{"title":"Prelicensure Nursing Clinical Simulation and Regulation During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Nicole Kaminski-Ozturk PhD, Brendan Martin PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00090-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, many boards of nursing (BONs) in the United States issued emergency orders to allow prelicensure RN nursing programs greater flexibility regarding simulation use.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To understand how state BONs adjusted their simulation regulations to support prelicensure nursing programs and how prelicensure nursing programs in turn drew upon this revised guidance to safely deliver clinical education during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Simulation-related BON regulations were reviewed before and during the pandemic and classified by the degree of change. All active U.S. prelicensure RN programs were then surveyed in the summer of 2020 about prior and anticipated (fall 2020) simulation usage. Data from each phase were then merged to determine how jurisdictional changes informed simulation substitution levels at the program level. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine the significance of identified trends.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Early in the pandemic, nearly half (<em>n</em> = 24) of states issued emergency orders to allow for the expanded use of simulation-based education (SBE) in prelicensure nursing programs. A total of 526 prelicensure RN programs participated in the survey, yielding a 32.8% response rate. Most programs increased their use of SBE, with the most pronounced changes occurring in jurisdictions in which emergency orders modified or waived existing clinical substitution thresholds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Proactive BON emergency orders and policies provided the necessary flexibility for prelicensure RN programs to maintain the continuity of prelicensure RN students’ education early in the pandemic when many clinical sites imposed significant onsite restrictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215582562300090X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many boards of nursing (BONs) in the United States issued emergency orders to allow prelicensure RN nursing programs greater flexibility regarding simulation use.
Purpose
To understand how state BONs adjusted their simulation regulations to support prelicensure nursing programs and how prelicensure nursing programs in turn drew upon this revised guidance to safely deliver clinical education during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
Simulation-related BON regulations were reviewed before and during the pandemic and classified by the degree of change. All active U.S. prelicensure RN programs were then surveyed in the summer of 2020 about prior and anticipated (fall 2020) simulation usage. Data from each phase were then merged to determine how jurisdictional changes informed simulation substitution levels at the program level. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine the significance of identified trends.
Results
Early in the pandemic, nearly half (n = 24) of states issued emergency orders to allow for the expanded use of simulation-based education (SBE) in prelicensure nursing programs. A total of 526 prelicensure RN programs participated in the survey, yielding a 32.8% response rate. Most programs increased their use of SBE, with the most pronounced changes occurring in jurisdictions in which emergency orders modified or waived existing clinical substitution thresholds.
Conclusion
Proactive BON emergency orders and policies provided the necessary flexibility for prelicensure RN programs to maintain the continuity of prelicensure RN students’ education early in the pandemic when many clinical sites imposed significant onsite restrictions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.