Introduction to the special issue on “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains”

IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Operations Management Pub Date : 2022-09-21 DOI:10.1002/joom.1216
Gregory R. Heim, Xiaosong (David) Peng
{"title":"Introduction to the special issue on “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains”","authors":"Gregory R. Heim,&nbsp;Xiaosong (David) Peng","doi":"10.1002/joom.1216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technology Management (TM) has long held an important place in operations management (OM) literature. Since the 1990s, TM topics have made up a substantial portion of the papers published in <i>Journal of Operations Management</i> (JOM). Today, the speed of development and innovative uses of new technologies across the globe create many new research opportunities and challenges (Heim et al., <span>2021</span>), motivating the current special issue.</p><p>TM research often overlaps with other academic research fields (e.g., technology innovation in organization strategy, information technology [IT] in management information systems [MIS]). Yet, TM issues of interest to operations managers tend to differ in focus, detail, time horizon, and scope from the issues examined in those literatures. TM research in JOM usually delves into the within-firm interface between technology and process change as well as the performance impacts of technology on operations (as explained in the TM department's recent editorial [Heim et al., <span>2021</span>]).</p><p>Technology concerns the application of resources and skills by humans to achieve specific aims. Burgelman et al. (<span>2003</span>) defined technology as “theoretical and practical knowledge, skills, and artifacts that can be used to develop products and services as well as their production and delivery systems.” Along similar lines, Gaimon (<span>2008</span>) defined technology as “the embodiment and deployment of technical and scientific knowledge and discoveries that lead to the creation of goods and services.” Changes in technology can lead to substantial changes in the organization and accomplishment of work (Browning, <span>2020</span>; Heim &amp; Peng, <span>2010</span>; Jaikumar, <span>1988</span>). TM<sup>1</sup> provides an inclusive term for managerial activities and academic research pertaining to the generation, deployment, and use of technology. Gaimon (<span>2008</span>) suggested the TM field addresses “how to develop, adapt, and exploit technological capabilities to create new or improved products or services to accomplish the strategic goals of an organization.”</p><p>Diverse contemporary technology developments provide many new research contexts and questions, seeding the research questions behind the innovative papers in this Special Issue. This diversity required that we keep an open mind regarding what research topics today reside among the scope of issues for TM research in OM and supply chain management (OM/SCM). The technology used today for process change may come in the form of software codes, hardware, material processing and handling technology, and consumer devices and enterprise applications. With an increasing need for global, real-time integration and coordination of demand and supply, operations managers must continue to evaluate and install new technology configurations to deploy processes that hopefully will accomplish their aims.</p><p>Ultimately, operations managers are responsible for making sure that the coordinated use of modern technology ensures the intended outcomes of operational systems, whether for local, idiosyncratic needs or global, enterprise needs. Today's operations managers are often actively involved in technology decisions, partnering with top management (and many other stakeholders) during technology selection, installation, and lifecycle decisions. Operations managers must nurture collaborative partnerships to ensure technology evaluation and implementation decisions are aligned with the sourcing and delivery needs of manufacturing and service operations.</p><p>With the above as context, we offer a collection of what we believe are excellent papers examining contemporary topics related to the special issue's theme of “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains.” We begin by first reviewing JOM's historical contributions to classic TM research themes and acknowledging the corpus of TM literature in JOM to which this SI contributes. This exercise then enables us to offer up initial responses to the questions, “What's missing?” and “What's next?”</p><p>The editorial is structured as follows. Section 2 discusses TM empirical research achievements to date, focusing on JOM. Section 3 introduces the papers in this special issue, suggests what research may still be missing, and points out where TM research efforts might focus next. Section 4 concludes and thanks the Reviewers and Editors who made this special issue possible.</p><p>As a prologue for the special issue, we gather existing JOM papers that fall within the historical scope of TM literature. In the early years of JOM (1980s), a focus on emerging technology and its consequences started with research enquiries into technology choice, group technology, and material requirements planning (MRP) systems. This research later transitioned toward impacts of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems (1990s). Post-2000 research examined implications of internet-based technology implemented then, dramatically affecting modern OM/SCM processes. Overall, JOM authors have made significant contributions to insights about OM/SCM technology and TM roles in OM/SCM.</p><p>We chose our list of JOM's TM articles to discuss in a structured manner. To identify articles, we performed searches on JOM's Elsevier and Wiley search engine websites<sup>2</sup> using terms such as “technology”, “technology management”, “IT”, “information technology”, “technology strategy”, “technology outsourcing”, and terms specifically related to each topic area. We considered whether each suggested paper fit within TM. The articles were subjectively categorized into groups. We synthesize the articles for each group. Still, the following discussion should not be viewed as comprehensive in a scientific sense.<sup>3</sup> We simply hope to convey the enormous breadth of TM research insights from JOM as well as provide context for the Special Issue.</p><p>We next summarize prior TM literature from JOM. We first group JOM's TM studies into classic TM topics about how to make sense of technology, evaluate and select technology, innovate via technology and diffuse technology to users, choose and adopt technology, design/redesign technology, use and react to technology, learn via technology, develop technology, integrate technology, improve firm performance via technology-enabled operations and supply chains, and outsource technology-enabled systems and services. We then group salient JOM TM studies by their technology application focus: manufacturing, service, retail, healthcare, enterprise/inter-enterprise, e-business, and new product/new service technology. We acknowledge papers in JOM often incorporate two or more TM themes, making any categorization of prior papers imprecise. Still, while our classification is by no means perfect, it is illustrative of the topical associations for historical TM papers from JOM.</p><p>Given the many ongoing developments in technology, technological innovation in products and services, and TM across the globe, we believe it is a fantastic time to work on TM research. We have enjoyed guiding the submitted papers through the review process and hope we have been fair with our guidance and decisions about which papers to ultimately include in this special issue. We also hope the reader will enjoy reading this special issue as much as we have enjoyed working through the process of developing the authors' manuscripts.</p><p>Finally, we note this special issue is the product of many individuals' efforts. We deeply thank the many Special Guest Editors, Associate Editors, Editorial Review Board members, and Reviewers who contributed their time and talents to serve in developmental roles for the special issue. Without their efforts to nurture the papers, this special set of papers about modern technology developments would not have come to fruition.</p><p><b>Special Issue Guest Editors:</b></p><p>Gregory R. Heim, Texas A&amp;M University</p><p>Xiaosong (David) Peng, Lehigh University</p><p>Guangzhi Shang, Florida State University (handled one paper due to conflict of interest with the other Guest Editors)</p><p><b>Associate Editors:</b></p><p>Anupam Agrawal, Texas A&amp;M University</p><p>Daniel Q. Chen, Texas Christian University</p><p>Adrian Choo, Michigan State University</p><p>David Dobrzykowski, University of Arkansas</p><p>Yan Dong, University of South Carolina</p><p>Cheryl Druehl, George Mason University</p><p>Matthias Holweg, University of Oxford</p><p>Kevin Linderman, Pennsylvania State University</p><p>Guanyi Lu, Florida State University</p><p>Rich Metters, Texas A&amp;M University</p><p>Annibal Sodero, The Ohio State University</p><p>Rui Souza, Catholic University of Portugal</p><p>Martin Spring, Lancaster University</p><p>Gregory Stock, Northern Arizona University</p><p>Sriram Thirumalai, Texas Christian University</p><p>Stephan Wagner, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich</p><p>Frank Weingarten, ESADE Business School</p><p>Kefeng Xu, The University of Texas at San Antonio</p><p><b>Special Issue Guest Associate Editors:</b></p><p>Ednilson Bernardes, West Virginia University</p><p>Jun Li, University of Michigan</p><p><b>Editorial Review Board and Ad Hoc Reviewers:</b></p><p>George Ball, Indiana University</p><p>Aaron Bonnett, Texas A&amp;M University</p><p>Alistair Brandon-Jones, University of Bath</p><p>Carlos Candido, University of Algarve</p><p>Tsan-Ming Choi, National Taiwan University</p><p>Howard Chuang, National Chengchi University</p><p>Yun-Kung Chung, Yuan-Ze University</p><p>Pamela Danese, University of Padova</p><p>Xin (David) Ding, Rutgers Business School</p><p>Michael Dixon, Utah State University</p><p>Kevin Dooley, Arizona State University</p><p>Necati Ertekin, University of Minnesota</p><p>Shaokun Fan, Oregon State University</p><p>Jordana George, Texas A&amp;M University</p><p>Jing Gong, Lehigh University</p><p>Jury Gualandris, Western University</p><p>Xiaowen Huang, Miami University</p><p>Noyan Ilk, Florida State University</p><p>Xingzhi Jia, Renmin University of China</p><p>Justin Kistler, University of Tennessee, Knoxville</p><p>Maneesh Kumar, Cardiff University</p><p>Hugo Lam, The University of Liverpool</p><p>Benn Lawson, University of Cambridge</p><p>Seung Jun Lee, Chung-Ang University</p><p>Xiaojin Liu, Virginia Commonwealth University</p><p>Mayukh Majumdar, University of San Diego</p><p>Erika Marsillac, Old Dominion University</p><p>Brett Massimino, Virginia Commonwealth University</p><p>Saif Mir, Lehigh University</p><p>Ujjal Mukherjee, University of Illinois</p><p>Adegoke Oke, Arizona State University</p><p>Carrie Queenan, University of South Carolina</p><p>Yoonseock Son, University of Notre Dame</p><p>Jon Stauffer, Texas A&amp;M University</p><p>Fabian Sting, Erasmus University</p><p>Caroline Swift, University of Delaware</p><p>Frédéric Thiesse, University of Würzburg</p><p>Sriram Venkataraman, University of South Carolina</p><p>Ivanka Visnjic, ESADE Business School</p><p>Matthew Walsman, Rutgers University</p><p>Lan Wang, University of Miami</p><p>Urban Wemmerlov, University of Wisconsin-Madison</p><p>Xun Xu, California State University, Stanislaus</p><p>Yang Yang, University of Texas at El Paso</p><p>Dawei (David) Zhang, Lehigh University</p><p>Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang, University of North Florida</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"68 6-7","pages":"536-559"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1216","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.1216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technology Management (TM) has long held an important place in operations management (OM) literature. Since the 1990s, TM topics have made up a substantial portion of the papers published in Journal of Operations Management (JOM). Today, the speed of development and innovative uses of new technologies across the globe create many new research opportunities and challenges (Heim et al., 2021), motivating the current special issue.

TM research often overlaps with other academic research fields (e.g., technology innovation in organization strategy, information technology [IT] in management information systems [MIS]). Yet, TM issues of interest to operations managers tend to differ in focus, detail, time horizon, and scope from the issues examined in those literatures. TM research in JOM usually delves into the within-firm interface between technology and process change as well as the performance impacts of technology on operations (as explained in the TM department's recent editorial [Heim et al., 2021]).

Technology concerns the application of resources and skills by humans to achieve specific aims. Burgelman et al. (2003) defined technology as “theoretical and practical knowledge, skills, and artifacts that can be used to develop products and services as well as their production and delivery systems.” Along similar lines, Gaimon (2008) defined technology as “the embodiment and deployment of technical and scientific knowledge and discoveries that lead to the creation of goods and services.” Changes in technology can lead to substantial changes in the organization and accomplishment of work (Browning, 2020; Heim & Peng, 2010; Jaikumar, 1988). TM1 provides an inclusive term for managerial activities and academic research pertaining to the generation, deployment, and use of technology. Gaimon (2008) suggested the TM field addresses “how to develop, adapt, and exploit technological capabilities to create new or improved products or services to accomplish the strategic goals of an organization.”

Diverse contemporary technology developments provide many new research contexts and questions, seeding the research questions behind the innovative papers in this Special Issue. This diversity required that we keep an open mind regarding what research topics today reside among the scope of issues for TM research in OM and supply chain management (OM/SCM). The technology used today for process change may come in the form of software codes, hardware, material processing and handling technology, and consumer devices and enterprise applications. With an increasing need for global, real-time integration and coordination of demand and supply, operations managers must continue to evaluate and install new technology configurations to deploy processes that hopefully will accomplish their aims.

Ultimately, operations managers are responsible for making sure that the coordinated use of modern technology ensures the intended outcomes of operational systems, whether for local, idiosyncratic needs or global, enterprise needs. Today's operations managers are often actively involved in technology decisions, partnering with top management (and many other stakeholders) during technology selection, installation, and lifecycle decisions. Operations managers must nurture collaborative partnerships to ensure technology evaluation and implementation decisions are aligned with the sourcing and delivery needs of manufacturing and service operations.

With the above as context, we offer a collection of what we believe are excellent papers examining contemporary topics related to the special issue's theme of “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains.” We begin by first reviewing JOM's historical contributions to classic TM research themes and acknowledging the corpus of TM literature in JOM to which this SI contributes. This exercise then enables us to offer up initial responses to the questions, “What's missing?” and “What's next?”

The editorial is structured as follows. Section 2 discusses TM empirical research achievements to date, focusing on JOM. Section 3 introduces the papers in this special issue, suggests what research may still be missing, and points out where TM research efforts might focus next. Section 4 concludes and thanks the Reviewers and Editors who made this special issue possible.

As a prologue for the special issue, we gather existing JOM papers that fall within the historical scope of TM literature. In the early years of JOM (1980s), a focus on emerging technology and its consequences started with research enquiries into technology choice, group technology, and material requirements planning (MRP) systems. This research later transitioned toward impacts of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems (1990s). Post-2000 research examined implications of internet-based technology implemented then, dramatically affecting modern OM/SCM processes. Overall, JOM authors have made significant contributions to insights about OM/SCM technology and TM roles in OM/SCM.

We chose our list of JOM's TM articles to discuss in a structured manner. To identify articles, we performed searches on JOM's Elsevier and Wiley search engine websites2 using terms such as “technology”, “technology management”, “IT”, “information technology”, “technology strategy”, “technology outsourcing”, and terms specifically related to each topic area. We considered whether each suggested paper fit within TM. The articles were subjectively categorized into groups. We synthesize the articles for each group. Still, the following discussion should not be viewed as comprehensive in a scientific sense.3 We simply hope to convey the enormous breadth of TM research insights from JOM as well as provide context for the Special Issue.

We next summarize prior TM literature from JOM. We first group JOM's TM studies into classic TM topics about how to make sense of technology, evaluate and select technology, innovate via technology and diffuse technology to users, choose and adopt technology, design/redesign technology, use and react to technology, learn via technology, develop technology, integrate technology, improve firm performance via technology-enabled operations and supply chains, and outsource technology-enabled systems and services. We then group salient JOM TM studies by their technology application focus: manufacturing, service, retail, healthcare, enterprise/inter-enterprise, e-business, and new product/new service technology. We acknowledge papers in JOM often incorporate two or more TM themes, making any categorization of prior papers imprecise. Still, while our classification is by no means perfect, it is illustrative of the topical associations for historical TM papers from JOM.

Given the many ongoing developments in technology, technological innovation in products and services, and TM across the globe, we believe it is a fantastic time to work on TM research. We have enjoyed guiding the submitted papers through the review process and hope we have been fair with our guidance and decisions about which papers to ultimately include in this special issue. We also hope the reader will enjoy reading this special issue as much as we have enjoyed working through the process of developing the authors' manuscripts.

Finally, we note this special issue is the product of many individuals' efforts. We deeply thank the many Special Guest Editors, Associate Editors, Editorial Review Board members, and Reviewers who contributed their time and talents to serve in developmental roles for the special issue. Without their efforts to nurture the papers, this special set of papers about modern technology developments would not have come to fruition.

Special Issue Guest Editors:

Gregory R. Heim, Texas A&M University

Xiaosong (David) Peng, Lehigh University

Guangzhi Shang, Florida State University (handled one paper due to conflict of interest with the other Guest Editors)

Associate Editors:

Anupam Agrawal, Texas A&M University

Daniel Q. Chen, Texas Christian University

Adrian Choo, Michigan State University

David Dobrzykowski, University of Arkansas

Yan Dong, University of South Carolina

Cheryl Druehl, George Mason University

Matthias Holweg, University of Oxford

Kevin Linderman, Pennsylvania State University

Guanyi Lu, Florida State University

Rich Metters, Texas A&M University

Annibal Sodero, The Ohio State University

Rui Souza, Catholic University of Portugal

Martin Spring, Lancaster University

Gregory Stock, Northern Arizona University

Sriram Thirumalai, Texas Christian University

Stephan Wagner, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich

Frank Weingarten, ESADE Business School

Kefeng Xu, The University of Texas at San Antonio

Special Issue Guest Associate Editors:

Ednilson Bernardes, West Virginia University

Jun Li, University of Michigan

Editorial Review Board and Ad Hoc Reviewers:

George Ball, Indiana University

Aaron Bonnett, Texas A&M University

Alistair Brandon-Jones, University of Bath

Carlos Candido, University of Algarve

Tsan-Ming Choi, National Taiwan University

Howard Chuang, National Chengchi University

Yun-Kung Chung, Yuan-Ze University

Pamela Danese, University of Padova

Xin (David) Ding, Rutgers Business School

Michael Dixon, Utah State University

Kevin Dooley, Arizona State University

Necati Ertekin, University of Minnesota

Shaokun Fan, Oregon State University

Jordana George, Texas A&M University

Jing Gong, Lehigh University

Jury Gualandris, Western University

Xiaowen Huang, Miami University

Noyan Ilk, Florida State University

Xingzhi Jia, Renmin University of China

Justin Kistler, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Maneesh Kumar, Cardiff University

Hugo Lam, The University of Liverpool

Benn Lawson, University of Cambridge

Seung Jun Lee, Chung-Ang University

Xiaojin Liu, Virginia Commonwealth University

Mayukh Majumdar, University of San Diego

Erika Marsillac, Old Dominion University

Brett Massimino, Virginia Commonwealth University

Saif Mir, Lehigh University

Ujjal Mukherjee, University of Illinois

Adegoke Oke, Arizona State University

Carrie Queenan, University of South Carolina

Yoonseock Son, University of Notre Dame

Jon Stauffer, Texas A&M University

Fabian Sting, Erasmus University

Caroline Swift, University of Delaware

Frédéric Thiesse, University of Würzburg

Sriram Venkataraman, University of South Carolina

Ivanka Visnjic, ESADE Business School

Matthew Walsman, Rutgers University

Lan Wang, University of Miami

Urban Wemmerlov, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Xun Xu, California State University, Stanislaus

Yang Yang, University of Texas at El Paso

Dawei (David) Zhang, Lehigh University

Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang, University of North Florida

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“全球背景下的技术管理:从企业系统到技术颠覆性运营和供应链”特刊简介
长期以来,技术管理(TM)在运营管理(OM)文献中占有重要地位。自20世纪90年代以来,TM主题在《Journal of Operations Management》(JOM)上发表的论文中占据了相当大的一部分。今天,全球范围内新技术的发展速度和创新使用创造了许多新的研究机会和挑战(Heim et al., 2021),从而推动了当前的特刊。TM研究经常与其他学术研究领域重叠(例如,组织战略中的技术创新,管理信息系统中的信息技术)。然而,运营经理感兴趣的TM问题往往在焦点、细节、时间范围和范围上与那些文献中研究的问题不同。JOM的TM研究通常会深入研究技术和流程变化之间的公司内部接口,以及技术对运营的绩效影响(如TM部门最近的社论[Heim et al., 2021]所解释的那样)。技术涉及人类为实现特定目标而应用资源和技能。Burgelman等人(2003)将技术定义为“可用于开发产品和服务及其生产和交付系统的理论和实践知识、技能和工件”。与此类似,Gaimon(2008)将技术定义为“技术和科学知识的体现和部署,以及导致商品和服务创造的发现。”技术的变化可以导致工作组织和完成的实质性变化(Browning, 2020;海姆,彭,2010;Jaikumar, 1988)。TM1为与技术的产生、部署和使用有关的管理活动和学术研究提供了一个包容性的术语。Gaimon(2008)认为,TM领域关注的是“如何开发、适应和利用技术能力来创造新的或改进的产品或服务,以实现组织的战略目标。”多样化的当代科技发展提供了许多新的研究背景和问题,在这期特刊的创新论文背后播种了研究问题。这种多样性要求我们对今天的研究主题保持开放的心态,这些研究主题存在于OM和供应链管理(OM/SCM)中TM研究的问题范围中。今天用于过程变更的技术可能以软件代码、硬件、材料处理和处理技术以及消费者设备和企业应用程序的形式出现。随着对全球实时集成和供需协调需求的不断增长,运营经理必须继续评估和安装新的技术配置,以部署有望实现其目标的流程。最终,运营经理负责确保现代技术的协调使用确保运营系统的预期结果,无论是本地的、特殊的需求还是全球的、企业的需求。今天的运营经理经常积极参与技术决策,在技术选择、安装和生命周期决策中与高层管理人员(以及许多其他利益相关者)合作。运营经理必须培养合作伙伴关系,以确保技术评估和实施决策与制造和服务运营的采购和交付需求保持一致。在上述背景下,我们提供了一系列我们认为是优秀的论文,这些论文研究了与特刊主题“全球背景下的技术管理:从企业系统到颠覆性运营和供应链的技术”相关的当代主题。我们首先回顾JOM对经典TM研究主题的历史贡献,并承认本SI贡献的JOM TM文献语料库。然后,这个练习使我们能够对“缺少什么?”和“下一步是什么?”社论的结构如下:第2节讨论了TM迄今为止的实证研究成果,重点是JOM。第3部分介绍了本期特刊中的论文,指出了哪些研究可能仍然缺失,并指出了下一步TM研究的重点。第四部分总结并感谢使本期特刊成为可能的审稿人和编辑。作为特刊的序幕,我们收集了在TM文献历史范围内的现有JOM论文。在JOM的早期(20世纪80年代),对新兴技术及其后果的关注开始于对技术选择、组技术和材料需求计划(MRP)系统的研究。该研究后来转向先进制造技术(AMTs)和企业资源规划(ERP)系统的影响(20世纪90年代)。 2000年后的研究考察了当时实施的基于互联网的技术的影响,极大地影响了现代管理/供应链管理流程。总的来说,JOM作者对OM/SCM技术和TM在OM/SCM中的角色的见解做出了重大贡献。我们选择了JOM的TM文章列表,以结构化的方式进行讨论。为了识别文章,我们使用“技术”、“技术管理”、“IT”、“信息技术”、“技术战略”、“技术外包”等术语在JOM的爱思唯尔和威利搜索引擎网站上进行搜索,以及与每个主题领域相关的术语。我们考虑了每一篇建议的论文是否适合TM。这些文章被主观地分成几组。我们合成了每一组的文章。然而,从科学的意义上讲,下面的讨论不应该被看作是全面的我们只是希望传达来自JOM的广泛的TM研究见解,并为特刊提供背景。接下来,我们总结了JOM先前的TM文献。我们首先将JOM的TM研究归类为经典的TM主题,包括如何理解技术、评估和选择技术、通过技术创新和向用户传播技术、选择和采用技术、设计/重新设计技术、使用和应对技术、通过技术学习、开发技术、集成技术、通过技术支持的运营和供应链提高企业绩效、以及外包技术支持的系统和服务。然后,我们根据技术应用重点对JOM TM研究进行分组:制造业、服务业、零售业、医疗保健、企业/企业间、电子商务和新产品/新服务技术。我们承认,JOM中的论文通常包含两个或更多的TM主题,使得之前的论文的任何分类都不精确。尽管我们的分类并不完美,但它说明了JOM历史TM论文的主题关联。鉴于技术的不断发展、产品和服务的技术创新以及全球范围内的TM,我们相信这是一个从事TM研究的绝佳时机。我们很高兴指导提交的论文通过审查过程,并希望我们的指导和决定最终将哪些论文纳入本期特刊是公平的。我们也希望读者会喜欢阅读这个特刊,就像我们喜欢通过开发作者手稿的过程一样。最后,我们注意到这个特别问题是许多个人努力的结果。我们深深感谢许多特邀编辑、副编辑、编辑评审委员会成员和审稿人,他们贡献了自己的时间和才能,为本期特刊发挥了发展作用。如果没有他们的努力,这组关于现代技术发展的特殊论文就不会取得成果。特刊特邀编辑:Gregory R. Heim, Texas a&m University; xiaosong (David) Peng, Lehigh University; guangzhi Shang, Florida State University(处理一篇与其他特邀编辑利益冲突的论文);副编辑:Anupam Agrawal, Texas a&m University;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement. JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough. Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification. JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information When does it pay to be green? The strategic benefits of adoption speed Registered reports review for field experiments Helping hampered bidders—Do subsidy auctions work as intended? Steering through the storm: Environmental uncertainty and delivery performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1