Shorebirds ingest plastics too: What we know, what we don’t know, and what we should do next

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Reviews Pub Date : 2022-05-10 DOI:10.1139/er-2022-0008
S. Flemming, R. Lanctot, C. Price, M. Mallory, S. Kühn, M. Drever, T. Barry, J. Provencher
{"title":"Shorebirds ingest plastics too: What we know, what we don’t know, and what we should do next","authors":"S. Flemming, R. Lanctot, C. Price, M. Mallory, S. Kühn, M. Drever, T. Barry, J. Provencher","doi":"10.1139/er-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns about the impact of plastics pollution on the environment have been growing since the 1970s. Marine debris has reportedly entangled and/or been ingested by 914 marine species ranging from microinvertebrates to large marine mammals. Shorebirds could have a high potential to be exposed to and ingest plastics pollution, as many species migrate long distances and periodically concentrate around shorelines, coastal areas, and estuaries that can have elevated levels of plastics pollution. Currently, little is understood about plastics exposure, frequency of occurrence, and potential impacts relating to shorebirds. In this study, we catalogued and reviewed available studies across the globe that examined plastics pollution in shorebirds. We then quantified relevant traits of species and their environments to explore how shorebirds may be exposed to plastics pollution. Of 1106 samples from 26 shorebird species described within 16 studies that examined plastics ingestion, 53% of individuals contained some form of plastics pollution. Overall, Haematopodidae (oystercatchers) had the highest frequency of occurrence (FO) of plastics, followed by Recurvirostridae (avocets), Scolopacidae (sandpipers, phalaropes, godwits, curlews), and Charadriidae (plovers). Plastics FO was much greater among species that migrated across marine areas (either oceanic or coastal) than those species that used continental flyways. Species that foraged at sea, on mudflats, or on beaches, had higher average FO of plastics ingestion than species than foraged in upland, or freshwater environments. Finally, species that used a sweeping foraging mode showed higher levels of ingested plastics and contained a far greater number of plastic pieces than all other techniques. These conclusions are based on a limited number of species and samples, with the distribution of samples skewed taxonomically and geographically. Using the combined knowledge of known shorebirds-plastics interactions and shorebird ecology, we present a hierarchical approach to identifying shorebirds that may be more vulnerable and susceptible to plastics ingestion. We provide recommendations on sampling protocols and future areas of research.","PeriodicalId":50514,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2022-0008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Concerns about the impact of plastics pollution on the environment have been growing since the 1970s. Marine debris has reportedly entangled and/or been ingested by 914 marine species ranging from microinvertebrates to large marine mammals. Shorebirds could have a high potential to be exposed to and ingest plastics pollution, as many species migrate long distances and periodically concentrate around shorelines, coastal areas, and estuaries that can have elevated levels of plastics pollution. Currently, little is understood about plastics exposure, frequency of occurrence, and potential impacts relating to shorebirds. In this study, we catalogued and reviewed available studies across the globe that examined plastics pollution in shorebirds. We then quantified relevant traits of species and their environments to explore how shorebirds may be exposed to plastics pollution. Of 1106 samples from 26 shorebird species described within 16 studies that examined plastics ingestion, 53% of individuals contained some form of plastics pollution. Overall, Haematopodidae (oystercatchers) had the highest frequency of occurrence (FO) of plastics, followed by Recurvirostridae (avocets), Scolopacidae (sandpipers, phalaropes, godwits, curlews), and Charadriidae (plovers). Plastics FO was much greater among species that migrated across marine areas (either oceanic or coastal) than those species that used continental flyways. Species that foraged at sea, on mudflats, or on beaches, had higher average FO of plastics ingestion than species than foraged in upland, or freshwater environments. Finally, species that used a sweeping foraging mode showed higher levels of ingested plastics and contained a far greater number of plastic pieces than all other techniques. These conclusions are based on a limited number of species and samples, with the distribution of samples skewed taxonomically and geographically. Using the combined knowledge of known shorebirds-plastics interactions and shorebird ecology, we present a hierarchical approach to identifying shorebirds that may be more vulnerable and susceptible to plastics ingestion. We provide recommendations on sampling protocols and future areas of research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海鸟也会摄入塑料:我们知道什么,不知道什么,以及我们下一步应该做什么
自20世纪70年代以来,人们越来越担心塑料污染对环境的影响。据报道,从微型脊椎动物到大型海洋哺乳动物,914种海洋物种纠缠和/或摄入了海洋碎片。海岸鸟很有可能暴露在塑料污染中并摄入塑料污染,因为许多物种会长途迁徙,并周期性地集中在塑料污染水平较高的海岸线、沿海地区和河口。目前,人们对塑料暴露、发生频率以及与滨鸟有关的潜在影响知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们对全球范围内检查滨鸟塑料污染的现有研究进行了编目和审查。然后,我们量化了物种及其环境的相关特征,以探索滨鸟如何暴露在塑料污染中。在16项检查塑料摄入的研究中,来自26种滨鸟的1106个样本中,53%的个体含有某种形式的塑料污染。总的来说,Haematopodidae(捕鸟人)的塑料发生频率(FO)最高,其次是Recurvirostridae(avocets)、Scolopacidae(鹬、蝴蝶鱼、神智、杓鹬)和Charadridae(plovers)。在跨海洋(海洋或沿海)迁徙的物种中,塑料FO比使用大陆航道的物种大得多。与在高地或淡水环境中觅食的物种相比,在海上、泥滩或海滩上觅食的物种平均摄入塑料的FO更高。最后,与所有其他技术相比,使用全面觅食模式的物种摄入的塑料含量更高,塑料碎片数量也多得多。这些结论是基于数量有限的物种和样本,样本的分布在分类学和地理上存在偏差。利用已知滨鸟与塑料相互作用和滨鸟生态学的综合知识,我们提出了一种分层方法来识别可能更容易摄入塑料的滨鸟。我们提供有关采样方案和未来研究领域的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Reviews
Environmental Reviews 环境科学-环境科学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Published since 1993, Environmental Reviews is a quarterly journal that presents authoritative literature reviews on a wide range of environmental science and associated environmental studies topics, with emphasis on the effects on and response of both natural and manmade ecosystems to anthropogenic stress. The authorship and scope are international, with critical literature reviews submitted and invited on such topics as sustainability, water supply management, climate change, harvesting impacts, acid rain, pesticide use, lake acidification, air and marine pollution, oil and gas development, biological control, food chain biomagnification, rehabilitation of polluted aquatic systems, erosion, forestry, bio-indicators of environmental stress, conservation of biodiversity, and many other environmental issues.
期刊最新文献
A review of the assessment techniques used for population monitoring at different life stages of sturgeons Review of climate change and drinking water supply systems: employee perspectives and potential tools for adaptation The Acadian Forest of New Brunswick in the 21st century: what shifting heat and water balance implies for future stand dynamics and management Managing exploitation of freshwater species and aggregates to protect and restore freshwater biodiversity Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Assessing Watershed Scale Pollution Risk: A Review of Combined Approaches and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1