Improving Efficiencies of Ratio- and Product-type Estimators for Estimating Population Mean for Time-based Survey

Pub Date : 2022-05-07 DOI:10.13052/jrss0974-8024.15113
Priyanka Chhaparwal, Sanjay Kumar
{"title":"Improving Efficiencies of Ratio- and Product-type Estimators for Estimating Population Mean for Time-based Survey","authors":"Priyanka Chhaparwal, Sanjay Kumar","doi":"10.13052/jrss0974-8024.15113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statisticians often use auxiliary information at an estimation stage to increase efficiencies of estimators. In this article, we suggest modified ratio- and product-type estimators utilizing the known value of the coefficient of variation of the auxiliary variable for a time-based survey. Further, to excel the performance of the suggested estimators, we utilize information from the past surveys along with the current surveys through hybrid exponentially weighted average. We obtain expressions for biases and mean square errors of the suggested estimators. The conditions, under which the suggested estimators have less mean square errors than that of other existing estimators, are also obtained. The results obtained through an empirical analysis examine the use of information from past surveys along with current surveys and show that the mean square errors and biases of the suggested estimators are less than that of the existing estimators. For example: for a sample size 5, mean square error and bias of the suggested ratio-type estimator are (0.0414,0.0065) which are less than (0.5581,0.0944) of the existing Cochran (1940) estimator, (0.4788,0.0758), of Sisodia and Dwivedi (1981) estimator and (0.0482,0.0082) of Muhammad Noor-ul-Amin (2020) estimator. Similarly, mean square error and bias of the suggested product- type estimator are (0.0025,−0.0006) which are less than (0.0612,−0.0096) of the existing Murthy (1964) estimator, (0.0286,−0.0071), of Pandey and Dubey (1988) estimator and (0.0053,−0.0008) of Muhammad Noor-ul-Amin (2020) estimator.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.15113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Statisticians often use auxiliary information at an estimation stage to increase efficiencies of estimators. In this article, we suggest modified ratio- and product-type estimators utilizing the known value of the coefficient of variation of the auxiliary variable for a time-based survey. Further, to excel the performance of the suggested estimators, we utilize information from the past surveys along with the current surveys through hybrid exponentially weighted average. We obtain expressions for biases and mean square errors of the suggested estimators. The conditions, under which the suggested estimators have less mean square errors than that of other existing estimators, are also obtained. The results obtained through an empirical analysis examine the use of information from past surveys along with current surveys and show that the mean square errors and biases of the suggested estimators are less than that of the existing estimators. For example: for a sample size 5, mean square error and bias of the suggested ratio-type estimator are (0.0414,0.0065) which are less than (0.5581,0.0944) of the existing Cochran (1940) estimator, (0.4788,0.0758), of Sisodia and Dwivedi (1981) estimator and (0.0482,0.0082) of Muhammad Noor-ul-Amin (2020) estimator. Similarly, mean square error and bias of the suggested product- type estimator are (0.0025,−0.0006) which are less than (0.0612,−0.0096) of the existing Murthy (1964) estimator, (0.0286,−0.0071), of Pandey and Dubey (1988) estimator and (0.0053,−0.0008) of Muhammad Noor-ul-Amin (2020) estimator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
提高比率型和乘积型估计器在基于时间的调查中估计总体平均值的效率
统计学家经常在估计阶段使用辅助信息来提高估计的效率。在这篇文章中,我们建议使用辅助变量变异系数的已知值对基于时间的调查进行修正的比率和乘积类型估计。此外,为了提高建议估计量的性能,我们通过混合指数加权平均值利用了过去调查和当前调查的信息。我们得到了所建议的估计量的偏差和均方误差的表达式。还得到了所提出的估计量的均方误差小于其他现有估计量的条件。通过实证分析获得的结果检验了过去调查和当前调查中信息的使用情况,并表明所建议的估计量的均方误差和偏差小于现有估计量。例如:对于样本量为5的情况,所建议的比率型估计器的均方误差和偏差为(0.0414,0.0065),小于现有的Cochran(1940)估计器(0.5581,0.0944)、Sisodia和Dwivedi(1981)估计量(0.4788,0.0758)和Muhammad Noor ul Amin(2020)估计量的(0.0482,0.0082)。类似地,所提出的乘积型估计器的均方误差和偏差为(0.0025,−0.0006),小于现有Murthy(1964)估计器(0.0612,−0.0096)、Pandey和Dubey(1988)估计量(0.0286,−0.0071)和Muhammad Noor ul Amin(2020)估计量的(0.0053,−0.0008)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1