Evaluating the Impact of [BlindedMethodName] on Learning Analytics Knowledge Creation and Acceptance during Multidisciplinary, Co-Design of Learning Activities

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Interaction Design and Architectures Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.55612/s-5002-055-001
Marcel Schmitz, Maren Scheffel, Roger Bemelmans, H. Drachsler
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of [BlindedMethodName] on Learning Analytics Knowledge Creation and Acceptance during Multidisciplinary, Co-Design of Learning Activities","authors":"Marcel Schmitz, Maren Scheffel, Roger Bemelmans, H. Drachsler","doi":"10.55612/s-5002-055-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning analytics offers opportunities to enhance the design of learning activities by providing information on the impact of different learning designs. Despite the availability of design methods that aim to facilitate the integration of learning analytics in learning design, there is a lack of research evaluating their effectiveness. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the FoLA2 method. Sixty participants utilized the FoLA2 method to create fourteen learning activities in higher education settings. To measure the impact, participants completed a technology acceptance test both before and after each session. Additionally, the researchers analyzed audio recordings of the sessions using epistemic network analysis to gain insights into the discussions surrounding learning analytics and the design of enriched learning activities. The results of both the technology acceptance test and the epistemic network analysis indicated that the FoLA2 method effectively supports the integration of learning analytics during the design of learning activities.","PeriodicalId":44247,"journal":{"name":"Interaction Design and Architectures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interaction Design and Architectures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-055-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning analytics offers opportunities to enhance the design of learning activities by providing information on the impact of different learning designs. Despite the availability of design methods that aim to facilitate the integration of learning analytics in learning design, there is a lack of research evaluating their effectiveness. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the FoLA2 method. Sixty participants utilized the FoLA2 method to create fourteen learning activities in higher education settings. To measure the impact, participants completed a technology acceptance test both before and after each session. Additionally, the researchers analyzed audio recordings of the sessions using epistemic network analysis to gain insights into the discussions surrounding learning analytics and the design of enriched learning activities. The results of both the technology acceptance test and the epistemic network analysis indicated that the FoLA2 method effectively supports the integration of learning analytics during the design of learning activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估[盲法名称]对学习分析的影响在多学科、共同设计学习活动中知识的创造和接受
学习分析通过提供不同学习设计的影响信息,提供了加强学习活动设计的机会。尽管设计方法旨在促进学习分析在学习设计中的集成,但缺乏评估其有效性的研究。本研究旨在评估FoLA2方法的有效性。60名参与者使用FoLA2方法在高等教育环境中创建了14项学习活动。为了衡量影响,参与者在每次会议前后都完成了技术验收测试。此外,研究人员使用认知网络分析分析了会议的录音,以深入了解围绕学习分析和丰富学习活动设计的讨论。技术接受测试和认知网络分析的结果表明,FoLA2方法有效地支持了学习活动设计过程中学习分析的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interaction Design and Architectures
Interaction Design and Architectures EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: IxD&A (Interaction Design and Architecture (s)) Journal bases its existence on the following beliefs: - the complexity of today''s society requires the developments of new visions and new tools to address new systemic problems; - one needs at large to promote a deeper understanding of the interaction mechanisms, whatever the scale and the phenomena involved, from which originate the dynamic and static of the systems and all forms of architectures; - within complex systems, processes, architectures and cultural stratifications the focus should be always the individuals and their continuous co-evolution with the place that they populate; - the project and the ability to meta-design are central elements necessary to live consciously experiences, and above all those mediated by the machine. IxD&A aims to offer an interdisciplinary arena where everybody can present top level researches and discuss ideas on the future of technology mediated experiences in the field of communication, learning, working, entertainment, healthcare, etc...) a future that can be made possible by a joint effort in research and education. IxD&A, indeed, offers the ideal forum for meeting among frontier research, education, cutting edge technology development and application. Indeed, there will be no future if research and education will not be able to meet the world of production, or, in other words if we will not be able to transfer the ''lab'' into real life.
期刊最新文献
Participatory Design and Critical Media Studies: a Convivial Conversation Building an augmented reality system for consumption and production of hybrid gaming and storytelling Usability Heuristics for Applications in the Context of Resilient Cities Hybrid Games and Interaction Design Gamification of design studio in the context of a user-centered design workshop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1