How do technology-based accelerators build their legitimacy as new organizations in an emerging entrepreneurship ecosystem?

Berna Beyhan, İ. Akçomak, D. Cetindamar
{"title":"How do technology-based accelerators build their legitimacy as new organizations in an emerging entrepreneurship ecosystem?","authors":"Berna Beyhan, İ. Akçomak, D. Cetindamar","doi":"10.1108/jeee-06-2022-0161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to understand technology-based accelerators’ legitimation efforts in an emerging entrepreneurship ecosystem.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research is based on qualitative inductive methodology using ten Turkish technology-based accelerators.\n\n\nFindings\nThe analysis indicates that accelerators’ legitimation efforts are shaped around crafting a distinctive identity and mobilizing allies around this identity; and establishing new collaborations to enable collective action. Further, the authors observe two types of technology-based accelerators, namely, “deal flow makers” and “welfare stimulators” in Turkey. These variations among accelerators affect how they build their legitimacy. Different types of accelerators make alliances with different actors in the entrepreneurship ecosystem. Accelerators take collective action to build a collective identity and simultaneously imply how they are distinguished from other organizations in the same category and the ones in the old category.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study presents a framework to understand how accelerators use strategies and actions to legitimize themselves as new organizations and advocate new norms, values and routines in an emerging entrepreneurship ecosystem. The framework also highlights how different accelerators support legitimacy building by managing the judgments of diverse audiences and increasing the variety of resources these audiences provide to the ecosystem.\n","PeriodicalId":45682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-06-2022-0161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to understand technology-based accelerators’ legitimation efforts in an emerging entrepreneurship ecosystem. Design/methodology/approach This research is based on qualitative inductive methodology using ten Turkish technology-based accelerators. Findings The analysis indicates that accelerators’ legitimation efforts are shaped around crafting a distinctive identity and mobilizing allies around this identity; and establishing new collaborations to enable collective action. Further, the authors observe two types of technology-based accelerators, namely, “deal flow makers” and “welfare stimulators” in Turkey. These variations among accelerators affect how they build their legitimacy. Different types of accelerators make alliances with different actors in the entrepreneurship ecosystem. Accelerators take collective action to build a collective identity and simultaneously imply how they are distinguished from other organizations in the same category and the ones in the old category. Originality/value This study presents a framework to understand how accelerators use strategies and actions to legitimize themselves as new organizations and advocate new norms, values and routines in an emerging entrepreneurship ecosystem. The framework also highlights how different accelerators support legitimacy building by managing the judgments of diverse audiences and increasing the variety of resources these audiences provide to the ecosystem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于技术的加速器如何在新兴的创业生态系统中建立其作为新组织的合法性?
目的本文旨在了解基于技术的加速器在新兴创业生态系统中的合法化努力。设计/方法论/方法本研究基于定性归纳方法,使用了十种土耳其技术加速器。结果分析表明,加速器的合法化努力是围绕着塑造一个独特的身份和围绕这个身份动员盟友而形成的;以及建立新的合作,以便采取集体行动。此外,作者观察了两种基于技术的加速器,即土耳其的“交易流制造者”和“福利刺激者”。加速器之间的这些差异影响了它们建立合法性的方式。不同类型的加速器与创业生态系统中的不同参与者结成联盟。加速器采取集体行动来建立集体身份,同时暗示他们如何与同一类别中的其他组织和旧类别中的组织区分开来。独创性/价值这项研究提供了一个框架,以了解加速器如何利用战略和行动将自己合法化为新组织,并在新兴的创业生态系统中倡导新的规范、价值观和惯例。该框架还强调了不同的加速器如何通过管理不同受众的判断和增加这些受众为生态系统提供的各种资源来支持合法性建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: JEEE acquaints the readers with the latest trends and directions of explorations in the theory and practice of entrepreneurship. For the research section, the Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies considers high quality theoretical and empirical academic research articles in the field of entrepreneurship, as well as general reviews. The ‘Entrepreneurship in practice’ section publishes insights from industry, case studies, policy focus pieces and interviews with entrepreneurs. Coverage will focus primarily on the following topics: Government policy on entrepreneurship International entrepreneurship Small and medium-sized enterprises Family-owned businesses The innovator as an individual and as a personality type New venture creation and acquisitions of a growing company Entrepreneurial behaviour in large organizations Venture financing and entrepreneurial education Minority issues in small business and entrepreneurship Corporate and non-profit entrepreneurship Ethics, the entrepreneur and the company Entrepreneurial cooperation and networking Entrepreneurial environment and cross-cultural management Comparative studies of entrepreneurship and marketing issues Development of the service sector and Chinese economy Chinese marketing and business innovation Service marketing and service innovation Brand management and network innovation Supply chain management and customer relationship management Entrepreneurial processes Risk management and venture capital Entrepreneurship and environmental sustainability Entrepreneurial growth and business sustainability Entrepreneurship, social sustainability, and social justice Entrepreneurship, proverty alleviation, and economic development.
期刊最新文献
The impact of robotic working patterns on employee work life and job satisfaction: evidence from ethnic minority businesses in the UK Inequality and entrepreneurship: future research trends Why small business owners get demotivated? Modeling “unwillingness to grow” using ISM approach Disentangling tech-enabled system change in social enterprises: an empirical exploration of Ashoka fellows Navigating the digital landscape: communication visibility and entrepreneurial opportunity identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1