Protecting livelihoods in the COVID-19 crisis: A comparative analysis of European labour market and social policies

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Global Social Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-06 DOI:10.1177/14680181211019281
A. Seemann, U. Becker, Linxin He, Eva Maria Hohnerlein, N. Wilman
{"title":"Protecting livelihoods in the COVID-19 crisis: A comparative analysis of European labour market and social policies","authors":"A. Seemann, U. Becker, Linxin He, Eva Maria Hohnerlein, N. Wilman","doi":"10.1177/14680181211019281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a comparative study of the labour market and social policy measures introduced in light of the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom between March 2020 and January 2021. Its main aim is to understand whether the crisis response has changed the structures of the welfare states concerned. Focusing in particular on the differences regarding the crisis measures taken for individuals in ‘standard employment’ and ‘non-standard workers’ in each country, it argues that, although extensive temporary protection instruments were introduced for both groups during the crisis, these did not lead to an immediate convergence as regards these groups’ social protection. Rather than changing the underlying structures of welfare systems, many of the measures in fact highlighted the specific vulnerabilities of large segments of Europe’s labour markets. States have, however, granted social compensation at unprecedented levels, which could result in improved infrastructures and a clearer understanding of the responsibility of the welfare state in future emergencies.","PeriodicalId":46041,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Policy","volume":"21 1","pages":"550 - 568"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14680181211019281","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211019281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article provides a comparative study of the labour market and social policy measures introduced in light of the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom between March 2020 and January 2021. Its main aim is to understand whether the crisis response has changed the structures of the welfare states concerned. Focusing in particular on the differences regarding the crisis measures taken for individuals in ‘standard employment’ and ‘non-standard workers’ in each country, it argues that, although extensive temporary protection instruments were introduced for both groups during the crisis, these did not lead to an immediate convergence as regards these groups’ social protection. Rather than changing the underlying structures of welfare systems, many of the measures in fact highlighted the specific vulnerabilities of large segments of Europe’s labour markets. States have, however, granted social compensation at unprecedented levels, which could result in improved infrastructures and a clearer understanding of the responsibility of the welfare state in future emergencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎危机中的生计保护:欧洲劳动力市场和社会政策的比较分析
本文对2020年3月至2021年1月期间丹麦、法国、德国、意大利和英国针对新冠肺炎危机采取的劳动力市场和社会政策措施进行了比较研究。其主要目的是了解危机应对是否改变了相关福利国家的结构。它特别关注各国对“标准就业”和“非标准工人”个人采取的危机措施的差异,认为尽管在危机期间为这两个群体引入了广泛的临时保护文书,但这些文书并没有导致这些群体的社会保护立即趋同。事实上,许多措施并没有改变福利制度的基本结构,而是突出了欧洲劳动力市场大部分的具体脆弱性。然而,各国提供了前所未有的社会补偿,这可能会改善基础设施,并更清楚地了解福利国家在未来紧急情况下的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Social Policy
Global Social Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Global Social Policy is a fully peer-reviewed journal that advances the understanding of the impact of globalisation processes upon social policy and social development on the one hand, and the impact of social policy upon globalisation processes on the other hand. The journal analyses the contributions of a range of national and international actors, both governmental and non-governmental, to global social policy and social development discourse and practice. Global Social Policy publishes scholarly policy-oriented articles and reports that focus on aspects of social policy and social and human development as broadly defined in the context of globalisation be it in contemporary or historical contexts.
期刊最新文献
Social sustainability in the decarbonized welfare state: Social policy as a buffer against poverty related to environmental taxes When growth is not enough: Do government transfers moderate the effect of economic growth on absolute and relative child poverty? Social policy as knowledge process: How its sociotechnical links to labour reconfigure the social question An eco-social policy typology: From system reproduction to transformation Reflexivity in global social policy: Introduction to the special issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1