的:“市场、价格和竞争对于资源的有效分配和创业激励的产生至关重要。国家需要建立强有力的机构,在市场无法有效运作的地方进行干预,并促进社会公平。强有力的机构确保市场的有序运作和国家的问责制”。的确,正如西方学术界和媒体对亚洲政府的批评人士经常指出的那样,这些政策的实施方式往往参差不齐。亚洲许多发展中国家的定价和竞争政策仍然存在严重扭曲。由于状态故障,策略的执行往往很弱。许多国家需要更加重视社会公平。然而,总的来说,在过去五十年中,亚洲发展中国家在这些领域的进步是显著的。还有很长的路要走。发展中的亚洲已经有了一个良好的开端。希望在未来的五十年里会有更多的改进。与此同时,这本书是对过去半个世纪亚洲发展成功的因素进行的最好、最新的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE) is a peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary journal focusing on economic issues in Southeast Asia. JSEAE features articles based on original research, research notes, policy notes, review articles and book reviews, and welcomes submissions of conceptual, theoretical and empirical articles preferably with substantive policy discussions. Original research articles and research notes can be country studies or cross-country comparative studies. For quantitative-oriented articles, authors should strive to ensure that their work is accessible to non-specialists. Submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous peer-review process – two reviewers for original research articles and one reviewer for research notes and policy notes. The journal is published three times a year: April, August and December.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the Impact of Selected Macroeconomic Indicators on Remittance Inflows in the Philippines Avoiding the Resource Curse: Lessons from Indonesia The Vulnerability of Jobs to Mobility Restrictions: Malaysia's Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic How Far Has India Integrated with East Asian Economies? Evidence from International Trade Data Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Labour Market in Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1