‘Chained to the pendulum of our own mad clockwork’: Science fiction, cyclicality and the new dark age during the Cold War

Q2 Arts and Humanities European Journal of American Culture Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1386/ejac_00005_1
M. Jancovich
{"title":"‘Chained to the pendulum of our own mad clockwork’: Science fiction, cyclicality and the new dark age during the Cold War","authors":"M. Jancovich","doi":"10.1386/ejac_00005_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although science fiction of the Golden Age in the 1940s and the 1950s is often associated with narratives of progress, this article demonstrates that there was a fascination within this period with narratives of cyclicality, rather than progress, narratives in which social and scientific systems collapse back into new dark ages and/or re-emerge out of such new dark ages. Furthermore, the article explores how these narratives were mobilized in relation to the Cold War and particularly the ways in which nationalist agendas were seen as repressing the international exchange of ideas that many science fiction writers regarded as central to science. However, these stories did not simply oppose politics with science so that the former was associated with ignorance and repression and the latter with knowledge and liberation. On the contrary, these stories were preoccupied with conceptual crises, in which one system of thought was overthrown by another. In other words, these were stories of scientific revolution rather than linear progress and they often presented all systems of thought as potentially restrictive. In short, these cyclical narratives were a reminder of a challenge from which many science fiction writers believed that science could not escape, a challenge that would therefore continually reassert itself: the narratives demonstrated that scientists not only needed to take responsibility for their discoveries but also to recognize that the advancement of science did not inevitably lead to (or even go hand in hand with) social, political or cultural enlightenment.","PeriodicalId":35235,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of American Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of American Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ejac_00005_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although science fiction of the Golden Age in the 1940s and the 1950s is often associated with narratives of progress, this article demonstrates that there was a fascination within this period with narratives of cyclicality, rather than progress, narratives in which social and scientific systems collapse back into new dark ages and/or re-emerge out of such new dark ages. Furthermore, the article explores how these narratives were mobilized in relation to the Cold War and particularly the ways in which nationalist agendas were seen as repressing the international exchange of ideas that many science fiction writers regarded as central to science. However, these stories did not simply oppose politics with science so that the former was associated with ignorance and repression and the latter with knowledge and liberation. On the contrary, these stories were preoccupied with conceptual crises, in which one system of thought was overthrown by another. In other words, these were stories of scientific revolution rather than linear progress and they often presented all systems of thought as potentially restrictive. In short, these cyclical narratives were a reminder of a challenge from which many science fiction writers believed that science could not escape, a challenge that would therefore continually reassert itself: the narratives demonstrated that scientists not only needed to take responsibility for their discoveries but also to recognize that the advancement of science did not inevitably lead to (or even go hand in hand with) social, political or cultural enlightenment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“被束缚在我们自己疯狂钟表的钟摆上”:科幻小说、周期性和冷战时期的新黑暗时代
尽管20世纪40年代和50年代黄金时代的科幻小说经常与进步叙事联系在一起,但这篇文章表明,在这一时期,人们对循环性叙事而非进步叙事着迷,在这种叙事中,社会和科学系统崩溃回到新的黑暗时代和/或从新的黑暗年代重新出现。此外,文章探讨了这些叙事是如何在冷战中被动员起来的,特别是民族主义议程被视为压制国际思想交流的方式,许多科幻作家认为这是科学的核心。然而,这些故事并不是简单地将政治与科学对立起来,因此前者与无知和压迫联系在一起,后者与知识和解放联系在一起。相反,这些故事充斥着概念危机,其中一种思想体系被另一种推翻。换言之,这些都是科学革命的故事,而不是线性进步的故事,它们往往将所有思想体系都呈现为潜在的限制性。简言之,这些周期性的叙事提醒我们,许多科幻作家认为科学无法逃脱这一挑战,因此,这一挑战将不断重申:这些叙述表明,科学家不仅需要对自己的发现负责,还需要认识到科学的进步并不会不可避免地带来(甚至与)社会、政治或文化启蒙齐头并进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of American Culture
European Journal of American Culture Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Editors’ Introduction ‘What did we prove?’: William Wyler’s The Big Country (1958) and the revisionism of Westerns Sisyphus on horseback: Landscape allegory in the postwar Western Mechanisms of time in video game Westerns from Gun Fight to Red Dead Redemption 2 Between ‘Ich will Spaß’ and ‘99 Jahre Krieg’: Receptions of the ‘New German Wave’ in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1