Using choice modelling to identify popular and affordable alternative interventions for schistosomiasis in Uganda

IF 2.2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Environment and Development Economics Pub Date : 2022-05-10 DOI:10.1017/S1355770X22000079
Keila Meginnis, N. Hanley, Lazaaro Mujumbusi, L. Pickering, P. Lamberton
{"title":"Using choice modelling to identify popular and affordable alternative interventions for schistosomiasis in Uganda","authors":"Keila Meginnis, N. Hanley, Lazaaro Mujumbusi, L. Pickering, P. Lamberton","doi":"10.1017/S1355770X22000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Schistosomiasis is caused by a vector-borne parasite, commonly found in low- and middle-income countries. People become infected by direct contact with contaminated water through activities such as collecting water, bathing and fishing. Water becomes contaminated when human waste is not adequately contained. We administered a discrete choice experiment to understand community preferences for interventions that would reduce individuals' risk of contracting, or transmitting, Schistosoma mansoni. These focused on water access, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions. We compared interventions that target behaviours that mainly put oneself at higher risk versus behaviours that mainly put others at risk. We used two payment vehicles to quantify what individuals are willing to give up in time and/or labour for interventions to be implemented. Key findings indicate that new sources of potable water and fines on open defecation are the highest valued interventions.","PeriodicalId":47751,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Development Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":"578 - 600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X22000079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Schistosomiasis is caused by a vector-borne parasite, commonly found in low- and middle-income countries. People become infected by direct contact with contaminated water through activities such as collecting water, bathing and fishing. Water becomes contaminated when human waste is not adequately contained. We administered a discrete choice experiment to understand community preferences for interventions that would reduce individuals' risk of contracting, or transmitting, Schistosoma mansoni. These focused on water access, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions. We compared interventions that target behaviours that mainly put oneself at higher risk versus behaviours that mainly put others at risk. We used two payment vehicles to quantify what individuals are willing to give up in time and/or labour for interventions to be implemented. Key findings indicate that new sources of potable water and fines on open defecation are the highest valued interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用选择模型确定乌干达流行且负担得起的血吸虫病替代干预措施
摘要血吸虫病是由媒介传播的寄生虫引起的,常见于中低收入国家。人们通过收集水、洗澡和钓鱼等活动直接接触受污染的水而感染。当人类排泄物得不到充分控制时,水就会受到污染。我们进行了一项离散选择实验,以了解社区对干预措施的偏好,从而降低个人感染或传播曼氏血吸虫病的风险。这些措施的重点是供水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施。我们比较了针对主要使自己面临更高风险的行为和主要使他人面临风险的行为的干预措施。我们使用了两种支付工具来量化个人愿意在时间和/或劳动力上放弃什么来实施干预措施。主要研究结果表明,新的饮用水来源和露天排便罚款是最有价值的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Environment and Development Economics is positioned at the intersection of environmental, resource and development economics. The Editor and Associate Editors, supported by a distinguished panel of advisors from around the world, aim to encourage submissions from researchers in the field in both developed and developing countries. The Journal is divided into two main sections, Theory and Applications, which includes regular academic papers and Policy Options, which includes papers that may be of interest to the wider policy community. Environment and Development Economics also publishes occasional Policy Fora (discussions based on a focal paper). From time to time the journal publishes special issues based on a particular theme.
期刊最新文献
A New Approach to Modeling the Cure Rate in the Presence of Interval Censored Data. Trade liberalization and the choice of pollution abatement Institutions' quality and environmental pollution in Africa With or without the European Union: the convention for the protection of the Black Sea against pollution Cross-ownership and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility under price competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1