The perfect match? Assessment of excess commute and transport externalities using an agent-based transport model

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1080/15568318.2023.2181116
Nico Kuehnel, Qin Zhang, C. Staves, R. Moeckel
{"title":"The perfect match? Assessment of excess commute and transport externalities using an agent-based transport model","authors":"Nico Kuehnel, Qin Zhang, C. Staves, R. Moeckel","doi":"10.1080/15568318.2023.2181116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Excess commute (EC) refers to the sub-optimal allocation of workers to jobs in an urban region in terms of minimal commute distances. This article investigated EC for the Munich metropolitan area using a microscopic agent-based modeling suite. We first considered the optimization strategy, comparing the traditional zone-based transportation problem to a microscopic routine. Zone-based optimization is computationally efficient, but it underestimates EC due to spatial biases, even when the zone system is highly disaggregate. We then applied the optimized job-worker assignment to a microscopic travel demand model, assigning workers to jobs of the same job sector at a shorter distance from their home, accounting for multi-worker households. With shorter commutes, there was a substantial shift toward active modes. However, we only observed moderate impacts on total travel demand, with the overall effect dampened due to compensatory behavior between mandatory and discretionary travel. Finally, the outputs from the demand model were used by a microscopic assignment model to calculate externalities attributable to EC. Because of the complexity of travel demand, we conclude that the EC indicator alone would overestimate the benefits of policies targeting jobs-housing balance.","PeriodicalId":47824,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2023.2181116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Excess commute (EC) refers to the sub-optimal allocation of workers to jobs in an urban region in terms of minimal commute distances. This article investigated EC for the Munich metropolitan area using a microscopic agent-based modeling suite. We first considered the optimization strategy, comparing the traditional zone-based transportation problem to a microscopic routine. Zone-based optimization is computationally efficient, but it underestimates EC due to spatial biases, even when the zone system is highly disaggregate. We then applied the optimized job-worker assignment to a microscopic travel demand model, assigning workers to jobs of the same job sector at a shorter distance from their home, accounting for multi-worker households. With shorter commutes, there was a substantial shift toward active modes. However, we only observed moderate impacts on total travel demand, with the overall effect dampened due to compensatory behavior between mandatory and discretionary travel. Finally, the outputs from the demand model were used by a microscopic assignment model to calculate externalities attributable to EC. Because of the complexity of travel demand, we conclude that the EC indicator alone would overestimate the benefits of policies targeting jobs-housing balance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完美的匹配?使用基于代理的运输模型评估过度通勤和运输外部性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Transportation provides a discussion forum for the exchange of new and innovative ideas on sustainable transportation research in the context of environmental, economical, social, and engineering aspects, as well as current and future interactions of transportation systems and other urban subsystems. The scope includes the examination of overall sustainability of any transportation system, including its infrastructure, vehicle, operation, and maintenance; the integration of social science disciplines, engineering, and information technology with transportation; the understanding of the comparative aspects of different transportation systems from a global perspective; qualitative and quantitative transportation studies; and case studies, surveys, and expository papers in an international or local context. Equal emphasis is placed on the problems of sustainable transportation that are associated with passenger and freight transportation modes in both industrialized and non-industrialized areas. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert reviewers. All peer review is single-blind. Submissions are made online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Driving the future: How value retention rate shapes electric vehicle adoption Last mile delivery with drones: A carbon emissions comparison Perceived seriousness of environmental issues and the influence of willingness to pay for hybrid vehicles: An anthropological extension of the theory of planned behavior Cargo bikes for personal transport: A user segmentation based on motivations for use Am I really willing to use my electric vehicle sustainably? A study on the charging preferences of electric vehicle users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1