Climbing the Velvet Drainpipe Class background and career progression within the UK Civil Service

IF 5.2 1区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.1093/jopart/muac045
Sam Friedman
{"title":"Climbing the Velvet Drainpipe Class background and career progression within the UK Civil Service","authors":"Sam Friedman","doi":"10.1093/jopart/muac045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While the theory of representative bureaucracy originates from concerns about the class composition of the public sector workforce, questions of class background have been notably absent in subsequent scholarship. In this paper I take advantage of new data on the class backgrounds of UK civil servants (N= 308, 566) to, first, explore descriptively how class shapes the composition of the civil service, both vertically in terms of occupational grade and horizontally in terms of department, location and profession. I show that those from working-class backgrounds are not only under-represented in the Civil Service as a whole, but this skew is particularly acute in propulsive departments like the Treasury, locations like London and in the Senior Civil Service. This initial descriptive analysis then acts as the staging point for the central qualitative component of my analysis, drawing on 104 in-depth interviews across four case-study departments. Here I identify three unwritten rules of career progression that tend to act as barriers for those from working-class backgrounds; access to accelerator jobs, organisational ambiguity in promotion processes; and sorting into operational (versus policy) tracks that have progression bottlenecks. This analysis highlights the need for more work on class representation, as well as underlining how representative bureaucracy may be impeded by patterns of horizontal as well as vertical segregation, particularly in work areas that have an outsized influence on policy design.","PeriodicalId":48366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the theory of representative bureaucracy originates from concerns about the class composition of the public sector workforce, questions of class background have been notably absent in subsequent scholarship. In this paper I take advantage of new data on the class backgrounds of UK civil servants (N= 308, 566) to, first, explore descriptively how class shapes the composition of the civil service, both vertically in terms of occupational grade and horizontally in terms of department, location and profession. I show that those from working-class backgrounds are not only under-represented in the Civil Service as a whole, but this skew is particularly acute in propulsive departments like the Treasury, locations like London and in the Senior Civil Service. This initial descriptive analysis then acts as the staging point for the central qualitative component of my analysis, drawing on 104 in-depth interviews across four case-study departments. Here I identify three unwritten rules of career progression that tend to act as barriers for those from working-class backgrounds; access to accelerator jobs, organisational ambiguity in promotion processes; and sorting into operational (versus policy) tracks that have progression bottlenecks. This analysis highlights the need for more work on class representation, as well as underlining how representative bureaucracy may be impeded by patterns of horizontal as well as vertical segregation, particularly in work areas that have an outsized influence on policy design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国公务员队伍中攀登天鹅绒排水管阶级背景和职业发展
虽然代议制官僚主义的理论源于对公共部门劳动力阶级构成的担忧,但在随后的学术研究中,阶级背景的问题明显缺失。在本文中,我利用关于英国公务员阶级背景的新数据(N=308566),首先,描述性地探讨了阶级如何塑造公务员队伍的组成,包括职业等级的纵向和部门、地点和职业的横向。我表明,工人阶级背景的人不仅在整个公务员队伍中代表性不足,而且这种倾斜在财政部等推动部门、伦敦等地和高级公务员队伍中尤为严重。然后,这个最初的描述性分析作为我分析的核心定性部分的起点,利用四个案例研究部门的104次深入访谈。在这里,我确定了职业发展的三条不成文规则,这些规则往往会成为工人阶级背景的障碍;获得加速器工作的机会,晋升过程中的组织模糊性;以及对存在进展瓶颈的运营(与政策)轨道进行分类。这一分析强调了需要在阶级代表性方面做更多的工作,并强调了代表性官僚机构可能会受到横向和纵向隔离模式的阻碍,特别是在对政策设计有巨大影响的工作领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory serves as a bridge between public administration or public management scholarship and public policy studies. The Journal aims to provide in-depth analysis of developments in the organizational, administrative, and policy sciences as they apply to government and governance. Each issue brings you critical perspectives and cogent analyses, serving as an outlet for the best theoretical and research work in the field. The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory is the official journal of the Public Management Research Association.
期刊最新文献
Procedural Politicking for What? Bureaucratic Reputation and Democratic Governance Will trust move mountains? Fostering radical ideas in public organizations Does enforcement style influence citizen trust in regulatory agencies? An experiment in six countries Deservingness, humanness, and representation through lived experience: analyzing first responders’ attitudes Emotional capital in citizen agency: Contesting administrative burden through anger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1