A Preliminary Study of Clinical Practice and Prenatal Nutrition in Rural Kansas.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-09 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol15.15803
Kelsey J Tenpenny, Adrianne K Griebel-Thompson, Morgan C Weiler, Susan E Carlson, Michael Kennedy
{"title":"A Preliminary Study of Clinical Practice and Prenatal Nutrition in Rural Kansas.","authors":"Kelsey J Tenpenny, Adrianne K Griebel-Thompson, Morgan C Weiler, Susan E Carlson, Michael Kennedy","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.15803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary purpose of this study was to determine if new recommendations for prenatal supplements of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and choline have been implemented into care by physicians who care for pregnant women in rural Kansas communities. Both nutrients are inadequate in the diet of most pregnant women in the U.S., and not all prenatal supplements provide DHA and choline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross sectional web-based survey was developed and provided by the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) students to 44 rural Kansas clinics believed to have physicians who provide obstetrical care. Questions about DHA and choline were embedded in a larger survey focused on prenatal care. A total of 29 surveys were returned, however, only 21 were completed by physicians who provided obstetrical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DHA (3/21) and choline (0/21) rarely were singled out for recommendation in contrast to folic acid (16/21) and iron (14/21). Participants stated that most women sought prenatal care during the first trimester of their pregnancy and indicated that they recommended prenatal vitamins at the first visit. Eleven gave patients a prescription for prenatal vitamins. The remaining patients either chose traditional over the counter prenatal vitamin capsules or less traditional chewable (gummy) vitamins, which provided lower concentrations of nutrients. Common barriers to nutritional counseling were limited resources and time constraints. Clinicians assessed their confidence and ability to provide nutritional counseling as moderate and competent, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>New nutritional recommendations for DHA and choline have not been implemented into standard of care in rural Kansas.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"55-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.15803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The primary purpose of this study was to determine if new recommendations for prenatal supplements of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and choline have been implemented into care by physicians who care for pregnant women in rural Kansas communities. Both nutrients are inadequate in the diet of most pregnant women in the U.S., and not all prenatal supplements provide DHA and choline.

Methods: A cross sectional web-based survey was developed and provided by the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) students to 44 rural Kansas clinics believed to have physicians who provide obstetrical care. Questions about DHA and choline were embedded in a larger survey focused on prenatal care. A total of 29 surveys were returned, however, only 21 were completed by physicians who provided obstetrical care.

Results: DHA (3/21) and choline (0/21) rarely were singled out for recommendation in contrast to folic acid (16/21) and iron (14/21). Participants stated that most women sought prenatal care during the first trimester of their pregnancy and indicated that they recommended prenatal vitamins at the first visit. Eleven gave patients a prescription for prenatal vitamins. The remaining patients either chose traditional over the counter prenatal vitamin capsules or less traditional chewable (gummy) vitamins, which provided lower concentrations of nutrients. Common barriers to nutritional counseling were limited resources and time constraints. Clinicians assessed their confidence and ability to provide nutritional counseling as moderate and competent, respectively.

Conclusions: New nutritional recommendations for DHA and choline have not been implemented into standard of care in rural Kansas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
堪萨斯州农村地区临床实践与产前营养的初步研究
引言本研究的主要目的是确定堪萨斯州农村社区护理孕妇的医生是否已将产前补充二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)和胆碱的新建议纳入护理中。这两种营养素在美国大多数孕妇的饮食中都不足,而且并非所有产前补充剂都能提供DHA和胆碱。方法堪萨斯大学医学中心(KUMC)的学生对44家据信有产科医生的堪萨斯州农村诊所进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查。关于DHA和胆碱的问题包含在一项更大规模的产前护理调查中。总共返回了29项调查,但只有21项是由提供产科护理的医生完成的。结果与叶酸(16/21)和铁(14/21)相比,DHA(3/21)和胆碱(0/21)很少被单独推荐。与会者表示,大多数妇女在怀孕的前三个月寻求产前护理,并表示她们在第一次就诊时建议使用产前维生素。11人给病人开了产前维生素的处方。剩下的患者要么选择传统的非处方产前维生素胶囊,要么选择不太传统的可咀嚼(粘性)维生素,因为它们提供的营养成分浓度较低。营养咨询的常见障碍是资源有限和时间限制。临床医生评估他们提供营养咨询的信心和能力分别为中等和合格。结论堪萨斯州农村地区尚未将DHA和胆碱的新营养建议纳入护理标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Large Left Atrial Myxoma Discovered During Restaging of Breast Cancer. New and Improved Kansas Journal of Medicine: Perspective from the Editor-in-Chief. Challenges in Anesthetic Management in a 25-Year-Old Patient with Ichthyosis. Factors Affecting Parental Intent to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 in the United States. Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1