Coexisting violence and self-harm: Dual harm in an early-stage male prison population

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2020-04-07 DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12169
Karen Slade, Andrew Forrester, Thom Baguley
{"title":"Coexisting violence and self-harm: Dual harm in an early-stage male prison population","authors":"Karen Slade,&nbsp;Andrew Forrester,&nbsp;Thom Baguley","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined the characteristics of men in prison who have a history of both self-harm and violence (known as <i>dual harm</i>) and the extent to which demographic and criminogenic factors, in-prison incidents, and self-harm method could differentiate men who dual harm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Official prison sample data were examined for the period April 2010 to November 2017 (<i>n</i> = 965). Regression analysis of all custodial incidents, demographic and offending information, and imprisonment experience, was undertaken.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Self-harm was associated with violence in prison, representing a 3.5-fold risk of violence compared with men who did not self-harm, after controlling for time in prison, age, and index offence. 60% of men who harmed themselves also engaged in custodial violence, while 32% who were violent also had a self-harm event. After controlling for age at first incident, 11% of the sample had custodial history of dual harm and they accounted for 56% of all recorded custodial incidents. They had a high probability of property damage and fire setting in prison and spent 40% longer in custody. Men who dual harmed used a greater variety of self-harm methods, with increased use of lethal methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Dual harm is prevalent, particularly among those who harm themselves in prison. Men who dual harm contribute excessively to the overall incident burden in prison and demonstrate behavioural variability and risk regarding both violence and self-harm. The findings challenge the usual distinctive management responses or that self-harm or violence is solely the responsibility of health or justice, with greater integration required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lcrp.12169","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the characteristics of men in prison who have a history of both self-harm and violence (known as dual harm) and the extent to which demographic and criminogenic factors, in-prison incidents, and self-harm method could differentiate men who dual harm.

Methods

Official prison sample data were examined for the period April 2010 to November 2017 (n = 965). Regression analysis of all custodial incidents, demographic and offending information, and imprisonment experience, was undertaken.

Results

Self-harm was associated with violence in prison, representing a 3.5-fold risk of violence compared with men who did not self-harm, after controlling for time in prison, age, and index offence. 60% of men who harmed themselves also engaged in custodial violence, while 32% who were violent also had a self-harm event. After controlling for age at first incident, 11% of the sample had custodial history of dual harm and they accounted for 56% of all recorded custodial incidents. They had a high probability of property damage and fire setting in prison and spent 40% longer in custody. Men who dual harmed used a greater variety of self-harm methods, with increased use of lethal methods.

Conclusion

Dual harm is prevalent, particularly among those who harm themselves in prison. Men who dual harm contribute excessively to the overall incident burden in prison and demonstrate behavioural variability and risk regarding both violence and self-harm. The findings challenge the usual distinctive management responses or that self-harm or violence is solely the responsibility of health or justice, with greater integration required.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共存的暴力和自残:早期男性监狱人群的双重伤害
目的:本研究调查了监狱中有自残和暴力史(称为双重伤害)的男性的特征,以及人口和犯罪因素、监狱事件和自残方法在多大程度上可以区分双重伤害的男性。方法:检查2010年4月至2017年11月期间的官方监狱样本数据(n=965)。对所有监禁事件、人口统计和犯罪信息以及监禁经历进行了回归分析。结果:在控制了入狱时间、年龄和指数犯罪后,自残与监狱中的暴力行为有关,与没有自残的男性相比,发生暴力的风险是前者的3.5倍。60%的自残男性也参与了监禁暴力,而32%的暴力男性也有自残事件。在控制了第一次事件的年龄后,11%的样本有双重伤害的监禁史,他们占所有记录在案的监禁事件的56%。他们在监狱中发生财产损失和纵火的可能性很高,被拘留的时间延长了40%)。双重伤害的男性使用了更多种类的自残方法,致命方法的使用也越来越多。结论:双重伤害很普遍,尤其是在那些在监狱里伤害自己的人中。双重伤害的男性过度加重了监狱中的总体事件负担,并表现出暴力和自残行为的可变性和风险。调查结果挑战了通常独特的管理对策,或者自我伤害或暴力完全是健康或正义的责任;需要更大的集成度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1